Skip to main content

Introduction to the Volume

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Discourse, Culture and Organization

Part of the book series: Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse ((PSDS))

Abstract

This introducing chapter describes the Essex School in Discourse Analysis and discusses some of its theoretical premises and previous methodological shortcomings. It is argued that no other discourse analytical approach offers such a wide span of philosophical, theoretical and methodological ideas about the discursive structuration of the social world. However, it is also observed that previous research conducted by the Essex School witnesses a gap between theoretical and methodological takes on discourse. This chapter locates the primary aim of this edited volume in further elaboration and bridging of this gap. This contribution presents the common issues and questions discussed in single contributions, explains the overall structure of the book and provides a short introduction to the book chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

A

  • Angermuller, J. (2011). From the Many Voices to Subject Positions in Anti-Globalization Discourse: Enunciative Pragmatics and the Polyphonic Organization of Subjectivity. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2992–3000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angermuller, J., Maingueneau, D., & Wodak, R. (Eds.). (2014). The Discourse Studies Reader: Main Currents in Theory and Analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

B

  • Bröckling, U., Krassmann, S., & Lemke, T. (Eds.). (2011). Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

C

  • Critchley, S. (2004). Is There a Normative Deficit in the Theory of Hegemony? In S. Critchley & O. Marchart (Eds.), Laclau: A Critical Reader (pp. 113–122). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, S., & Marchart, O. (Eds.). (2004). Laclau: A Critical Reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

D

  • Diaz-Bone, R. (2006). Zur Methodologisierung der Foucaultschen Diskursanalyse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1), Art. 6. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs060168. Accessed 3 Mar 2010.

  • Diaz-Bone, R. (2007). Die französische Epistemologie und ihre Revisionen: Zur Rekonstruktion des methodologischen Standortes der Foucaultschen Diskursanalyse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(2), Art. 6. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0702241. Accessed 3 Mar 2010.

  • Diaz-Bone, R. (2010). Kulturwelt, Diskurs und Lebensstil: Eine Diskurstheoretische Erweiterung der Bourdieuschen Distinktionstheorie (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

G

  • Glasze, G. (2007a). The Discursive Constitution of a World-Spanning Region and the Role of Empty Signifiers: The Case of Francophonia. Geopolitics, 12, 656–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasze, G. (2007b). Vorschläge zur Operationalisierung der Diskustheorie von Laclau und Mouffe in einer Triangulation von lexikometrischen und interpretativen Methoden. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(2), Art. 14. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0702143. Accessed 17 Apr 2008.

  • Glynos, J., & Howarth, D. (2007). Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glynos, J., & Howarth, D. (2008). Critical Explanation in Social Science: A Logics Approach. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 54(1), 5–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynos, J., Howarth, D., Norval, A., & Speed, E. (2009). Discourse Analysis: Varieties and Methods (Review Paper NCRM/014, Unpublished Discussion Paper). ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.

    Google Scholar 

H

  • Howarth, D. (2004). Towards a Heideggerian Social Science: Heidegger, Kisiel and Weiner on the Limits of the Anthropological Discourse. Anthropological Theory, 4(2), 229–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, D. (2005). Applying Discourse Theory: The Method of Articulation. In D. Howarth & J. Torfing (Eds.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance (pp. 316–349). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, D. (2006). The Method of Articulation. In M. van den Brink & T. Metze (Eds.), Words Matter in Policy and Planning: Discourse Theory and Method in Social Science (pp. 23–42). Utrecht: Labor Grafimedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, D., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). (2005). Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, D., Norval, A., & Stavrakakis, Y. (Eds.). (2000). Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

K

  • Keller, R. (2011). Wissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse: Grundlegung eines Forschungsprogramms (3rd ed.). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R. (2013). Doing Discourse Analysis: An Introduction for Social Scientists. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

L

  • Laclau, E. (1977). Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1980). Populist Rupture and Discourse. Screen Education, 34, 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1990). New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. In E. Laclau (Ed.), New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time (pp. 3–85). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004). Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

M

  • Marttila, T. (2015a). Post-Foundational Discourse Analysis: From Political Difference to Empirical Research. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marttila, T. (2015b). Post-Foundational Discourse Analysis: A Suggestion for a Research Program. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(3), Art. 1. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs150319. Accessed 28 Feb 2018.

  • Marttila, T. (2018). Neoliberalism, the Knowledge-Based Economy and Entrepreneur as Metaphor. In D. Cahill, M. Cooper, M. Konings, & D. Primrose (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Neoliberalism (pp. 565–579). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (1979). Hegemony and Ideology in Gramsci. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), Gramsci and Marxist Theory (pp. 168–205). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

N

  • Nadel, S. F. (1962). The Theory of Social Structure (2nd ed.). London: Cohen & West Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadesan, M. (2008). Governmentality, Biopower and Everyday Life. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonhoff, M. (2006). Politischer Diskurs und Hegemonie: Das Projekt ‘Soziale Marktwirtschaft’. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Book  Google Scholar 

S

  • Schmidt-Wellenburg, C. (2009). Die neoliberale Gouvernementalität des Unternehmens: Management und Managementberatung zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 38(4), 320–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Wellenburg, C. (2014). Die Regierung des Unternehmens: Managementberatung im neoliberalen Kapitalismus. Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

T

  • Torfing, J. (2005). Discourse Theory: Achievements, Arguments and Challenges. In D. Howarth & J. Torfing (Eds.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance (pp. 1–32). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

W

  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Z

  • Zienkowski, J. (2012). Overcoming the Post-Structuralist Methodological Deficit: Metapragmatic Markers and Interpretative Logics in a Critique of the Bologna Process. Pragmatics, 22(3), 501–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zienkowski, J. (2017). Reflexivity in the Transdisciplinary Field of Critical Discourse Studies. Palgrave Communications. Published Online: https://www.nature.com/articles/palcomms20177. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomas Marttila .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marttila, T. (2019). Introduction to the Volume. In: Marttila, T. (eds) Discourse, Culture and Organization. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94122-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94123-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics