Skip to main content

Identifying Suitable Representation Techniques for the Prioritization of Requirements and Their Interdependencies for Multiple Software Product Lines

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Information Systems (BIS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 320))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2868 Accesses

Abstract

Software requirements typically do not exist independently of each other, rather most requirements have some type of dependency on another requirement [4]. For companies developing software products, which depend on each other, in so-called multiple software product lines (SPLs), systematic requirements management, including consideration for prioritization and interdependencies, is a time-consuming and convoluted task. Representation techniques for complex requirements can convey critical requirements interdependency information to make prioritization of requirements quicker and more accurate [1]. Based on reviewing the foremost literature, this paper identifies the representation techniques for requirements management which are most suitable for multiple software product lines (SPLs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Carlshamre, P., Sandahl, K., Lindvall, M., Regnell, B., och Dag, J.: An industrial survey of requirements interdependencies in software product release planning. In: Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Symposium, Requirements Engineering (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mougouei, D., Powers, D.M., Moeini, A.: Dependency-aware software release planning. In: IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference Software Engineering Companion (ICSE-C), 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bagnall, A.J., Rayward-Smith, V.J., Whittley, I.M.: The next release problem. Inf. Softw. Technol. 43(14), 883–890 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carlshamre, P., Regnell, B.: Requirements lifecycle management and release planning in market-driven requirements engineering processes. In: 11th International Workshop Database and Expert Systems Applications, Proceedings (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schirmeier, H., Spinczyk, O.: Challenges in software product line composition. In: 42nd Hawaii International Conference, System Sciences, HICSS 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Damiani, F., Schaefer, I., Winkelmann, T.: Delta-oriented multi software product lines. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Software Product Line Conference, vol. 1 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Soomro, S., Hafeez, A., Shaikh, A., Musavi, S.H.A.: Ontology based requirement interdependency representation and visualization. In: Shaikh, F.K., Chowdhry, B.S., Zeadally, S., Hussain, D.M.A., Memon, A.A., Uqaili, M.A. (eds.) IMTIC 2013. CCIS, vol. 414, pp. 259–270. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10987-9_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Berander, P., Andrews, A.: Requirements prioritization. In: Aurum, A., Wohlin, C. (eds.) Engineering and Managing Software Requirements, pp. 69–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28244-0_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Sellier, D., Mannion, M., Mansell, J.X.: Managing requirements inter-dependency for software product line derivation. Requirements Eng. 13(4), 299–313 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenmüller, M., Siegmund, N., Kästner, C., ur Rahman, S.: Modeling dependent software product lines. In: Proceedings of the GPCE Workshop on Modularization, Composition and Generative Techniques for Product Line Engineering (McGPLE) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Achimugu, P., Selamat, A., Ibrahim, R., Mahrin, M.N.: A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56(6), 568–585 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahn, J., Rehman, I.: Comparison of requirement prioritization technique to find the best priorization technique. Modern Educ. Comput. Sci. 7(11), 53–59 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dahlstedt, A., Persson, A.: Requirements Interdependencies: State of the Art and Future Challenges. In: Aurum, A., Wohlin, C. (eds.) Engineering and Managing Software Requirements, pp. 95–116. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28244-0_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, H., Li, J., Zhu, L., Jeffery, R., Liu, Y., Wang, Q., Li, M.: Investigating dependencies in software requirements for change propagation analysis. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56(1), 40–53 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goknil, A., Kurtev, I., van den Berg, K., Veldhuis, J.: Semantics of trace relations in requirements models for consistency checking and inferencing. Softw. Syst. Model. 10(1), 31–54 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Saeki, M., Kaiya, H.: On Relationships among models, meta models, and ontologies. In: Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 6th OOPSLA Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling (DSM 2006) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pacheco, C., Garcia, I., Calvo-Manzano, J., Arcilla, M.: Reusing fuctional software requirements in small-sized software enterprises: a model oriented to the catalog of requirements. Requirements Eng. 22(2), 275–287 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Robertson, S., Robertson, J.: Mastering the Requirements Process, 6th edn. Addison-Wesley, Munich (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wiegers, K.: First things first: prioritizing requirements. Software Dev. 7(9), 48–53 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mougouei, D., Powers, D.: Modeling and selection of interdependent software requirements using fuzzy graphs. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19(6), 1812–1828 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Karlsson, J., Olsson, S., Ryan, K.: Improved practical support for large-scale requirements prioritising. Requirements Eng. 2(1), 51–60 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Valiris, G., Chytas, P., Glykas, M.: Making decisions using the balanced scorecard and the simple multi-attribute rating technique. Perform. Meas. Metrics 6(3), 159–171 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Lewellen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lewellen, S., Helfert, M. (2018). Identifying Suitable Representation Techniques for the Prioritization of Requirements and Their Interdependencies for Multiple Software Product Lines. In: Abramowicz, W., Paschke, A. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 320. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93931-5_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93931-5_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93930-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93931-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics