The University as Pedagogical Form: Public Study, Responsibility, Mondialisation



Universities are increasingly mobilised to address societal challenges. We argue that in order to take up their responsibility, universities are confronted first of all with the challenge to maintain themselves as universities, i.e. as forms of public and collective study that are not protecting and facilitating but are complicating and exposing learning and research and, therefore, that constitute a very particular way to deal with the challenges. This requires the invention of and experimentation with new forms, but, as we argue, these are primarily new forms regarding her “pedagogy”, i.e. her power to study and think. We first sketch the figure of the researcher and learner today, we then suggest to recall the university as universitas studii, and to pay attention to the university’s pedagogical form and public aspects. This is the basis to reclaim, in the third section, the university from a pedagogical point of view, that is, as the mondial university.


Public Study European Higher Education Area (EHEA) Slow Science Masschelein Shared World 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Blake, N., Smeyers, P., Smith, R., & Standish, P. (1998). Thinking again. Education after postmodernism. Westport, CT/London: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  2. Conference. (2009). The Bologna Process 2020 – The European Higher Education Area in the new decade. Communiqué of the Conference of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education, Leuven and Louvain-la-Neuve, 28–29 April 2009. Retrieved January 26, 2018, from
  3. Dewey, J. (1927/1991). The public and its problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press/Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  4. European Commission. (2000). Towards a European Research Area. COM (2000) 6, European Commission: Brussels.Google Scholar
  5. European Commission. (2003). The role of the universities in the Europe of knowledge. COM (2003) 58, European Commission: Brussels.Google Scholar
  6. European Commission. (2005). Mobilising the brainpower of Europe: Enabling the Universities to make their full contribution to the Lisbon Strategy. COM (2005) 152. European Commission: Brussels.Google Scholar
  7. European Commission. (2006). Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: education, research and innovation. COM (2006) 208, European Commission: Brussels.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission. (2012a). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Reinforced European Research Area Partnership for Excellence and Growth COM (2012) 392 final. European Commission: Brussels. Retrieved January 22, 2018, from
  9. European Commission. (2012b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Rethinking Education: Investing in skills for better socio-economic outcomes. COM/2012/0669 final. Retrieved November 6, 2017, from
  10. Flusser, V. (1999). The factory. In The shape of things: A philosophy of design (pp. 43–50, A. Mathews, Trans.). London: Reaktion Books. Original edition: Flusser, V. (1993) Vom Stand der Dinge: Eine Kleine Philosophie des Design. Gottingen: Steidl.Google Scholar
  11. Gorz, A. (2008). Écologica. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  12. Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Latour, B. (2016a). Is Geo-logy the new umbrella for all the sciences? Hints for a neo-Humboldtian university. Lecture given at Cornell University, USA, 25th October 2016.Google Scholar
  14. Latour, B. (2017). Où atterir? Comment s’orienter en politique? Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  15. Maex, K. (2016). The unconventional future. Speech on the occasion of the 385th dies natalis of the University of Amsterdam, Monday, 9 January 2016. Retrieved January 26, 2018, from file:///C:/Users/u0008954/Downloads/dies-natalis-385-def.pdfGoogle Scholar
  16. Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2015). Lessons of/for Europe. Reclaiming the school and the university. In P. Gielen (Ed.), No culture, no Europe. On the foundation of politics (pp. 143–164). Amsterdam: Valis.Google Scholar
  17. Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rheinberger, H. J. (2007, 5 Mai). Man weiss nicht genau, was man nicht weiss. Über die Kunst, das Unbekannte zu erforschen. Neue Zürcher Zeitung.Google Scholar
  19. Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2009a). The public and its university: Beyond learning for civic employability? European Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 204–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2009b). Towards the idea of a world university. Interchange, 40(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stengers, I. (2005). The cosmopolitical proposal. In B. Latour & P. Weibel (Eds.), Making things public. Atmospheres of democracy (pp. 994–1003). London/Cambridge, MA/Karlsruhe, Germany: MIT Press/ZKM.Google Scholar
  22. Stengers, I. (2011). Another science is possible!. A plea for slow science. Retrieved from
  23. Stengers, I. (2013). Au temps des catastrophes. Résister à la barbarie qui vient. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  24. Supiot, A. (2012). The grandeur and misery of the social state. Inaugural Lecture at the Collège de France, 29th November 2012. Retrieved January 21, 2018, from
  25. von Humboldt, W. (1810). On the internal and external organisation of the higher scientific institutions in Berlin. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Education & SocietyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations