• Manuela MoscaEmail author
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought book series (PHET)


The introduction examines the existing historiography on the concept of power within economic theory. Mosca explains that this book is on how the notion of power has been employed by economists of the past with different ideologies and orientations. She identifies four aspects of power in economic thought: political power, asymmetries of economic power, market power and the power of economists as policymakers. Finally she introduces the chapters of the book outlining the paths taken by economists’ ideas on power in western economic thought.


  1. Bartlett, R. (1989). Economics and Power. An Inquiry into Human Relations and Markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowles, S., Franzini, M., & Pagano, U. (1999). The Politics and Economics of Power. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1993). Power and Wealth in a Competitive Capitalist Economy. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 21(4), 324–353.Google Scholar
  4. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2008). Power. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2nd ed., 8 vols, Vol. 6, pp. 565–570). Houndmills: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. De Cecco, M. (1997). The Role of the Institutions in Pantaleoni’s Thought. In M. Baldassarri (Ed.), Maffeo Pantaleoni. At the Origin of the Italian School of Economics and Finance (pp. 187–195). Rome: SIPI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foucault, M. (1978–79]). The Birth of Biopolitics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar
  7. Galbraith, J. K. (1983). The Anatomy of Power. Boston: Houghton, Miffin.Google Scholar
  8. Galbraith, J. K., & Bartel, R. D. (1983). The Anatomy of Power. Challenge, 26(3), 26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Groenewegen, P. D. (1998). Maffeo Pantaleoni. In F. Meacci (Ed.), Italian Economists of the 20th Century (pp. 44–68). Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  10. Guizzo, D. (2015). Foucault’s Contributions for Understanding Power Relations in British Classical Political Economy. Economia, 16(2), 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirschmann, A. O. (1977). The Passion and the Interests. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (pp. 32–33). New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  13. Levy, D. M., & Peart, S. J. (2017). Escape from Democracy. The Role of Experts and the Public in Economic Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Morishima, M. (1995). Foreword: Yasuma Takata (1883–1971). In Y. Takata (Ed.), Power Theory of Economics (pp. xi–xxv). New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  15. Palermo, G. (2016). Economics and Power. A Marxist Critique. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pantaleoni, M. (1898). An Attempt to Analyze the Concepts of “Strong” and “Weak” in Their Economic Connexion. The Economic Journal, 8(30), 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Perelman, M. (2014). The Power of Economics vs the Economics of Power: Introduction. World Review of Political Economy, 5(3), 284–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Perroux, F. (1973). Pouvoir et économie. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
  19. Rothbard, M. N. (1970). Power and the Market. Menlo Park: Institute for Humane Studies.Google Scholar
  20. Rothschild, K. W. (Ed.). (1971). Power in Economics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  21. Rothschild, K. W. (2002). The Absence of Power in Contemporary Economic Theory. Journal of Socio-Economics, 31, 433–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Takata, Y. (1995). Power Theory of Economics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tool, M. R., & Samuels, W. J. (Eds.). (1980). The Economy as a System of Power. Oxford: Transaction Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SalentoLecceItaly

Personalised recommendations