Abstract
This introducing chapter describes the Essex School in Discourse Analysis and discusses some of its theoretical premises and previous methodological shortcomings. It is argued that no other discourse analytical approach offers such a wide span of philosophical, theoretical and methodological ideas about the discursive structuration of the social world. However, it is also observed that previous research conducted by the Essex School witnesses a gap between theoretical and methodological takes on discourse. This chapter locates the primary aim of this edited volume in further elaboration and bridging of this gap. This contribution presents the common issues and questions discussed in single contributions, explains the overall structure of the book and provides a short introduction to the book chapters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
A
Angermuller, J. (2011). From the Many Voices to Subject Positions in Anti-Globalization Discourse: Enunciative Pragmatics and the Polyphonic Organization of Subjectivity. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2992–3000.
Angermuller, J., Maingueneau, D., & Wodak, R. (Eds.). (2014). The Discourse Studies Reader: Main Currents in Theory and Analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
B
Bröckling, U., Krassmann, S., & Lemke, T. (Eds.). (2011). Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges. New York: Routledge.
C
Critchley, S. (2004). Is There a Normative Deficit in the Theory of Hegemony? In S. Critchley & O. Marchart (Eds.), Laclau: A Critical Reader (pp. 113–122). London: Routledge.
Critchley, S., & Marchart, O. (Eds.). (2004). Laclau: A Critical Reader. London: Routledge.
D
Diaz-Bone, R. (2006). Zur Methodologisierung der Foucaultschen Diskursanalyse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1), Art. 6. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs060168. Accessed 3 Mar 2010.
Diaz-Bone, R. (2007). Die französische Epistemologie und ihre Revisionen: Zur Rekonstruktion des methodologischen Standortes der Foucaultschen Diskursanalyse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(2), Art. 6. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0702241. Accessed 3 Mar 2010.
Diaz-Bone, R. (2010). Kulturwelt, Diskurs und Lebensstil: Eine Diskurstheoretische Erweiterung der Bourdieuschen Distinktionstheorie (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
G
Glasze, G. (2007a). The Discursive Constitution of a World-Spanning Region and the Role of Empty Signifiers: The Case of Francophonia. Geopolitics, 12, 656–679.
Glasze, G. (2007b). Vorschläge zur Operationalisierung der Diskustheorie von Laclau und Mouffe in einer Triangulation von lexikometrischen und interpretativen Methoden. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(2), Art. 14. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0702143. Accessed 17 Apr 2008.
Glynos, J., & Howarth, D. (2007). Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Abingdon: Routledge.
Glynos, J., & Howarth, D. (2008). Critical Explanation in Social Science: A Logics Approach. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 54(1), 5–35.
Glynos, J., Howarth, D., Norval, A., & Speed, E. (2009). Discourse Analysis: Varieties and Methods (Review Paper NCRM/014, Unpublished Discussion Paper). ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.
H
Howarth, D. (2004). Towards a Heideggerian Social Science: Heidegger, Kisiel and Weiner on the Limits of the Anthropological Discourse. Anthropological Theory, 4(2), 229–247.
Howarth, D. (2005). Applying Discourse Theory: The Method of Articulation. In D. Howarth & J. Torfing (Eds.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance (pp. 316–349). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Howarth, D. (2006). The Method of Articulation. In M. van den Brink & T. Metze (Eds.), Words Matter in Policy and Planning: Discourse Theory and Method in Social Science (pp. 23–42). Utrecht: Labor Grafimedia.
Howarth, D., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). (2005). Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Howarth, D., Norval, A., & Stavrakakis, Y. (Eds.). (2000). Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press.
K
Keller, R. (2011). Wissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse: Grundlegung eines Forschungsprogramms (3rd ed.). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Keller, R. (2013). Doing Discourse Analysis: An Introduction for Social Scientists. London: Sage.
L
Laclau, E. (1977). Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory. London: New Left Books.
Laclau, E. (1980). Populist Rupture and Discourse. Screen Education, 34, 87–93.
Laclau, E. (1990). New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. In E. Laclau (Ed.), New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time (pp. 3–85). London: Verso.
Latour, B. (2004). Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.
M
Marttila, T. (2015a). Post-Foundational Discourse Analysis: From Political Difference to Empirical Research. London: Palgrave.
Marttila, T. (2015b). Post-Foundational Discourse Analysis: A Suggestion for a Research Program. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(3), Art. 1. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs150319. Accessed 28 Feb 2018.
Marttila, T. (2018). Neoliberalism, the Knowledge-Based Economy and Entrepreneur as Metaphor. In D. Cahill, M. Cooper, M. Konings, & D. Primrose (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Neoliberalism (pp. 565–579). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Mouffe, C. (1979). Hegemony and Ideology in Gramsci. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), Gramsci and Marxist Theory (pp. 168–205). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
N
Nadel, S. F. (1962). The Theory of Social Structure (2nd ed.). London: Cohen & West Ltd.
Nadesan, M. (2008). Governmentality, Biopower and Everyday Life. New York: Routledge.
Nonhoff, M. (2006). Politischer Diskurs und Hegemonie: Das Projekt ‘Soziale Marktwirtschaft’. Bielefeld: transcript.
S
Schmidt-Wellenburg, C. (2009). Die neoliberale Gouvernementalität des Unternehmens: Management und Managementberatung zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 38(4), 320–341.
Schmidt-Wellenburg, C. (2014). Die Regierung des Unternehmens: Managementberatung im neoliberalen Kapitalismus. Konstanz: UVK.
T
Torfing, J. (2005). Discourse Theory: Achievements, Arguments and Challenges. In D. Howarth & J. Torfing (Eds.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance (pp. 1–32). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
W
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Z
Zienkowski, J. (2012). Overcoming the Post-Structuralist Methodological Deficit: Metapragmatic Markers and Interpretative Logics in a Critique of the Bologna Process. Pragmatics, 22(3), 501–534.
Zienkowski, J. (2017). Reflexivity in the Transdisciplinary Field of Critical Discourse Studies. Palgrave Communications. Published Online: https://www.nature.com/articles/palcomms20177. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marttila, T. (2019). Introduction to the Volume. In: Marttila, T. (eds) Discourse, Culture and Organization. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94122-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94123-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)