Skip to main content

Energy Production Landscape and Fluid Injections in Energy-Related Activities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 463 Accesses

Abstract

The energy landscape is changing in these decades due to several factors, namely the realization that fossil resources are finite, the environmental concerns induced by pollution due these fossil resources, the unclear future in terms of potential and reliable alternative energies, and the increasing world competition due to the economic emergence, today of China, tomorrow of India, and next of Africa. Each of these factors is thought to contribute to increase the cost of energy both at the country and individual levels. Recent and current energy productions worldwide are overviewed, including quantified amounts and trends. Data are listed per country, per capita, or per energy type, highlighting conventional and unconventional resources. Emphasis is laid on the environmental and geomechanical issues associated with fluid injections and withdrawals, subsidence, uplift, and microseismicity. Carbon dioxide sequestration is paid a particular attention. A short account of the technical details of the geological landscape and injection operations of the three main pilot sites that have been tested so far is provided to help discovering the many issues that are posed by carbon sequestration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The United Nations define the poverty line by the availability of 40 kg of oil equivalent for cooking and 10 kg of oil equivalent for electricity per person and per year.

  2. 2.

    Density of air at sea level and under 15 \(^\circ \)C: 1.225 kg/m\(^3\).

  3. 3.

    *tight rock: intrinsic permeability<0.1 mD \(= 10^{-16}\) m\(^2\).

  4. 4.

    In France, as of 2016, a bonus was rewarded when buying a gasoline powered car that emitted less than 60 g of CO\(_2\) per km. Instead, let us consider an emission rate of 200 g of CO\(_2\) per km by a car that runs for 30 000 km a year, resulting in 6 000 kg CO\(_2\) per year. Therefore 165 000 cars emit about 1 Mt of CO\(_2\) per year. The total emissions of CO\(_2\) in France for the year 2015 amounted to 328 Mt.

  5. 5.

    Tiltmeters can measure changes of inclination as small as \(10^{-9}\) radian: the displacement of a gas bubble modifies the geometry of the contact between an electrolyte and electrodes, which induces a change of electrical resistance. Tiltmeters are more accurate than inclinometers.

  6. 6.

    Global CCS Institute 2011, The global status of CCS: 2011, Canberra, Australia, ISBN 978-0-9871863-0-0, http://hub.globalccsinstitute.com/sites/default/files/publications/22562/global-status-ccs-2011.pdf.

References

  • Advanced Resources International: Godec, M. L. (2012, February 7, 8). From CO\(_2\)-EOR to CCS: prospects and challenges of combining CO\(_2\)-EOR with storage. IEA-OPEC CO\(_2\)-EOR Kuwait Workshop. Kuwait City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachu, S., & Adams, J. J. (2003). Sequestration of CO\({}_2\) in geological media in response to climate change: Capacity of deep saline aquifers to sequester CO\({}_2\) in solution. Energy Conversion and Management, 44, 3151–3175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, S. M., & Cole, D. R. (2008). CO\(_2\) sequestration in deep sedimentary formations. Elements, 4, 325–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohloli, B., Bjørnarå, T. I., Grande, L., Park, J., Oye, V., Kühn, D., & Rucci A. (2013, November 26–28 ). Geomechanical assessment of ground surface uplift due to CO\(_2\) storage at In Salah, Algeria. International Workshop on Geomechanics and Energy - The Ground as Energy Source and Storage. Lausanne, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dusseault, M. B., & Collins, P. M. (2008, June 20–23). Geomechanics effects in thermal processes for heavy oil exploitation. CSEG Recorder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fialko, Y., & Simons, M. (2000). Deformation and seismicity in the Coso geothermal area, Inyo County, California: Observations and modeling using satellite radar interferometry. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(B9), 21781–21793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, D., Jones, D. R., & Ingebritsen, S. E. (1999). Land subsidence in the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1182, 175 pp. https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/circ1182/#pdf.

  • Galloway, D., Jones, D. R., & Ingebritsen, S. E. (2000). Land subsidence in the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 165-00, 4 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • GeoNet: What does CO\(_{2}\) geological storage really mean? Publication of the European Commission. (2008). www.co2geonet.eu.

  • Gernert, J., Jäger, A., & Span, R. (2014). Calculation of phase equilibria for multi-component mixtures using highly accurate Helmholtz energy equations of state. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 375, 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IAEA. (2014). Nucléaire et changement climatique. https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/iaea-issues-2014-edition-climate-change-and-nuclear-power.

  • IEA Report: CO\(_2\) Capture and Storage. (2006). IEA Energy Technology Essentials, ETE01.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA Report: Technology Roadmap: Carbon Capture and Storage. (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA Report Resources to Reserves. (2013). Oil, Gas and Coal Technologies for the Energy Markets of the Future. Retrieved June 7, 2017, from https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/Resources2013.pdf.

  • IEA Carbon Capture and Storage, The solution for deep emissions reductions. IEA Brochure. (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2005). Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved September 28, 2017, from http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/srccs/srccs_wholereport.pdf.

  • Khakim, M. Y. N., Tsuji, T., & Matsuoka, T. (2012). Geomechanical modeling for InSAR-derived surface deformation at steam-injection oil sand fields. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 96–97, 152–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., Dong, M., Li, Z., Huang, S., Qing, H., & Nickel, E. (2005). Gas breakthrough pressure for hydrocarbon reservoir seal rocks: implications for the security of long-term CO\(_2\) storage in the Weyburn field. Geofluids, 5(4), 326–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Near Wellbore: Azaroual, M., André, L., Peysson, Y., Pironon, J., Broseta, D., Dedecker, F., Egermann, P., Desroches, J., & Hy-Billiot, J. (2012, September 17–19). Behaviour of the CO\(_2\) injection well and the near wellbore during carbon dioxide injection in saline aquifers. Proceedings TOUGH Symposium, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patzek, T. W., & Silin, D. B. (2000). Use of InSAR in surveillance and control of a large field project. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8qj5n8tc.

  • Scott, V., Gilfillan, S., Markusson, N., Chalmers, H., & Haszeldine, R. S. (2013). Last chance for carbon capture and storage. Nature Climate Change, 3, 105–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, J. C. (2014). Time to stop investing in carbon capture and storage and reduce government subsidies of fossil-fuels. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate, 5(2), 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.266.

  • Teatini, P., Gambolati, G., Ferronato, M., Settari, A., & Walters, D. (2011). Land uplift due to subsurface fluid injection. Journal of Geodynamics, 51, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdon, J. P. (2012). The Weyburn CO\(_2\) injection project. In Chap. 2, Microseismic monitoring and geomechanical modelling of CO\(_2\) storage in subsurface reservoirs, Springer Theses. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdon, J. P., Kendall, J. M., Stork, A. L., Chadwick, R. A., White, D. J., & Bissell, R. C. (2013). Comparison of geomechanical deformation induced by megatonne-scale CO\(_2\) storage at Sleipner, Weyburn, and In Salah. Proceedings National Academy Sciences USA, 110, E2762–E2771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdon, J.P. & Kendall, J.M. (2013, November 26–28). Earthquakes induced by fluid injection - implications for secure CO\(_2\) storage. International Workshop on Geomechanics and Energy - The Ground as Energy Source and Storage. Lausanne, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welkenhuysen, K., Brüstle, A. K., Bottig, M., Ramirez, A., Swennen, R., & Piessens, K. (2016). A techno-economic approach for capacity assessment and ranking of potential options for geological storage of CO\(_2\) in Austria. Geologica Belgica, 19(3-4), 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., & Monea, M. (2004). The IEA GHG Weyburn CO\(_2\) Monitoring and Storage Project, Summary 2000–2004. In M. Wilson & M. Monea (Eds.) IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Loret .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Loret, B. (2019). Energy Production Landscape and Fluid Injections in Energy-Related Activities. In: Fluid Injection in Deformable Geological Formations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94217-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94217-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94216-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94217-9

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics