Job Design and Ergonomic Risk in Administrative Jobs

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 792)


There are many administrative workers exposed to awkward postures due to poor design of work stations and bad postural habits. We proceeded to evaluate work stations by applying the RULA methodology and the Check List ROSA and it was found that 87.5% of positions needed immediate changes in its design and its occupants more information on postural hygiene. The body segments with the highest postural load are wrists, upper arms, neck and trunk.

It is also necessary that an anthropometric profile of the Ecuadorian population can be developed so that in the future furniture and accessories can be designed according to the dimensions of our users to eliminate the current imbalance and reduce the incidence and prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders.


Ergonomic risk Anthropometry Postural load 


  1. 1.
    Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo: Encuesta Nacional de Condiciones de Trabajo 6a EWCS España. EWCS, Madrid (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allie, P.: Computer display viewing angles: is it time to shed a few degrees? In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 798–802 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Censos: Resultados del Censo 2010 de población y vivienda en el Ecuador. Fascículo Provincial Pichincha. INEC. Quito (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dowell, W.: An estimation of lumbar height and depth for the design os seating. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting, pp. 409–411 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu, H.: VDT positions: effect on performance and comfort. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual, pp. 397–400 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McAtamney, L.: RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl. Ergon. 24(2), 91–99 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Robertson, M.: Designing VDT operator training programs for preventing work related musculoskeletal disorder. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, pp. 429–433 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shute, S.: Effects of adjustable furniture on VDT users. Hum. Factors 26, 157–170 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sonne, M.: Development and evaluation of an office ergonomic risk checklist: ROSA - rapid office strain assessment. Appl. Ergon. 43(1), 98–108 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stammerjohn, L.: Evaluation of work station design factors in VDT operations. Hum. Factors 23, 401–412 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Internacional SekQuitoEcuador
  2. 2.Universidad San Francisco de QuitoQuitoEcuador

Personalised recommendations