The Need for Ergonomic Studies for the Reduction of Injuries and Redesign of Tools in the Agricultural Sector Through TRIZ

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 792)


The importance of the prevention of ergonomic risks in the agricultural sector makes it necessary to carry out studies and have adequate tools to reduce them. Accidents related to inadequate ergonomic conditions at work in the field, whether in agricultural or livestock activities, are considered as factors that affect productivity. The aim of this study is to describe the importance of ergonomic risk prevention in the development of multinutritional blocks for cattle in the Huasteca area in north of Veracruz, Mexico. Using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment Methods (RULA), Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) and Job Strain Index (JSI) a group of people dedicated to the livestock sector, were evaluated in order to determine ergonomic risk indexes. With the use of the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ), was designed an ergonomic compactor that reduces over stress and possible injuries, allowing the worker to perform his task easily and comfortably.


Anthropometry Musculoskeletal disorders Ergonomic design TRIZ 



The authors express their sincere gratitude to the group of workers for their immense cooperation during this study and The Instituto Tecnologico Superior de Tantoyuca for the support.


  1. 1.
    Jain, R., Meena, M.L., Dangayach, G.S.: Ergonomic intervention for manual harvesting in agriculture: a review. In: Ergonomics in Caring for People: Proceedings of the International Conference on Humanizing Work and Work Environment, p. 183. Springer (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ganesh, S., Chhabra, D., Kumari, N.: The effectiveness of rehabilitation on pain-free farming in agriculture workers with low back pain in India. Work 55(2), 399–411 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Trask, C., Bath, B., Milosavljevic, S., Kociolek, A.M., Predicala, B., Penz, E., Whittington, L.: Evaluating swine injection technologies as a workplace musculoskeletal injury intervention: a study protocol. BioMed Research International (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Trask, C., Bath, B., Johnson, P.W., Teschke, K.: Risk factors for low back disorders in Saskatchewan farmers: field-based exposure assessment to build a foundation for epidemiological studies. JMIR Res. Protoc. 5(2), e111 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kong, Y.K., Lee, S.Y., Lee, K.S., Kim, D.M.: Comparisons of ergonomic evaluation tools (ALLA, RULA, REBA and OWAS) for farm work. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 24, 1–6 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Regazzoni, D., Russo, D.: TRIZ tools to enhance risk management. Procedia Eng. 9, 40–51 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blackburn, T.D., Mazzuchi, T.A., Sarkani, S.: Using a TRIZ framework for systems engineering trade studies. Syst. Eng. 15(3), 355–367 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Das, B., Gangopadhyay, S.: Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and physiological stress among adult, male potato cultivators of West Bengal. India. Asia Pac. J. Public Health 27(2), NP1669–NP1682 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jo, H., Baek, S., Park, H.W., Lee, S.A., Moon, J., Yang, J.E., Kim, K.S., Kim, J.Y., Kang, E.K.: Farmers’ cohort for agricultural work-related musculoskeletal disorders (farm) study: study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled subjects. J. Epidemiol. 26(1), 50–56 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Osborne, A., Blake, C., Fullen, B.M.: Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among farmers: a systematic review. Am. J. Ind. Med. 55(2), 143–158 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tosetto, T., Camarotto, J.A.: Ergonomics and design in the Brazilian agricultural sector: a proposal to build matrix of contradictions. Work 41(Suppl. 1), 5339–5346 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moore, J.S., Garg, A.: The strain index: a proposed method to analyze jobs for risk of distal upper extremity disorders. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 56(5), 443–458 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bukham, I.: TRIZ Technology for Innovation, Editorial Cubic Creativity (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Tecnológico Superior de TantoyucaTantoyucaMexico
  2. 2.Universidad Politécnica de HuejutlaHuejutla de ReyesMexico
  3. 3.Instituto Tecnológico de OrizabaOrizabaMexico

Personalised recommendations