Skip to main content

No Room for Good Intentions? Private Metal Detecting and Archaeological Sites in the Plow Layer in Norway

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Competing Values in Archaeological Heritage

Abstract

The concept of automatic protection of archaeological sites and monuments, predating a certain age, in the Norwegian Cultural Heritage Act doesn’t separate between visible and non-visible sites, or between known or listed sites and the previously unknown ones. The principle is that any site or monument fulfilling the right age criteria has equal juridical protection, even in the plow zone. While farming activities are legal on automatically protected sites in the plow zone, implied restrictions in the law preclude the free private use of metal detectors on the same sites, regardless of whether the intention is to rescue endangered archaeological objects in the topsoil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Norwegian National Authority for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime.

References

  • Bill, J., & Rødsrud, C. L. (2013). En ny markeds- og produksjonsplass ved Gokstad i Vestfold. Nicolay Arkeologisk Tidsskrift, 120, 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerbing, M. (2016). Arkeologiska utgrävningar av båtgravar och gravhögar, Bitterstad, Hadsel kommune, Nordland. Arkeologiske rapporter, Tromsø museum – Universitetsmuseet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Directorate for Cultural Heritage. (2016). Vernestatus. Askeladden veiledning. http://www.riksantikvaren.no/Veiledning/Data-og-tjenester/Vernestatus. Accessed 20 Aug 2016.

  • Directorate for Cultural Heritage. (2017). Retningslinjer. Privat bruk av metallsøker. https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2451251/Metallsoeker.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2017.

  • Dobat, A. S. (2013). Between rescue and research: An evaluation after 30 years of liberal metal detecting in archaeological research and heritage practice in Denmark. European Journal of Archaeology, 16(4), 704–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobat, A. S. (2016). Metal detecting in Denmark. Advantages and disadvantages of the liberal model. In J. Martens & M. Ravn (Eds.), Pløyejord som kontekst. Nye utfordringer for forskning, forvaltning og formidling. Artikkelsamling (pp. 51–67). Kristiansand: Portal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobat, A. S., & Jensen, A. T. (2016). “Professional amateurs”. Metal detecting and metal detectorists in Denmark. Open Archaeology, 2016(2), 70–84. De Gruyter Open. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2016-0005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (2013). Biting the bullet: The role of hobbyist metal detecting within battlefield archaeology. Internet Archaeology, 33. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.33.3.

  • Ferguson, N. (2016). Lost in translation: Discussing the positive contribution of hobbyist metal detecting. Open Archaeology, 2016(2), 115–126. De Gruyter Open. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2016-0008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feveile, C. (2015). Metaldetektorproblematikken – uens regler og deres konsekvenser. In A. Pedersen & S. M. Sindbæk (Eds.), Et fælles hav – Skagerrak og Kattegat i vikingetiden (pp. 120–135). København: Nordlige verdener, Nationalmuseet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen, J., Rasmussen, J. M., & Lie, R. O. (2016). Private metal detecting and archaeology in Norway. Open Archaeology, 2016(2), 160–170. De Gruyter Open. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2016-0012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guribye, R., & Holme, J. (2001). 7.3 Kapittel II – Automatisk fredete kulturminner. In J. Holme (Ed.), Kulturminnevern – lov, forvaltning, håndhevelse, Bind II. Kulturminneloven med kommentarer (pp. 32–101). Oslo: ØKOKRIM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, S. A. (2017). Quantitative analysis of open-source data on metal detecting for cultural property: Estimation of the scale and intensity of metal detecting and the quantity of metal-detected cultural goods. Cogent Social Sciences, 3, 1298397. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1298397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, M. B. (2016). Pløjelagsfund og formationsprocesser. Problemer ved fortolking af detektorfund fra dyrket mark. In J. Martens & M. Ravn (Eds.), Pløyejord som kontekst. Nye utfordringer for forskning, forvaltning og formidling. Artikkelsamling (pp. 69–87). Kristiansand: Portal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, K., & Brandlien, B. (2013). Slagene på Re. Re: Re kommune.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvanli, J. (2016). Oldsaker og metallsøking. Hvem skal redde Norgeshistorien fra plogen? Frá haug ok heiðni, 2016(1), 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvanli, J., & Sørensen, L. S. (2016). Om metallsøking i Norge og formålstjenlig kulturvern av løse gjenstander i pløyelaget. Fornvännen, 111(1), 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maixner, B. (2015a). Én lov – ulik forvaltningspolitikk Om norsk forvaltningspraksis rundt privat metallsøking i pløyejord og dens konsekvenser. Fornvännen, 110(2), 201–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maixner, B. (2015b). Missingen/Åkeberg i Østfold – en storgård fra jernalderen med tilknyttet håndverkssenter. Fornvännen, 110(1), 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maixner, B. (2016). Metallsøkprosjekt Missingen/Åkeberg – et samarbeidsprosjekt mellom forvaltningen og frivillige rundt en storgård fra jernalderen. In J. Martens & M. Ravn (Eds.), Pløyejord som kontekst. Nye utfordringer for forskning, forvaltning og formidling. Artikkelsamling (pp. 133–146). Kristiansand: Portal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, J. (2016). Pløyejord som kontekst. Metallsøking, forskning og forvaltning. In J. Martens & M. Ravn (Eds.), Pløyejord som kontekst. Nye utfordringer for forskning, forvaltning og formidling. Artikkelsamling (pp. 13–22). Kristiansand: Portal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwegian Metal Detecting Society (NMF). (2016). About NMF. http://nmf.nu/. Accessed 20 May 2016.

  • Ødegård, J. (2017). Fant det de håpet på. Aura avis, 12 Sept 2017: 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Øhrn, C. (2016). Fant over 200 gjenstander med metalldetektor. Buskerud County Council. http://www.bfk.no/Nyheter/Hovedsiden/Nyheter-2016/Fant-over-200-gjenstander-med-metalldetektor/. Accessed 5 May 2016.

  • Östergren, M. (2013). Metallsökning innom uppdragsarkeologi och vetenskalig forskning. Fornvännen, 108(1), 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. M. (2013). Metalldetektor til nytte og besvær. Miljøkrim, 2013(2), 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. M. (2014a). Securing cultural heritage objects and fencing stolen goods? A case study on museums and metal detecting in Norway. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 47(1), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2014.899616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. M. (2014b). Reply to comments from Suzie Thomas, Martin Mesicek, Raimund Karl, Mads Ravn, Maria Lingström. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 47(2), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2014.957236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolfsen, P. (2016). Det rette pipet. Metalldetektorbruk i Norge. In J. Martens & M. Ravn (Eds.), Pløyejord som kontekst. Nye utfordringer for forskning, forvaltning og formidling. Artikkelsamling (pp. 111–126). Kristiansand: Portal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogsfjord, A. (2017). Personal email regarding the number of metal detecting finds at the Museum for Cultural History in 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skre, D., & Pilø, L. (2016). Metallsøkerdilemmaet. Klassekampen, 20 Feb 2016: 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. (2009). Introduction. In S. Thomas, P. G. Stone, & H. Matters (Eds.), Metal detecting & archaeology (Vol. 2, pp. 1–11). Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. (2016). The future of studying hobbyist metal detecting in Europe: A call for a transnational approach. Open Archaeology, 2016(2), 140–149. De Gruyter Open. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2016-0010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonning, C., Lie, O. R., Vibeke, L., & Gabler, M. (2017). Er de alle løsfunn? Metallsøkfunn og potensialet for bevart kontekst under pløyelaget. Viking, LXXX, 223–242. https://doi.org/10.5617/viking.5481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulriksen, J., Jensen, B. F., Langkjær, L. G., Rieck, F., & Stjernqvist, K. W. (2015). Detektorfund fra Sjælland og Møn – afgjort et vækstområde. Årbog, 2015, 98–119 Museum Sydøstdanmark.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jostein Gundersen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gundersen, J. (2019). No Room for Good Intentions? Private Metal Detecting and Archaeological Sites in the Plow Layer in Norway. In: Campbell, S., White, L., Thomas, S. (eds) Competing Values in Archaeological Heritage. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94102-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94102-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94101-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94102-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics