A Test Platform for the Evaluation of Augmented Reality Head Mounted Displays in Industrial Applications

  • Volker PaelkeEmail author
  • Carsten Röcker
  • Jendrik Bulk
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 793)


This paper presents a test platform for the systematic evaluation of head-mounted displays (HMDs). The focus is on an augmented reality (AR) test application for assembly tasks, which supports tests that are flexible in terms of complexity and scope, thus enabling the realistic assessment of usability, comfort and ergonomics by the test users.


Head-Mounted Displays (HMDs) Augmented Reality (AR) Test platform Evaluation Assembly 


  1. 1.
    Büttner, S., Sand, O., Röcker, C.: Extending the design space in industrial manufacturing through mobile projection. In: Adjunct Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI 2015), pp. 1130–1133. ACM Press (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Büttner, S., Mucha, H., Funk, M., Kosch, T., Aehnelt, M., Robert, S., Röcker, C.: The design space of augmented and virtual reality applications for assistive environments in manufacturing: a visual approach. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA 2017), pp. 433–440. ACM, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fellmann, M., Robert, S., Büttner, S., Mucha, H., Röcker, C.: Towards a framework for assistance systems to support work processes in smart factories. In: Holzinger, A., Kieseberg, P., Tjoa, A.M., Weippl, E. (eds.) Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction. Proceedings of the International Cross Domain Conference for Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction (CD-MAKE 2017). LNCS, vol. 10410, pp. 59–68 Springer, Heidelberg (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flatt, H., Koch, N., Röcker, C., Günter, A., Jasperneite, J.: A context-aware assistance system for maintenance applications in smart factories based on augmented reality and indoor localization. In: Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA 2015), Luxembourg, 8–11 September 2015, pp. 1268–1271 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sand, O., Büttner, S., Paelke, V., Röcker, C.: smARt.Assembly – projection-based augmented reality for supporting assembly workers. In: Lackey, S., Shumaker, R. (eds.) Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. LNCS, vol. 9740, pp. 643–652. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paelke, V., Röcker, C., Koch, N., Flatt, H.: User interfaces for cyber-physical systems: expanding the designer’s toolbox. In: at – Automatisierungstechnik, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 833–843. De Gruyter, Oldenbourg (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rolland, J.P., Holloway, R.L., Fuchs, H.: Comparison of optical and video see-through, head-mounted displays. In: Proceedings of SPIE 2351, Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, vol. 293, 21 December 1995Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Azuma, R.: A survey of augmented reality. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 6(4), 355–385 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Özbek, C., Giesler, B., Dillmann, R.: Jedi training: playful evaluation of head-mounted augmented reality display systems. In: Proceedings of SPIE, Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems XI, San Diego, USA, vol. 5291, pp. 454–463, May 2004Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Büttner, S., Röcker, C., Sand, O.: Using head-mounted displays and in-situ projection for assistive systems – a comparison. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA 2016). ACM, New York (2016). Article No. 44Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paelke, V., Büttner, S., Mucha, H., Röcker, C.: A checklist based approach for evaluating augmented reality displays in industrial applications. In: 8th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2017). Springer, Los Angeles, July 2017Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baird, K.M., Barfield, W.: Evaluating the effectiveness of augmented reality displays for a manual assembly task. Virtual Reality 4, 250–259 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Radkowski, R., Herremaa, J., Olivera, J.: Augmented reality based manual assembly support with visual features for different degrees-of-difficulty. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 31(5), 337–349 (2015) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ubimax Frontline Productpage.
  15. 15.
    fischertechnik Homepage.
  16. 16.
    lego Homepage.
  17. 17.
    Makeblock Homepage.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hochschule BremenBremenGermany
  2. 2.inIT - Institut für industrielle InformationstechnikLemgoGermany
  3. 3.Fraunhofer IOSB-INALemgoGermany

Personalised recommendations