Advertisement

Optimizing the Workstation of a Dentist

Conference paper
  • 677 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 792)

Abstract

This study is concerned with optimizing a working postures of a female dentist aged 51, with 20 years of experience. The investigation was performed based on interaction in ergonomics and each layer was assessed by using the most appropriate methods. The user was assessed through Body Part Discomfort, task analysis, time analysis, and RULA. Also the instruments, work place and physical environment were assessed. Data were collected through observation, interviews and questionnaire. The problems were then diagnosed; correspondingly, relevant solutions were suggested. With regard to the available facilities, a number of modifications were applied. Then reassessment took place and the results of assessment and reassessment were compared. As expected, the results revealed that, the working posture of dentist had been well optimized following the modifications, which led to significant reduction in the user’s exhaustion and musculoskeletal problem. The efficiency and working satisfaction of the dentist also surprisingly increased.

Keywords

Workstation Musculoskeletal HTA RULA 

References

  1. 1.
    Wearsted, M., Westgaard, R.H.: Working hours as a risk factor in the development of musculoskeletal complaints. Ergonomics 34(3), 265–276 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hagberg, M., Silverstein, B., Wells, R., Smith, R., Carayon, P., Hendrick, H.P., Perusse, M., Kuorinka, I., Forcier, L.: Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSD): A Handbook for Prevention. Taylor and Francis, London (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choobineh, A., Shahnavaz, H., Lahmi, M.: Major health risk factors in Iranian handwoven carpet industry. JOSE 10(1), 65–78 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spielholz, P., Silverstein, B., Morgan, M., Checkoway, H., Kaufman, J.: Comparison of self-report, video observation and direct measurement methods for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder physical risk factors. Ergonomics 44(6), 588–613 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murphy, D.: Safety and Health for Production Agriculture. St. Joseph., ASAE, MO (1992)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balch, A., Coulter, B., Duffner, A., Fackelmann, T., Goggins, R., Hays, J., Joyce, M., Mehring, J., Plott, C., Simonton, K., Tillman, B., Wilder, P.: Practical solutions for a safer workplace. WISHA Services Division Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Valachi, B., Valachi, K.: Mechanisms leading to musculoskeletal disorders in dentistry. J. Am. Dental Assoc. 134, 1344–1350 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cordiner, L., Davies, S., Haines, H., Haslegrave, C., Hide, S., Wilson, J.: A distance learning course on the fundamentals and practice of ergonomics. Ergonomic application in the workplace (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McAtamney, L., Corlett, E.N.: RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl. Ergon. 24(2), 91–99 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gaynor, M.: Meditation and Music for Sound Health. Sound Medicine Series (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial DesignKish International Campus, University of TehranKish IslandIran

Personalised recommendations