Skip to main content

Landscape-ecological Propositions in LANDEP—Proposal of Optimal Use of Areas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 391 Accesses

Abstract

The objective of this stage is to formulate a proposal of an ecologically optimal utilisation of each type of landscape-ecological complexes. This proposition should provide a frame for the ecologically optimum organisation of the territory. The propositions have several stages using different applications of criteria. The negative selection is based on the application of limiting values which determine the unsuitable activities, thus, on the other side, also those, which are suitable for a given area. The primary alternative proposition results in the determination of few (one to three) most suitable activities—alternatives—for each type of landscape-ecological complexes. Secondary variant proposition assigns an ecologically most suitable use (a function) for each type of landscape-ecological complexes by selection from the alternatives yielded by the primary proposition. The result of secondary proposition is so-called functional typisation of territory. The functional typisation of territory involves the designation of:

  • suitable areas for different agricultural activities;

  • suitable areas of green infrastructure, water areas, wetlands and forests;

  • suitable areas for recreational use and areas for residential buildings;

  • suitable areas for industrial and technical objects.

This result mainly serves as a base for physical/spatial/territorial plans of municipalities and their functional zones. Tertiary proposition—functional regionalisation of territory—aims to determine the most ecologically appropriate function of larger territorial units (subregions, regions) in terms of their broader territorial (choric) relations. The result should serve as the basis for physical/spatial/territorial plans of a region. Special and detailed proposals may have very different characters. The most common examples are the projects of territorial system of ecological stability TSES that are specifically defined in the legislation. Other partial outputs are: suitability of territory for hydro-melioration, for establishment of water areas, ponds, solving the problems of erosion and accumulation, proposal of landscape greenery, proposal of recreational utilisation of the landscape, problems related to the conflict of interests, spatial projection of the limits of territory for selected activities, problems of flooding, etc. The chapter is illustrated by numerous tables and maps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Buček A, Lacina J (1994) Mapování biotopů a územní systémy ekologické stability. In: Mapování biotopů, sborník referátů, VŠZ v Brně, pp 59–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Buček A, Lacina J, Lőw J (1986) Územní systémy ekologické stability krajiny. Životné prostredie 20(2):82–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Diviaková A (2011) Biotické komplexy pre environmentálny manažment. VKÚ, a. s, Harmanec

    Google Scholar 

  • Izakovičová Z et al (2000) Metodické pokyny na vypracovanie projektov regionálnych ÚSES a miestnych ÚSES. Združenie krajiny 21, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Lőw J et al. (1984) Zásady pro vymezování a navrhování územních systému ekologické stability v územne plánovací projekcii. Agroprojekt, Brno

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L (1994) Koncepcia územného systému ekolgickej stability (ÚSES) na Slovensku. In: Prírodná časť krajiny, jej výskum a návrhy na využitie, zborník referátov. PriF UK KFG, pp 19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L (2002) Positional—functional characteristics of natural-settlement nodal microregions. In: Landscape Atlas of Slovak Republic, Chapter VII, Map 23. MŽP SR Bratislava, SAŽP Banská Bystrica

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L, Krcho J, Hrnčiarová T, Matečný I, Kozová M (1997) Morfometrické ukazovatele reliéfu a ich úcelové interpretácie pre plánovacie procesy. Nadácia Katedry UNESCO pre ekologické vedomie, Banská Štiavnica

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L, Diviaková A, Izakovičová Z (2011) Ekologické siete a územný systém ekologickej stability. Vydavateľstvo TÚ vo Zvolene

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L, Miklisová D (1987) Shape and size of elementary areas and microbasins—evaluation in landscape ecological planning (LANDEP) methodics. Shape and size as spatial categories in landscape ecological planning (LANDEP) methodics. I. part. Bratislava, Ecology (ČSSR), 6(1):85–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L, Špinerová A (2013) Krajinné plánovanie. Praktikum. Technická univerzita vo Zvolene, 96 pp. ISBN 978-80-228-2610-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyzeová M (2010) Navrhovanie územných systémov ekologickej stability na vybraných modelových územiach. Životné prostredie 44(3):138–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Špinerová A (2011) Prvky využitia zeme ako regulátor zón dynamiky svahu v modelovom území Ilijského potoka. Doktorská dizertačná práca. TU Zvolen

    Google Scholar 

  • Špinerová A, Miklós L (2007) Priestorová diverzita krajiny. Záverečná správa. Katedra UNESCO pre ekologické vedomie a trvalo-udržateľný rozvoj, Banská Štiavnica, Inštitucionálny projekt FEE TU Zvolen č. AE-II 3402 Priestorová diverzita krajiny

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to László Miklós .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Miklós, L., Špinerová, A. (2019). Landscape-ecological Propositions in LANDEP—Proposal of Optimal Use of Areas. In: Landscape-ecological Planning LANDEP. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94021-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics