Advertisement

Elements of a Science of Power: Hobbes, Smith and Ricardo

  • Heinz D. KurzEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought book series (PHET)

Abstract

Power is a pervasive phenomenon in the economy and society, associated with inequality of income, wealth, race, gender, information, and so on. However, much of contemporary economics still cherishes the purely abstract case of perfect competition in which no agent has any economic power whatsoever. Things were totally different at the time of the classical economists from Adam Smith to David Ricardo. Smith approved of Thomas Hobbes’ dictum that wealth is power but did not share the political inferences the latter drew from it. He and David Ricardo instead proposed economic policies, laws, regulations and institutions designed to contain the amassing of power in the hands of a few that endangered “the security of the whole society” (Smith).

References

  1. Böhm-Bawerk, E. v. (1914). Macht oder ökonomisches Gesetz, Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft, Socialpolitik und Verwaltung, 23, 205–271. American translation by J. R. Metz as Control or Economic Law. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Dahl, R. A. (1957). The Concept of Power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elliot, J. E. (2000). Adam Smith’s Conceptualization of Power, Markets, and Politics. Review of Social Economy, 58(4), 429–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Garegnani, P. (1984). Value and Distribution in the Classical Economists and Marx. Oxford Economic Papers, 36(2), 291–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Hilferding, R. (1910). Das Finanzkapital. Eine Studie zur jüngsten Entwicklung des Kapitalismus. Vienna: Verlag der Wiener Volksbuchhandlung Ignaz Brand & Co.Google Scholar
  7. Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan or the Matter, Forme, & Power of a Common-wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill. London: Andrew Crooke. Cited After the Version Prepared by Rod Hay for the McMaster University Archive of the History of Economic Thought.Google Scholar
  8. Jessop, B. (2012). Marxist Approaches to Power. In E. Amenta, K. Nash, & A. Scott (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology (pp. 3–14). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Kalecki, M. (1939). Essays in the Theory of Economic Fluctuations. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  10. King, J. (2013). David Ricardo. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kurz, H. D. (2012). Don’t Treat Too Ill My Piero! Interpreting Sraffa’s Papers. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36, 1535–1569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kurz, H. D. (2015). David Ricardo on the Art of “Elucidating Economic Principles” in the Face of a “Labyrinth of Difficulties”. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(5), 818–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kurz, H. D. (2016a). Adam Smith on Markets, Competition and Violations of Natural Liberty. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(2), 615–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kurz, H. D. (2016b). David Ricardo (1772–1823). In G. Faccarello & H. D. Kurz (Eds.), Handbook on the History of Economic Thought (Vol. I, pp. 120–143). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  15. Kurz, H. D. (2016c). Economic Thought: A Brief History. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kurz, H. D., & Salvadori, N. ([1995] 1997). Theory of Production: A Long-Period Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Revised Paperback Edition.Google Scholar
  17. Kurz, H. D., & Salvadori, N. (2015). Revisiting Classical Economics. Studies in Long-Period Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Kurz, H. D., & Sturn, R. (2013). Die größten. Ökonomen: Adam Smith, Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
  19. Popitz, H. ([1986] 1992). Phänomene der Macht (2nd enlarged ed). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  20. Ricardo, D. (1951–1973). The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, 11 vols. Edited by P. Sraffa with the collaboration of M. H. Dobb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (cited as Works, vol. number, page number).Google Scholar
  21. Rothschild, K. W. (Ed.). (1971). Power in Economics, in Penguin Modern Economics Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  22. Russell, B. (1938). Power: A New Social Analysis. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  23. Salvadori, N., & Signorino, R. (2013). The Classical Notion of Competition Revisited. History of Political Economy, 45(1), 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Samuels, W. J. (1973). Adam Smith and the Economy as a System of Power. Review of Social Economy, 31(2), 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Samuels, W. J. (Ed.). (1979). The Economy as a System of Power. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  26. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of Man. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, A. (1969 [1759]). The Theory of Moral Sentiments, 1st edn 1759, 6th edn 1790, with an introduction by E. G. West. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, A. (1976). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 2 vols. In R. H. Campbell & A. S. Skinner (Eds.), The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Sraffa, P. (1951). Introduction. In Ricardo (1951) (Vol. I).Google Scholar
  30. Sraffa, P. (1960). Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Steuart, S. J. (1966 [1767]). An Inquiry into the Principles of Political Oeconomy, in two vols, edited and with an introduction by A. S. Skinner. Edinburgh/London: Oliver & Bond.Google Scholar
  32. Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Weber, M. (1972). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (5th ed.). Tübingen: Mohr. (1st ed. 1922 in Grundriß der Sozialökonomik, Part III, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations