Advertisement

The Effectiveness of Tactical Communication and Protection Systems (TCAPS) on Minimizing Hearing Hazard and Maintaining Auditory Situational Awareness

  • Jeremy GastonEmail author
  • Ashley Foots
  • Tim Mermagen
  • Angelique Scharine
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 780)

Abstract

In military environments, maintaining Auditory Situational Awareness (ASA) and providing protection from hearing hazard are often dueling priorities. Traditional passive hearing protection devices (HPD’s) can provide adequate protection to the soldier from impulsive and continuous noise hazards, but this can come at the cost of reduced ASA. Anecdotal reports indicate that many soldiers may forego HPD use entirely in an attempt to maximize ASA. However, unprotected ears can lead to temporary threshold shifts (TTS) and permanent threshold shifts (PTS) that can be much worse for ASA than HPD use. Tactical Communication and Hearing Protection Systems (TCAPS) are active electronic systems that can provide a potential solution to this problem by giving the soldier protection, environmental hearing and radio communications. This paper discusses evaluating the effectiveness of these systems through objective measures of attenuation and subject human sound localization.

Keywords

Sound localization Sound attenuation Tactical communications and hearing systems Shock tube Hearing protection device Environmental hearing 

References

  1. 1.
    D. o. V. Affairs: Veterans Benefits Administration. Annual Benefits Report - 2010 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown, A.D., Beemer, B.T., Greene, N.T., Argo, T., Meegan, G.D., Tollin, D.J.: Effects of active and passive hearing protection devices on sound source localization, speech recognition, and tone detection. PLoS ONE 10(8), e0136568 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clasing, J., Casali, J.G.: Warfighter auditory situation awareness: effects of augmented hearing protection/enhancement devices and TCAPS for military ground combat applications. Int. J. Audiol. 53, S43–S52 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Henderson, D., Hamernik, R.P., Dosanjh, D.S., Mills, J.H.: Noise-Induced Hearing Loss, pp. 41–68. Raven, New York (1976)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Suter, A.H.: The ability of mildly hearing-impaired individuals to discriminate speech in noise (AMRL Report No. TR-78-4), Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH (1978)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Suter, A.H.: The effects of hearing protection on speech communication and the perception of warning signals (HEL-TM-2-89), US Army Human Engineering Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD (1989)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abel, S., Hay, V.: Sound localization the interaction of aging, hearing loss and hearing protection. Scand. Audiol. 25(1), 3–12 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Atherley, G., Noble, W.: Effect of ear-defenders (ear-muffs) on the localization of sound. Occup. Environ. Med. 27(3), 260–265 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Noble, W.G., Russell, G.: Theoretical and practical implications of the effects of hearing protection devices on localization ability. Acta Otolaryngol. 74(1), 29–36 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vause, N.L., Grantham, D.W.: Effects of earplugs and protective headgear on auditory localization ability in the horizontal plane. Hum. Factors 41(2), 282–294 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scharine, A.A., Weatherless, R.A.: US Marine Corps level-dependent hearing protector assessment: objective measures of hearing protection devices (ARL-TR-7203. DTIC No.: ADA597684), Aberdeen Proving Ground (MD), Army Research Laboratory (US) (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ANSI/ASA S12.6: American National Standard Methods for Measuring the Real-Ear Attenuation of Hearing Protectors. Acoustical Society of America, New York City (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ANSI/ASA S12.42: American National Standard Methods for Measurement of Insertion Loss of Hearing Protection Devices in Continuous or Impulsive Noise Using Microphone-in-Real-Ear or Acoustic Test Fixture Procedures. Acoustical Society of America, New York City (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scharine, A.A.: Degradation of auditory localization performance due to helmet ear coverage: the effects of normal acoustic reverberation (ARL-TR-4879), Aberdeen Proving Ground, U.S. Army Research Laboratory (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scharine, A.A., Binseel, M.S., Mermagen, T., Letowski, T.R.: Sound localisation ability of soldiers wearing infantry ACH and PASGT helmets. Ergonomics 57(8), 1222–1243 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scharine, A.A., Domanico, M.C., Foots, A.N., Mermagen, T.J., Weatherless, R.A.: Auditory localization performance with Gamma Integrated Eye and Ear Protection. (ARL-TR-7914), U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scharine, A.A., Weatherless, R.A.: Evaluation of variants of 3 M Peltor ComTAC tactical communication and protection system (TCAPS) headsets: measures of hearing protection and auditory performance. (ARL-TR-6667), U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Scharine, A.A., Weatherless, R.A.: Helmet Electronics & Display System-Upgradeable Protection (HEaDS-UP) Phase III Assessment: Headgear Effects on Auditory Perception (ARL-TR-6723), U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    BSR/ASA S3.71: Draft American National Standard: methods for measuring the effect of head-worn devices on free-field directional sound localization in the horizontal plane. American National Standards Institute/Acoustical Society of America, New York City (201X)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gaston, J., Dickerson, K., Hipp, D., Gerhardstein, P.: Change deafness for real spatialized environmental scenes. Cogn. Res. Princ. Implic. 2(1), 29 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gaston, J., Mermagen, T., Foots, A., Dickerson, K.: Auditory localization performance in the azimuth for tactical communication and protection systems. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127(4), 1 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature (outside the USA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeremy Gaston
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ashley Foots
    • 1
  • Tim Mermagen
    • 1
  • Angelique Scharine
    • 1
  1. 1.United States Army Research LaboratoryAberdeenUSA

Personalised recommendations