Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Principles, Theoretical and Methodological Background of Landscape-ecological Planning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Landscape-ecological Planning LANDEP

  • 499 Accesses

Abstract

The methodology of landscape-ecological planning LANDEP is reflected in the law and is incorporated to the practice of particular spatial planning procedures in Slovakia. First chapter of the book deals with different understandings of spatial planning procedures and compares them to LANDEP. LANDEP represents a spatial approach to the protection of the environment. Its methodology, content and practice correspond with the principles of the integrated landscape management defined since AGENDA 21 from Rio Summit 1992 in all relevant environmental political documents, in particular, the following:

  • cross-departmental conception: sectorial integration, partnership,

  • over-regionality: spatial integration, regional cooperation,

  • complex approach to the environment: professional integration, landscape-ecological complexity.

The chapter defines the main institutional spatial planning procedures supported by relevant law in Slovakia and their relations to the integrated landscape management and LANDEP. These tools are divided into four groups as follows:

  • the information base of integrated landscape management,

  • landscape-ecological framework for integrated landscape management: the LANDEP, Territorial System of Ecological Stability TSES and the territorial planning,

  • the sectoral spatial management and planning instruments as nature conservation and landscape protection; river basin management; flood prevention, agricultural land consolidations projects; forest management plans,

  • instruments for control and assessment of the impact of planning procedures on the environment as environment impact assessment and strategic impact assessment (E.I.A., S.E.A) and Integrated Prevention and Pollution Control (IPPC).

As the LANDEP is by legislation assigned in Slovakia to the territorial planning, which according to its content represents the most integrating concept with respect to the aforementioned principles, the chapter discusses the act on territorial planning in detail. The material object of LANDEP is defined as landscape as a geosystem. The final subchapter deals with those aspects of geosystems which relate to the particular methodical steps of the LANDEP procedure defines the relevant models, structures, elements and properties of geosystems including the most frequent values of indicators of properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AGENDA 21 (1992) United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Rio de Janeiro (United Nations), A/Conf. l5l/ 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Agger P, Brandt J (1988) Dynamics of small biotopes in Danish agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecol 1(4):227–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahrend Ch et al (1992) Spannungsfeld Landschaftsplannung. Zur Geschichte und Struktur eines heterogenen Faches. Schribri, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Alterman R (ed) (2001) National-level planning in democratic countries: an international comparison of city and regional policy-making. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool

    Google Scholar 

  • Antrop M (2004) Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Plann 67:9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antrop M (2013) A brief history of landscape research. In: Howard P, Ian Thompson I, Waterton E (eds) The Routledge companion to landscape studies. Routledge, Oxon, New York, p 12–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Antrop M, Van Eetvelde V (2017) Landscape perspectives. The holistic nature of landscape. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Armand DL (1949) Zadachi geografii v svyazi s planom peredelki prirodi stepey. Voprosi geografii No. 13. Moskva

    Google Scholar 

  • Armand DL (1952) Nauka o landschafte. Mysly, Moskva

    Google Scholar 

  • Armand DL (1964) Logichnost geograficheskikh klassifikaciy i skhem rayonirovaniya. In: Razvitie i preobrazovanie geograficheskoy sredi. Moskva

    Google Scholar 

  • Barančoková M, Krajčí J, Kollár J, Belčáková I (2010) Landscape ecology—methods, applications and interdisciplinary approach. Institute of Landscape Ecology Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsch H, Saupe G et al (1993) Zur Integration landschaftsoekologischer und sociooekologischer Daten in gebietliche Planungen. Potsdamer Geographische Forschungen, Band 4. Universität Potsdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian O, Grunewald K, V. Khoroshev AV (2015) The significance of geosystem and landscape concepts for the assessment of ecosystem services: exemplified in a case study in Russia. Landscape Ecol 30(5):1145–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0200-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastian O, Schreiber KF (1994) Analyse und ökologische Bewertung der Landschaft. Gustav Fischer Verlag Jena—Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Belčáková I (2013a) Ochrana, tvorba a manažment krajiny. Trio Publishing, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Belčáková I (2013b) Landscape Management. Theory and practice. Akva Rojal doo, Bački Petrovac

    Google Scholar 

  • Belčáková I, Bianco del P, Finka M, Furdík J, Jaššo M, Petríková D, Wood B (2003) Aktuálne otázky priestorového plánovania a rozvoja. Road, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy KL (1950) An outline of general system theory. Br J Philos Sci 1:139–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy KL von (1968) General System theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George Braziller. Penguin Books. revised edition 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezák P, Mederly P, Izakovičová Z, Špulerová J, Schleyer Ch (2017) Divergence and conflicts in landscape planning across spatial scales in Slovakia: an opportunity for an ecosystem services-based approach? Inter J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 13(2):119–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt J (1999) Geography as ‘landscape ecology. Dan J Geogr (Special Issue)1:21–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt J (2003) Multifunctional landscapes—perspectives for the future. J Environ Sci-China 15:187–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt J, Antrop M, Ramos IL, Padoa-Schioppa E, Porter J, Van Eetvelde V, Pinto-Correia T (2013a) How landscape ecology can promote the development of sustainable landscapes in Europe: the role of the European association for landscape ecology (IALE Europe) in the 21st century. Landscape Ecol 28(9):1641–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt J, Christensen AA, Svenningsen SR, Holmes E (2013b) Landscape practise and key concepts for landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecol 28(6):1125–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt J, Vejre H (2004) Multifunctional landscapes—motives, concepts and perceptions. In: Brandt J, Vejre H (ed) Multifunctional landscapes, vol 1, Theory, values and history, Witpress, p 3–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt J, Tress B, Tress G (Ed) (2000) Multifunctional landscapes: Interdisciplinary approaches to landscape research and management. In: Conference material for the international conference. Centre for landscape research, University of Roskilde, Denmark, 18–21 Oct 2000. Roskilde

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuste J, Kozová M, Finka M (2009) European Landscapes in transformation: Challenges for landscape ecology and management European IALE Conference 2009, Salzburg (Austria), Bratislava (Slovakia)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buček A, Lacina J, Lőw J (1986) Územní systémy ekologické stability krajiny. Životné prostredie 20(2):82–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchwald K (1980) Umwelt - Mensch - Gesellschaft. Die Entstehung der Umweltproblematik. In: Handbuch fur Planung, Gestaltung und Schutz der Umwelt. Edited by Buchwald/Engelhardt BLV Verlagsgesellschaft. Miinchen, Bern, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Institute of Planners (2013). https://web.archive.org/web/20130123140309/http://www.cip-icu.ca/web/la/en/default.asp

  • Chorley RJ, Kennedy BA (1971) Physical geography—a system approach. Prentice Hall Interantional Inc, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Constanza R (1997) The value of the World ́s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387/1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook EA, van Lier HN (eds) (1994) Landscape planning and ecological networks. Elsevier, Lausanne-New York-Oxford-Shannon-Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Csima P, Dublinszki-Boda B (ed) (2008) Tájökológiai kutatások. III. Tájökológiai Konferencia, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Csorba P (1987) A tájökológia időszerű kérdései az angol nyelvű szakirodalom alapján. Földrajzi Közlemények 35 (111.)1–2:74–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Csorba P (1988) The ecogeographical pattern map of Tokaj “Great Hill” and its environs. In: Ruzicka, M., Hrnciarová, T., Miklós, L (ed) Spatial and functional relationships in landscape ecology. VIIIth international symposium on problems of landscape ecological research. IEBE CBES of SAS. IALE East European Region. Bratislava, vol 1, pp 273–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Csorba P (1999) Tájszerkezet változások a Bodrogkeresztúri-félmedencében. Földrajzi. Közlemények 123(3–4):109–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Csorba P (2014) A tájszerkezet földrajzi értelmezése. A geographical interpretation of landscape structure. 4D Tájépítészeti és kertművészeti folyóirat. J Landscape Archit Garden Art 36:32–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Compendium of European planning systems (1997) Regional development studies report 28. European Commission. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (Earth Summit), Rio de Janeiro, July 3rd–12th

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullingworth B, Nadin V (2006) Town and country planning in the UK. Fourteenth edition. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7(3):260–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demek J (1974) Systémová teorie a studium krajiny. Studia Geographica, 40, Brno, Geografický ústav ČSAV

    Google Scholar 

  • Demek J (1978) The landscape as a geosystem. Geoforum 9(1):29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deverre Ch, De Sainte Marie Ch (2008) L’écologisation de la politique agricole européenne. Verdissement ou refondation des systèmes agro-alimentaires? Revue d’Etudes en Agriculture et. Environment 89(4):83–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive of the 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council - Water Framework Directive

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE)

    Google Scholar 

  • Diviaková A (2010) Hodnotenie líniových formácií nelesnej drevinovej vegetácie pre potreby územných systémov ekologickej stability. VKÚ, a.s, Harmanec

    Google Scholar 

  • Drdoš J (1967) Typizácia krajiny vo východnej časti Slovenského krasu a priľahlej časti Košickej kotliny. Biol. Práce, 12, 4, Vydavateľstvo SAV, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Drdoš J (1992) Prírodné prostredie: zdroje – potenciály – únosnosť – hazardy – riziká. Veda Bratislava, Geografický časopis 44(1):30–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Drdoš J (1995) Zamyslenie sa nad krajinným plánovaním. Životné prostredie 29(2):104–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Drdoš J, Miklós L, Kozová M, Urbánek J (1995) Základy krajinného plánovania. Technická univerzita vo Zvolene

    Google Scholar 

  • Drdoš J, Urbánek J, Mazúr E (1980) Landscape Syntheses and Their Role in Solving the Problems of Environment. Bratislava, Geografický časopis 32:119–l29

    Google Scholar 

  • Drdoš J (ed) (1983) Landscape synthesis. Geoecological Foundations of the complex landscape management. VEDA, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • European Landscape Convention (2000) Council of Europe, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Raumordnungscharta (1983) Institut für Landes- und tadtentwicklungsforschung des Landes Nordrhein- Westfalen

    Google Scholar 

  • European Spatial Development Perspective ESDP. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU (1999) European communities. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabos JG (1979) Planning the total landscape, a guide to inteligent land use. Westview Press, Boulder CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabos JG (1996) Greenways: the beginning of an international movement. Elsiever, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Feranec J, Oťahel J (2001) Krajinná pokrývka Slovenska (Land cover of Slovakia). Veda, SAV, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Finka M, Petríková D, Jamečný Ľ (2008) Analýza právnych predpisov územného plánovania štátov EÚ ako podklad pre tvorbu územnoplánovacej legislatívy v SR (I. etapa - Nemecko, Rakúsko, Veľká Británia a Holandsko). URBION Bratislava, Centrum priestorových a technických štúdií, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Foo K, Gallagher E, Bishop I, Kim AM (2015) Critical approaches to landscape visualization. Landscape and Urban Plann 142(Special Issue):244 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Godron M (1981) Patches and structural components for landscape ecology. Bioscience 31:733–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gercsák G (2011) GIS for the Ipoly River basin. In: Lin Jiun-Chuan (ed) Landscape conservation. Department of Geography, National Taiwan University, Taipei, pp 239–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Golley FB, Bellot J (1991) Interactions of landscape ecology, planning and design. Landscape and Urban Plann 21:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodzinski MD (2005) Piznannya landschaftu: misce i prostir (Understanding Landscape. Place and Space. In Ukrain). Kiev. U 2-x t. Vidavnicsho-poligrafichesky centr Kiivsky universitet. T.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunewald K, Bastian O (eds) (2015) Ecosystem services—concept, methods and case studies. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidelines for Land Use Planning (1993) Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, FAO Development Series 1, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Haase G (1978) Zur Ableitung und Kennzeichnung von Naturpotentialen. Petermann’s Geographische Mitteilungen, vol l22, pp 113–l25

    Google Scholar 

  • Haase G (1980) Izučenie topičeskich i choričeskich struktur, ich dinamiki i razvitija v landšaftnych sistemach. Structura, dinamika i razvitije landšaftov. Institut geografii AN SSSR, Moskva, pp 57–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Haase G (1991) Naturraumerkundung und Landnutzung. Geochorologische Verfahren zur Analyse. Kartierung und Bewertung von Naturräumen. Beiträge zur Geographie. Berlin, 34, I und II

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber W (1980) Entwicklung und Probleme der Kulturlandschaft im Spiegel ihrer Ökosysteme. Forsiarchiv 51(12):245–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber W (1990) Using landscape ecology in planning and management. In: Zonneveld S, Forman RTT (eds) Changing landscapes on ecological perspective. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 217–232

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haber W (2005) Landscape ecology and sustainability research. Z.f Geomorph. N.F. Suppl. Berlin, Stuttgart, vol 139, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber W (2008) Naturschutz in der Kulturlandschaft – ein Widerspruch in sich? NatSch_KuLa. Laufener Spezialbeiträge 1(08):15–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Halada Ľ, Topercer J, Mederly P, Kartusek V (1995) Systém ekologickej kvality krajiny – ďalší prístup k manažmentu krajiny. Životné prostredie 29(5):271–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall P (1992) Urban and regional planning, 3rd edn. Routledge, London, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz K (1974) Strukturprinzipien in der Landschaftssphäre. Ein Beitrag zur Methodologie der physischen Geographie. Geogr Ber 71:100–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Hreško J, Bugár G, Petrovič F, Mederly P (2008) Endangering of abiotic complex as a basis for evaluation in the landscape-ecological plan of the Trenčín catastral area (Slovakia). Gospodarka surowcami mineralnymi 24(2):156–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Hreško J, Mederly P, Petrovič F (2003) Landscape ecological research with support of GIS tools in prepration of landscape-ecological plan (model area of the Považská Bystrica city). Ekológia (Bratislava) 22(2):195–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Hreško J et al (2015) Atlas archetypov krajiny Slovenska. Nitra, UKF

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrnčiarová T, Miklós L et al (1997) Ekologická únosnosť: metodika a aplikácia na 3 benefičných územiach. I.-IV. Ústav krajinnej ekológie SAV a Ministerstvo životného prostredia SR, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Huba M (1982) Štrnásť krokov na ceste za krajinným plánom. Geografický časopis 34:45–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunziker M, Buchecker M, Hartig T (2007) Space and place—two aspects of the human-landscape relationship. In: Kienast F, Wildi O, Ghosh S (eds) A changing world. Challenges for landscape research, vol 8, Landscape Series. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 47 –62

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynek A (2009) Prostorovosti: místa, krajiny, regiony. Acta Geographica Universitatis Comenianae No. 53:123–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynek A (2010) Krajina: objekt, nebo konstrukt? In: Herber V (ed) Fyzickogeografický sborník 8, Fyzická geografie a kulturní krajina. MU, Brno, pp 138–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynek A (2011a) Geografie, Geograficita – prostorovosti. In: Svobodová H (ed) (2011) Prostorovost: místa, území, krajiny, regiony, globiony. Sborník príspěvku z konference. GaREP, s.r.o. Brno, pp 6–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynek A (2011b) Nazorova diverzita v chapani krajiny souvztažnost prostorovosti krajiny. In: Kolejka J et al (eds) Krajina Česka a Slovenska v sou.asnem vyzkumu. Masarykova univerzita, Pedagogicka fakulta, Brno, pp 12–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynek A, Trnka P (1981) Topochory Dyjské částí Znojemska. Folia Facultatis scientiarum naturalium Universitatis Purkynianae Brunensis – Geographia, Brno, 22, 4:99

    Google Scholar 

  • Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Second periodic reports submitted by States parties under articles 16 and 17 of the Covenant. Slovakia. 2009. UN Economic and Social Coucil, Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights E/C.12/SVK/2

    Google Scholar 

  • Isachenko AG (1981) Predstavlenije o geosisteme v sovremennoj fizičeskoj geografiji. Izv. VGO (Leningrad) 113(4), 297–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson L, Echeverria C, Nahuelhual L, Luque S (2014) Ecosystem services in changing landscapes: an introduction. Landsc Ecol 29:181–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izakovičová Z (1996) Landscape territorial system. Management and protection of environment. Faculty of Natural Sciences Comenius University, Bratislava, pp 285–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Izakovičová Z, Mederly P, Petrovič F (2017) Long-term land use changes driven by urbanisation and their environmental effects (example of Trnava city, Slovakia). Sustainability: Open Access Journal [elektronický zdroj], 2017, vol 9, no 9, article no 1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izakovičová Z, Miklós L, Drdoš J (1997) Krajinnoekologické podmienky trvalo udržateľného rozvoja. Veda, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Izakovičová Z, Moyzeová M (2007) Landscape-ecologically optimal spatial and functional organisation of landscape in the Tatry Biospeher Reserve of UNESCO. In: Guziová Z (ed) Priorities for conservation of biodiversity in biosphere reserves in changing conditions, Proceedings from the conference Stará Lesná, Tatry Biosphere Reserve, Slovakia, 2–6 June 2007. Institute of landscape ecology SAS, Bratislava, Slovak National Committee for UNESCO MAB Programme, pp 113–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Izakovičová Z, Moyzeová M, Oszlányi J (2010) Problems in agricultural landscape management arising from conflicts of interest—a study in the Trnava region, Slovak Republic. Innovations in European rural landscapes. Springer, Heidelberg-Dordrecht-London-New York, pp 77–96

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Izakovičová Z et al (2000) Metodické pokyny na vypracovanie projektov regionálnych ÚSES a miestnych ÚSES. Združenie krajiny 21, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Izakovičová, Baránková Z, Dobrovodská M, Štefunková D, Babicová D, Moyzeová M, Petrovič F (2011a) Participation of local people on identifying the landscape values and future development in historical agricultural landscapes. Ekologia 30(1):216–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jančura P et al (1994) Manuál k metodickým pokynom pre spracovanie dokumentácií R-ÚSES. I.-V. diel.- SAŽP, odbor priestorového plánovania, Banská Bystrica

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development (2002) A/CONF.199/20. UN World Summit on Sustainable Development. Johannesburg, 26 August–4 September (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones KB, Zurlini G, Kienast F, Petrosillo I, Edwards T, Wade TG, B-l Li, Zaccarelli N (2013) Informing landscape planning and design for sustaining ecosystem services from existing spatial patterns and knowledge. Landscape Ecol 28:1175–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RHG (1996) Research priorities: scientific concepts and criteria. In: Perspectives on ecological networks. European Centre for Nature Conservation, series Man and Nature, vol 1, chapter 14, pp 51–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RHG, Pungetti G (2004) Ecological networks and greenways: concept, design, implementation. United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge, p 153

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kerényi A (2003) A földtudományok természetvédelmi feladatai az EU csatlakozás tükrében. Európai Úniós Csatlakozás és Földtudomány. Budapest, MTA Társadalomkutató Központ, pp 131–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerényi A (2007) Tájvédelem. – Pedellus Tankönyvkiadó, Debrecen

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoroshev A (2010) Multilevel analysis of landscape structure for land use decisions. In: Barancˇokova´ M, Krajčí J, Kollár J, Belčáková I (eds) Landscape ecology–methods, applications and interdisciplinary approach. Institute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, pp 99–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoroshev A, Koshcheeva A (2009) Landscape ecological approach to hierarchical spatial planning. Terra Spectra Plan Stud 1:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienast F, Wildi O, Ghosh S (ed) (2007) A changing world. Challenges for landscape research, vol 8, Landscape Series. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocsis K, Agárdi N, Koczó F, Mezei G, Nemerkényi Zs, Szabó R (2016a) MNA alaptérképétől a Web GIS-ig. In: Balázs B (ed) Theory meets practice in GIS (in Hungarian). Debrecen: Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocsis K, Agárdi N, Koczó F, Mezei GA, Nemerkényi Zs, Szabó R (2016b) Generalizálás géppel, vagy kézzel? - módszertani összehasonlítás Magyarország Nemzeti Atlasza példáján. In: Pajtókné Tari I, Tóth A (ed) Magyar Földrajzi Napok: Absztraktkötet : VIII. Magyar Földrajzi Konferencia. Budapest: Magyar Földrajzi Társaság, p 103

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolektív autorov (2008) Katalóg tried objektov ZB GIS. Úrad geodézie, kartografie a katastra SR, Bratislava, Topografický ústav, Banská Bystrica

    Google Scholar 

  • Koncepcia tvorby, aktualizácie a správy ZB GIS na roky 2006–2010. Úrad geodézie, kartografie a katastra SR (2006) Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Konečný M, Kubíček P, Duda P, Herman L, Kolář M, Kozel J, Mulíčková M, Řezník T, Stachoň Z, Štampach R, Štěrba Z (2012) Datové infrastruktury pro prostorově informační společnost. Masarykova univerzita, Brno

    Google Scholar 

  • Koresawa A, Konvitz J (2001) Towards a new role for spatial planning. In: Organisation for economic co-operation and development: towards a new role for spatial planning. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozová M, Bedrna Z (ed) (2003) Krajinnoekologické metódy v regionálnom environmentálnom hodnotení. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozová M, Hrnčiarová T, Drdoš J et al (2007) Landscape ecology in Slovakia. Development, current state, and perspectives. monograph. Contribution of the Slovak Landscape Ecologists to the IALE World Congress 2007 and to the 25th Anniversary of IALE. Ministry of the Environment of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava, Slovak Association for Landscape Ecology—IALE-SK, 2007, CD ROM

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozová M, Pauditšová E, Mišíková P (2010) Vývoj prístupov a metód podporujúcich rozvoj krajinného plánovania a aktuálne výzvy ovplyvňujúce jeho ďalšie smerovanie. In: Krajinné plánovanie. STU, Bratislava, pp 31–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Krcho J (1968) Prírodná časť geosféry ako kybernetický systém a jeho vyjadrenia v mape 20(2):115–130 (Geografický časopis, Bratislava)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krcho J (1974) Štruktúra a priestorová diferenciácia fyzicko -geografickej sféry ako kybernetického systému 26(2):132–162 (Geografický časopis, Bratislava)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krcho J (1978) The spatial organisation of the physical-geographical sphere as a cybernetic system expressed by means of measure as entropy. Acta Fa Rer Nat Univ Comenianae, Geographica, 16, pp 57–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamine C (2011) Transition pathways towards a robust ecologization of agriculture and the need for system redesign. Cases from organic farming and IPM. J Rural Stud 27(2):209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land use planning applications (1991) Proceedings of the FAO expert consultation, Rome, 10–14 Dec 1990. World Soil Resources Reports 68. Rome, FAO

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer H (1990) Ecological bricks for our common house of Europe. Politische Ökologie, 8, No. 21, Sonderheft 2, Muenchen, Verlag f. Politische Oekologie, 62 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Langevelde van F (1994) Conceptual integration of landscape planning and landscape ecology, with a focus on the Netherlands. In: Cook EA, van Lier HN (eds) (1994) Landscape planning and ecological networks. Elsevier, Lausanne-New York-Oxford-Shannon-Tokyo, pp 27–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Leser H (1997) Landschaftsökologie. Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Lőw J (1984) Zásady pro vymezování a navrhování územních systému ekologické stability v územne plánovací projekcii. Agroprojekt, Brno

    Google Scholar 

  • Lőw J et al. (1984) Zásady pro vymezování a navrhování územních systému ekologické stability v územne plánovací projekcii. Agroprojekt, Brno

    Google Scholar 

  • Löw J et al (1995) Rukověť projektanta místního ÚSES. Agroprojekt, Brno

    Google Scholar 

  • Łowicki D, Mizgajski A (2013) Typology of physical-geographical regions in Poland in line with land-cover structure and its changes in the years 1990–2006. Geographia Polonica, Warszawa 86(3):255–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machar I, Kovář P (2010) Book of abstracts. In: International conference in landscape ecology “Landscape structures, functions and management: response to global ecological change”. Mendel University, Brno, CZ-IALE, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander Ü, Helming K, Wiggering H (eds) (2006) Multifunctional land use: meeting future demands for landscape goods and services. Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh WM (1997) Landscape planning: environmental applications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazúr E, Drdoš J, Urbánek J (1983) Krajinné syntézy - ich východiská a smerovanie. Geografický časopis 35:3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • McHarg I (1969) Design with nature, Garden City. N.Y. Published for the American Museum of Natural History. Natural Hystory Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mederly P et al (2015) Integrated valuation of ecosystem service as a for landscape management and decision making at regional and local level (Case study Trnava, Slovakia). In: Ecosystem service for nature, people and prosperity, ecosystem services partnership

    Google Scholar 

  • Mederly P, Krautschneider J, Halada Ľ et al (2012) Projekt pozemkových úprav v k.ú, Jasenica. Všeobecné zásady funkčního usporiadania územia. Regioplán, Nitra; Ekoped, Žilina

    Google Scholar 

  • Mederly P, Hudeková Z (2005) Sustainable urban development in the Slovak Republic: proposal of set of indicators and their application in order to evaluate the sustainable development of cities. Bratislava, REC

    Google Scholar 

  • Metodické pokyny na projektovanie územných systémov ekologickej stability (1993) Ministerstvo životného prostredia SR, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Mičian Ľ (1982) A system approach to landscape and the sciences realizing it to the system of geographical sciences. In: VIth international symposium on problems of landscape ecological research. Oct 1982, Piešťany, Institute of Experimental Biology and Ecology SAS, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L (1978) Náčrt biologického plánu povodia Gemerských Turcov. VEDA, Bratislava, Questiones Geobiologicae 21:127

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L (1988) Space and position—scene of the origin of spatial ecological landscape problems. Bratislava, Ecology (CSSR) 7(4):381–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L (1991) Zásady slovenskej ekologickej politiky. Životné prostredie (Bratislava) 25(4):174–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L (1992) Protecting the Environment during Regional Development. In: Vasko T (ed) Problems of economic transition. Regional Development in Central and Eastern Europe. Chapter 5. AVEBURY, Aldershot—Brookfield USA—Hongkong—Singapore—Sydney, pp 51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L (2011a) The environmental policy of the Slovak Republic after the Velvet Revolution. Životné prostredie 45(6):295–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L (2011b) the landscape in the international and slovak environmental politics. Životné prostredie 45(6):307–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L et al (1985) Ekologický generel ČSSR. Časť SSR. I. etapa: Priestorová diferenciácia územia z ekologického hľadiska. Záverečná správa P16-121-402/01. ČSŽP Bratislava. ÚEBE CBEV SAV Bratislava, Stavoprojekt Banská Bystrica

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L et al (1986) Ekologický plán VSN. Súbor grafických výstupov. Ekologická optimalizácia využívania VSN. IV. diel. ÚEBE SAV, Bratislava—Slovosivo

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L, Diviaková A, Izakovičová Z (2011) Ekologické siete a územný systém ekologickej stability. Vydavateľstvo TÚ vo Zvolene

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L, Hrnčiarová T (eds) (2002) Atlas krajiny Slovenskej republiky. 1. vydanie, MŽP SR Bratislava, SAŽP Banská Bystrica

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L, Izakovičová Z (1997) Krajina ako geosystém. Veda SAV, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L, Izakovičová Z et al (2006) Atlas reprezentatívnych geoekosystémov Slovenska, ÚKE SAV, MŽP SR, MŠ SR Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L, Kočická E, Diviaková A, Belaňová E (2011b) Integrated Landscape Management. Institutional Tools (in Slovak)..VKÚ, a.s., Harmanec

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L, Kočická E, Kočický D, Diviaková A (2015) Geosystémy ako krajinnoekologická základňa pre integrovaný manažment krajiny. Vydavateľstvo Technickej Univerzity vo Zvolene

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L, Špinerová A (2011) Krajinno-ekologické plánovanie LANDEP [The Landscape-ecological Planning LANDEP]. Harmanec, VKU

    Google Scholar 

  • Minár J, Tremboš P (1995) Evaluation of the natural hazards in the landscape planning. Acta Environmentalica Univ Comenianae 4(5):211–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizgajski A, Markuszewska I (ed) (2010) Implementation of landscape ecological knowledge in practice. The problems of landscape ecology, vol XXVIII. Polish Association for Landscape Ecology, Wydawnictvo Naukowe Adam Miczkiewicz University in Poznań

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyzeová M (2008) Príklad revitalizácie poľnohospodárskej krajiny. In: Herber V (ed) Fyzickogeografický zborník 6. Fyzická geografie a trvalá udžitelnost. Příspevky z 25. výroční konference Fyzickogeografické sekce České geografické společnosti konané 31. a 31. ledna 2008 v Brne. Masarykova Univerzita v Brne, Brno, pp 34–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI (2012) Landscape as medium and method for synthesis in urban ecological design. Landscape and Urban Plann 106:221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI (ed) (1997) Placing nature: culture and landscape ecology. Island Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Opdam P (2008) Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecol 23:633–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z, Lieberman A (1993) Landscape ecology—theory and application. Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, London, Paris, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Barcelona, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Neef E (1967) Die theoretischen Grundlagen der Landschaftslehre. Haack, Gotha/Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Neef, E., Richter, H., Barsch, H., Haase, G. (1973). Beitrage zur Klärung der Terminologie in der Landschaftsforschung. Beitrag d. Institut d. Geographie and Geoökologie d. Akad. d Wiss. d. DDR. Annex to Proceedings of IIIrd International Symposium on the Landscape Ecological Research. Práce a materiály z biológie krajiny No. 20, UBK SAV Bratislava, 28 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesshöver C, Assmuth T, Irvine KN, Rusch GM, Waylen KA, Delbaere B, Haase D, Jones-Walters L, Keune H, Kovacs E, Krauze K, Külvik M, Rey F, van Dijk J, Vistad Odd I, Wilkinson M, Wittmer H (2017) The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: an interdisciplinary perspective. Sci Total Environ 579:1215–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman P, Thornley A (1996) Urban planning in Europe: International competition, national systems and planning projects. Routledge, London, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Opdam P, Foppen R, Vos C (2002) Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol 16(8):767–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oťaheľ J (1978) Fyzickogeografická regionalizácia Liptovskej kotliny. Questiones Geobiologicae. Problémy biológie krajiny, 20. Veda, vydavateľstvo SAV

    Google Scholar 

  • Oťaheľ J (1994) Problémy environmentálneho plánovania (regionálne riešenia) In: Trvaloudržateľný rozvoj a krajinnoekologické plánovanie v európskych horských regiónoch, 1994. TU Zvolen, pp 166–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Oťaheľ J, Lehotský M, Ira V (1997) Environmental planning: proposal for procedure (case studies. In Ekológia (Bratislava), 16(4):403–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrovič F et al (2011) Environmentálne hľadiská trvalo udržateľného rozvoja. Nitra, UKF

    Google Scholar 

  • Plány manažmentu povodňových rizík čiastkových povodí (2015) Ministerstvo životného prostredia, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Plán manažmentu správneho územia povodia Dunaja (2015) Aktualizácia. Ministerstvo životného prostredia, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Preobrazhensky VS, Minc AA (1973) Sootnoshenye ponyaty geosystema a ekosystema. In: Práce a materiály z biológie krajiny 20. In: Proceedings of IIIrd international symposium on the Landscape Ecological Research. ÚBK SAV, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Preobrazhensky VS (1983) A system orientation of landscape research in geography and its present-day realization. In: Drdoš J (ed) Landscape synthesis. Geoecological Foundations of the Complex Landscape Management, VEDA, Bratislava, pp 31–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao MV, Suresh Babu V, Suman Chandra S, Ravindra Chary G (2015) Integrated land use planning for sustainable agriculture and rural development. Apple Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rega C (ed) (2014) Ladscape planning and rural development. Springer International Publishing, SpringerBriefs in Geography

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitsmaa RF (1990) Functional classification of space. Aspects of site suitability assesment in a decission support environment. RR-90-2, IIASA, Laxenburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Resolution of the European Parliament from 26th Oct 1990 on spatial planning. Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Ružička M, Miklós L (1982) Metodické poznatky ekologického hodnotenia územia pre zónu a sídelný útvar (na príklade Rimavskej Soboty). Acta Ecologica, 9, 26, 74 pp (VEDA, Bratislava)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ružička M, Miklós L (1982a) Metodické poznatky ekologického hodnotenia územia pre zónu a sídelný útvar (na príklade Rimavskej Soboty). VEDA, Bratislava, Acta Ecologica, 9(26):74

    Google Scholar 

  • Ružička M, Miklós L (1982b) Landscape-Ecological Planning (LANDEP) in the Process of Territorial Planning. Ekológia (ČSSR), l:297–3l2

    Google Scholar 

  • Richling A, Solon J (1993) Ekologia krajobrazu. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Ružička M et al (2010) Krajinná ekológia ako vedecký základ krajinného plánovania. Krajinné plánovanie. Bratislava, STU p, pp 5–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Ružicka M, Miklós L (l979) Teoretické a metodologické základy biologického plánovania krajiny. Záverecná správa úlohy VI-3-5/1. Bratislava, ÚEBE SAV

    Google Scholar 

  • Ružička M, Miklós L (1990) Basic premises and methods in landscape-ecological planning and optimisation. In: Zonnenveld IS, Forman RTT (ed) Changing landscapes: an ecological perspectives. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 233–260

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ružička M, Ružičková H, Žigrai F (1978) Krajinné zložky, prvky a štruktúra v biologickom plánovaní krajiny In: Quaestiones Geobiologicae. Veda SAV, Bratislava, pp 9–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Ružičková H, Haľada Ľ, Jedlička L, Kalivodová E (eds) (1996) Biotopy Slovenska. Príručka k mapovaniu a katalóg biotopov. ÚKE SAV, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Ružičková H, Ružička M (1973) Druhotná štruktúra krajiny ako kritérium biologickej rovnováhy. Quaestiones geobiologicae 12:23–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilleci F, Todaro V, Lotta F (2017) Connected lands: new perspectives on ecological networks planning. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt C (1993) On Economization and Ecologization as Civilizing Processes. Environ Values 2(1):33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber KF (1980) Brachflachen in der Kulturlandschaft. Daten und Dokumente zum Umweltschutz, Sonderreihe Umwelttaguug ‘Okologische Probleme in Agrarlandschaften’. Univ. Hohenheim 30:61–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberstein MA, Maser C (2013) Land-use planning for sustainable development, 2nd edn. CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklenička P (2003) Základy krajinného plánování. Vyd. Naděžda Skleničková, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • Snacken F, Antrop M (1983) Structure and dynamics of landscape systems. In: DRDOŠ J (ed) Landscape synthesis: Geoecological foundations of the complex landscape management. VEDA, Bratislava, pp 10–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Sochava VB (1977) Vvedenje v učenije o geosystemach Nauka, Novosibirsk

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg JH (2016) Hot air or comprehensive progress? a critical assessment of the SDGs. Sustainable development. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.10002/sd.1657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spatial Planning: Key Instrument for Development and Effective Governance with Special Reference to Countries in Transition (2008) UN publication, ECE/HBP/146. Economic Comission for Europe, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Špinerová A (2011) Prvky využitia zeme ako regulátor zón dynamiky svahu v modelovom území Ilijského potoka. Doktorská dizertačná práca, TU Zvolen

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer H (1995) Einführung in die räumliche Planung. UTB, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Špulerová J, Dobrovodská M, Izakovičová Z, Kenderessy P, Petrovič F, Štefunková D (2013) Developing a strategy for the protection of traditional agricultural landscapes based on a complex landscape-ecological evaluation (the case of a mountain landscape in Slovakia). Moravian Geogr Rep 21(4):15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Štefunková D (2011) Vybrané výsledky výskumu starej vinohradníckej krajiny Svätého Jura. In: Ekologické štúdie: Vedecký časopis venovaný aktuálnym problémom ekológie, krajinnej ekológie a príbuzných vedných disciplín 2(1–2):126–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Štefunková D, Hanušin J (2015) Analysis of the spatial and temporal distribution of selected landscape diversity indexes in detailed scale (Example Of Viticultural Landscape Svätý Jur). In: Halada Ľ, Bača A, Boltižiar M (eds) (2015) Landscape and landscape ecology. Proceedings of the 17th international symposium on landscape ecology. Institute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, pp 185–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabó SZ, Csorba P, Szilassi P (2012) Tools for landscape ecological planning—scale and aggregation sensitivity of the contagion type landscape metrics indices. Carpathian J Earth and Environ Sci 7(3):127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabó SZ, Csorba P, Varga K (2008) Landscape indices and landuse—tools for landscape managment. In: Plit J, Andreychouk V (ed) Methods of landscape research. Dissertations, Commission of Cultural Landscape 8:7–20, ISSN 1896-1460, Sosnowiec, Poland

    Google Scholar 

  • The future we want (2012) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 July 2012. A/RES/66/288. UN General Assembly

    Google Scholar 

  • The Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy (1995) Council of Europe, UNEP, ECNC, 50 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, MG (1990) Spatial and temporal analysis of the landscape patterns. Landscape Ecology 4(1):21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (2015) United Nations

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremboš P (1993) Potenciál krajiny, jeho hodnotenie a využitie v územno-plánovacej praxi. Životné prostredie 27:4l–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremboš P (1994) Krajinnoekologické podmienky a regionálny rozvoj. In: Trvaloudržateľný rozvoj a krajinnoekologické plánovanie v európskych horských regiónoch. TU vo Zvolene, pp 163–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Tress B, Tress G (2001) Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research. Landscape and Urban Plann 57:143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tress B, Tress G (2002) Disciplinary and meta-disciplinary approaches in landscape ecology. In: Bastian O, Steinhardt U (eds) Development and perspectives of landscape ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 25–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsybuliak AG (2015) Ecologizing parameters of the world economy. Eur Sci Rev 1–3:163–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Millennium Declaration (2000). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. A/55/L.2

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheye W (ed) (2004) Land use, land cover and soil sciences. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). UNESCO-EOLSS Publishers, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Veteikis D, Kavaliauskas P, Skorupskas R (2015) Assessing the optimality of landscape structure in a landscape plan (a Lithuanian example) In: Halada Ľ, Bača A, Boltižiar M (eds) Landscape and landscape ecology. Proceedings of the 17th international symposium on landscape ecology. Institute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, pp 348–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrasztó Z (1979) Land formation and the geological aspects of environmental protection. Symposium changes of the geological environment under the influence of man´s activity. IAEG National group, Krakow-SandomierzBelchatow-Plock-Warszawa, pp 135–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrasztó Z (2017) Holisztikus környezeti modellezés kartográfiai, GIS és távérzékelési módszerek alkalmazásával. Remote Sens 7(1):490–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Vodný plán Slovenskej republiky (2009) Plán manažmentu správneho územia povodia Dunaja. Plán manažmentu správneho územia povodia Visly. MŽP SR. Eds. VÚVH, SAŽP, Vydavateľstvo SAŽP

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrmann B (ed) (2012) Land use planning. Concept, tools and applications. BMZ. GIZ Deutsche Gesslschsft fur internationale Zusamenarbeit GmBH on behalf of the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development BMZ. Bonn-Eschborn

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams RH (1996) European Union spatial policy and planning. Paul Chapman Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrbka T, Erb KH, Schulz NB, Peterseil J, Hahn CO, Haberl H (2004) Linking pattern and process in cultural landscapes. An empirical study based on spatially explicit indicators. Land Use Policy 21:289–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (2013) Key concepts and research topics in landscape ecology revisited: 30 years after the Allerton Park workshop. Landscape Ecol 28:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young A (1986) Land evaluation and diagnosis and design: towards a reconciliation of procedures. Soil Surv Land Eval 5:61–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Young A (1993) Guidelines for land use planning. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. FAO Development Series 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld IS (1981) Land(scape) ecology, a science or a state of mind. In: Tjallingii SP, de Veer AA (ed) Perspectives in landscape ecology. Proceedings of the international congress organized by the Netherlands society for landscape ecology, Veldhoven 1981, pp 9–15; Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld IS (1995) Land ecology: an introduction to landscape ecology as a base for land evaluation, land management and conservation. SPB Publishing, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld IS, Forman RTT (eds) (1990) Changing landscapes: an ecological perspectives. Springer Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Žigrai F (1994) Landschaftsoekologische Planung als Instrument der nachhaltigen Entwicklung in Gebirgsregionen. In: Trvaloudržateľný rozvoj a krajinnoekologické plánovanie v európskych horských regiónoch. TU Zvolen, pp 135–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Žigrai F (1995) Integračný význam štúdia využitia zeme v geografii a ekológii na príklade modelového územia Lúčky pri Liptove. In: Drgoňa V (ed) Geographical studies 4. University of Education, Nitra

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia

    László Miklós

  2. Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia

    Anna Špinerová

Authors
  1. László Miklós
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna Špinerová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to László Miklós .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Miklós, L., Špinerová, A. (2019). Principles, Theoretical and Methodological Background of Landscape-ecological Planning. In: Landscape-ecological Planning LANDEP. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94021-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation