Abstract
Andalusian legislation prohibits unauthorised intervention on archaeological sites, whether by professional archaeologists conducting excavations or amateurs searching for archaeological objects with metal detectors. The use of these devices is only permitted for research teams or in places where there is no reason to expect archaeological remains to be found. Violations of these provisions are punishable with fines and the confiscation of devices.
Contrary to the popular belief of many northern European archaeologists who write about this issue, the underlying reasoning for these restrictions is not the regular use of such devices to obtain major archaeological spoils, much less a mistrust between professional archaeologists and amateurs, but rather reasons of an axiological nature. (1) The law establishes the public ownership of archaeological heritage as a social good, the value of which supersedes private interests and the right to private property. (2) The law also provides that archaeological heritage is a finite and non-renewable resource and establishes the obligation to transmit this heritage to future generations. (3) The law promotes archaeological activities guided by an interest in historical knowledge rather than the mere pleasure of locating ‘treasure’.
The regular enforcement of this policy has led to both a decline in the number of detector users freely seeking archaeological remains at archaeological sites and a proliferation of detector users on beaches. It has also encouraged the integration of detectorists in archaeological research teams. This model emphasises demand management, based on the understanding that archaeological heritage is a finite, non-renewable resource. It thus stands in contrast to other models that aim to manage supply.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
R&D Project DER2016-74841-R, ‘Instrumentos jurídicos en defensa de la integridad de los bienes arqueológicos’ (‘Legal instruments in defence of the integrity of archaeological heritage) funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for the 2017–2019 period.
- 2.
References
Anderson, W. (2010). Blessing the fields? A study of late-medieval Ampullae from England and Wales. Medieval Archaeology, 54, 182–203. https://doi.org/10.1179/174581710X12790370815850.
Aznar Gómez, M. J. (2004). La protección internacional del patrimonio cultural subacuático con especial referencia al caso de España. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
Bacigalupo, E. (1994). Espagne. Le système de sanctions administratives et impact du système de sanctions communautaires sur l’ordre juridique espagnol. In The system of administrative and penal sanctions in the Member States of the European Communities. Volume I—National reports (pp. 137–174). Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
Barber, M. B. (2005). Prehistoric rockshelter use on Virginia’s Appalachian Plateaus: Settlement patterns, looting, and survivability. Archaeology of Eastern North America, 33(1), 31–49.
Barcelona Llop, A. (2000). El dominio público arqueológico. Revista de Administración Pública, 151, 133–165.
Barcelona Llop, A. (2002). Aspectos del régimen jurídico de las autorizaciones arqueológicas. Revista Aragonesa de Administración Pública, 21, 113–146.
Barford, P. (2010). Archaeology, collectors and preservation: A reply to David Gill. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 20, 16–23.
Bland, R. (2004). The treasure act and the portable antiquities scheme: A case study in developing public archaeology. In N. Merriman (Ed.), Public archaeology (pp. 272–291). London: Routledge.
Bland, R. (2009). The development and future of the Treasure Act and portable antiquities scheme. In S. Thomas & P. G. Stone (Eds.), Metal detecting and archaeology (pp. 63–86). Newcastle: The Boydell Press.
Bland, R. (2015). One country’s response to the problem of looting: The Treasure Act and portable antiquities scheme in England and Wales. Cuadernos de Prehistoria y Arqueología de la Universidad de Granada, 25, 201–209.
Brown, G. B. (1915). The care of ancient monuments. An account of the legislative and other measures adopted in European countries for protecting ancient monuments and objects and scenes of natural beauty, and for preserving the aspect of historical cities. Cambridge: The University Press.
Chaves Tristán, F. (2014). Valoración del contenido numismático del Farmm. In Fondo Arqueológico Ricardo Marsal Monzón (pp. 221–224). Sevilla: Junta de Andalucía.
Consejería de Cultura. (1993). Plan General de Bienes Culturales. Sevilla: Junta de Andalucía.
Deckers, P. (2013). The past, present and future of amateur archaeological metal detecting in Flanders. In Forum: The looting of archaeological heritage (Part I – Beyond metal detectors: Around the plundering of archaeological heritage). AP Journal, 3, 13–17.
Department of National Heritage. (1996). Portable antiquities: a discussion document. http://www.britarch.ac.uk/cba/potant1.html. Accessed 4 Nov 2002.
Dobat, A. S. (2013). Between rescue and research: An evaluation after 30 years of liberal metal detecting in archaeological research and heritage practice in Denmark. European Journal of Archaeology, 16(4), 704–725.
Dobat, A. S., & Jensen, A. T. (2016). “Professional amateurs”. Metal detecting and metal detectorists in Denmark. Open Archaeology, 2, 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2016-0005.
Dobinson, C., & Denison, S. (1995). Metal detecting and archaeology in England. London: English Heritage and Council for British Archaeology.
Dromgoole, S. (2004). Murky waters for government policy: The case of a 17th century British warship and 10 tonnes of gold coins. Marine Policy, 28, 189–198.
English, P. (2013). Who controls the past? Internet Archaeology, 33. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.33.9.
Ferguson, N. (2013). Biting the bullet: The role of hobbyist metal detecting within battlefield archaeology. Internet Archaeology, 33. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.33.3
Fincham, D. (2011). The distinctiveness of property and heritage. Penn State Law Review, 115(3), 641–684.
García Fernández, J. (2002). La protección del patrimonio arqueológico. Especial referencia a los artículos 40.2, 41 y 42 de la Ley del Patrimonio Histórico Español. Patrimonio Cultural y Derecho, 6, 169–179.
Gerstenblith, P. (2013). The law as mediator between archaeology and collecting. Internet Archaeology, 33. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.33.10
Giannini, M. S. (1976). I beni culturali. Rivista Trimestrale di Diritto Publico, 1, 3–38.
Gill, D. W. J. (2010). The portable antiquities scheme and the Treasure Act: Protecting the archeology of England and Wales? Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 20, 1–11.
Gill, D. W. J. (2014). The so-called Crosby Garrett Helmet. Journal of Art Crime, 11(Spring), 53–59.
Hardy, S. E. (2017). Quantitative analysis of open-source data on metal detecting for cultural property: Estimation of the scale and intensity of metal detecting and the quantity of metal-detected cultural goods. Cogent Social Sciences, 3, 1298397.
Hart, S., & Chilton, E. (2015). Digging and destruction: Artifact collecting as meaningful social practice. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(4), 318–335.
Hollowell-Zimmer, J. (2003). Digging in the dirt – ethics and ‘low end looting’. In L. J. Zimmerman, K. D. Vitelli, & J. Hollowell-Zimmer (Eds.), Ethical issues in archaeology (pp. 45–56). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Karl, R. (2011). On the highway to hell: Thoughts on unintended consequences for Portable Antiquities of ∫11(1) Austrian Denkmalschutzgesetz. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 2(2), 111–133.
Lambrick, G. (2001). From treasure to public good. British Archaeology, 58. http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba58/issues.shtml. Accessed 23 Oct 2002.
Leigh, L. H. (1994). United Kingdom — The system of administrative and penal sanctions. In The system of administrative and penal sanctions in the Member States of the European Communities. Volume I—National reports (pp. 352–373). Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
Lewis, M. (2016). A detectorist’s utopia? Archaeology and metal-detecting in England and Wales. Open Archaeology, 2, 127–139.
Mallouf, R. J. (1996). An unraveling rope: The looting of America’s past. American Indian Quarterly, 20(2), 197–208.
Merriman, N. (1989). The social basis of museum and heritage visiting. In S. M. Pearce (Ed.), Museum studies in material culture (pp. 153–172). Leicester: Leicester University Press.
Miller, B. (2015, January 11). A tantalising mystery: The story behind the huge AngloSaxon coin hoard found in Buckinghamshire. Culture, 24. http://www.culture24.org.uk/history-and-heritage/archaeology/art512480-a-tantalising-mystery-the-story-behind-the-huge-anglo-saxon-coin-hoard-found-in-buckinghamshire. Accessed 13 Oct 2016.
Morales Bravo de Laguna, J. (2015). La Guardia Civil y la lucha contra el expolio arqueológico. Cuadernos de Prehistoria y Arqueología de la Universidad de Granada, 25, 31–48.
Moshenska, G. (2010). Portable antiquities, pragmatism and the ‘precious things’. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 20, 24–27.
Moss, R. (2008, February 18). Portable antiquities scheme moves to allay fears over nighthawking. Culture, 24. http://www.culture24.org.uk/history/archaeology/discoveries+and+fieldwork/art65930. Accessed 19 Feb 2009.
O’Keefe, P. J., & Prott, L. V. (1984). Law and the cultural heritage. Discovery and excavation (Vol. I). Oxford: Professional Books Limited.
Ojeda Calvo, R. (2014). Proyecto Farmm: Actuaciones para el conocimiento, la conservación y el estudio de un fondo arqueológico excepcional. In Fondo Arqueológico Ricardo Marsal Monzón (pp. 9–26). Sevilla: Junta de Andalucía.
Ortiz Sánchez, M., & Albert Muñoz, M. D. A. (2011). La protección del patrimonio arqueológico subacuático, competencias sancionadoras de la Comunidad Autónoma de Andalucía: caso Odyssey. Revista Andaluza de Administración Pública, 79, 159–170.
Palmer, R. (2007). Federal prosecutions under the archaeological resources protection act of 1979: A ten-years review (1996–2005). In S. Hutt & D. Tarler (Eds.), Yearbook of cultural property law 2007 (pp. 221–237). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Pollard, T. (2009). “The rust of time”: Metal detecting and battlefield archaeology. In S. Thomas & P. G. Stone (Eds.), Metal detecting & archaeology (pp. 181–203). Newcastle: The Boydell Press.
Proulx, B. B. (2013). Archaeological site looting in “glocal” perspective: Nature, scope, and frequency. American Journal of Archaeology, 117(1), 111–125.
Radin, M. J. (1993). Reinterpreting property. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Rasmussen, J. M. (2014). Securing cultural heritage objects and fencing stolen goods? A case study on museums and metal detecting in Norway. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 47(1), 83–107.
Rodotà, S. (1981). Il terribile diritto. Studi sulla proprietà privata. Bologna: Il Moulino.
Rodríguez Temiño, I. (2012a). Indianas jones sin futuro. La lucha contra el expolio del patrimonio arqueológico. Madrid: JAS Arqueología SLU.
Rodríguez Temiño, I. (2012b). Propuesta para la valoración de daños en yacimientos arqueológicos. Patrimonio Cultural y Derecho, 16, 275–293.
Rodríguez Temiño, I. (2016). Rational grounds for dialogue between archaeologists and metal detectorists in Spain. Open Archaeology, 2, 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2016-0011.
Rodríguez Temiño, I., & Matas Adamuz, F. J. (2013). Arqueólogos contra «piteros», «piteros» contra arqueólogos. In J. Almansa Sánchez (Ed.), Arqueología Pública en España (pp. 187–217). Madrid: JAS Arqueología SLU.
Rodríguez Temiño, I., & Roma Valdés, A. (2015). Fighting against the archaeological looting and the illicit trade of antiquities in Spain. International Journal of Cultural Property, 22(1), 111–130.
Ruíz Rodríguez, A. (2015). La Protohistoria en el Farmm. In Fondo Arqueológico Ricardo Marsal Monzón (pp. 119–130). Sevilla: Junta de Andalucía.
Sayles, W. (2013). Ideology, governance and consequences from a collector’s point of view. Internet Archaeology, 33. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.33.11
Simpson, F. (2009). Cumwhitton Norse burial. In S. Thomas & P. G. Stone (Eds.), Metal detecting & archaeology (pp. 137–146). Newcastle: The Boydell Press.
Spencer, P. D. (2009). The construction of histories: Numismatics and metal detecting. In S. Thomas & P. G. Stone (Eds.), Metal detecting & archaeology (pp. 125–136). Newcastle: The Boydell Press.
Standing Conference on Portable Antiquities. (1996). Response to ‘Portable antiquities: a discussion document’. http://www.britarch.ac.uk/cba/potant2.html. Accessed 4 Nov 2002.
Swift, N. (2016, October 8). Metal detecting: A miasma of statistics and lies. The Heritage Journal. https://heritageaction.wordpress.com/2016/10/08/metaldetectingamiasmaofstatisticsandlies/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter. Accessed 2 Nov 2016.
Thomas, S. (2009). Wanborough revisited: The rights and wrongs of treasure trove law in England and Wales. In S. Thomas & P. G. Stone (Eds.), Metal detecting & archaeology (pp. 153–166). Newcastle: The Boydell Press.
Thomas, S. (2016). The future of studying hobbyist metal detecting in Europe: A call for a transnational approach. Open Archaeology, 2, 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2016-0010.
Thomas, S., Wessman, A., Siltainsuu, J., & Perttola, W. (2015). Understanding metal detecting and archaeology in Finland. Cuadernos de Prehistoria y Arqueología de la Universidad de Granada, 25, 187–199.
Ulst, I. (2010). The problems of ‘black archaeology’ in Estonia. Estonian Journal of Archaeology, 14(2), 153–159.
Wilson, P., & Harrison, M. (2013). Three years on from ‘The Nighthawking Survey’: innovations in heritage protection. Internet Archaeology, 33. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.33.7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rodríguez Temiño, I., Yáñez, A., Ortiz Sánchez, M. (2019). Archaeological Heritage and Metal Detectors: Should We Be Managing Supply or Demand?. In: Campbell, S., White, L., Thomas, S. (eds) Competing Values in Archaeological Heritage. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94102-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94102-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94101-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94102-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)