Skip to main content

Military Psychological Operations: Ethics and Policy Considerations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter addresses some basic ethical questions about psychological operations (PSYOP). It defines PSYOP, then compares and contrasts it with both conventional military activities and contemporary information warfare. Then it briefly clarifies emerging public policy problems, outlines relevant legal particularities, and offers general policy considerations with regard to ethical considerations in its employment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Allied Joint Doctrine for Information Operations AJP-3.10, Ch. I, §1.0102.

  2. 2.

    For a definition see, for example, George Lucas, Ethics and Cyber Warfare: The quest for responsible security in the age of digital warfare (NY: Oxford University Press, 2017), 23.

  3. 3.

    Jon Swaine “Georgia: Russia ‘conducting cyber war’”, The Telegraph, 11 August 2008.

  4. 4.

    Laurie Blank, “Media Warfare, Propaganda and the Law of War,” in Soft War: The Ethics of Unarmed Conflict, ed. Michael L. Gross and Tamar Meisels (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).

  5. 5.

    For an early analysis, see Malcolm Nance, The Plot to Hack America: How Putin’s cyberspies and WikiLeaks tried to steal the 2016 election (New York: Skyhorse Publishing, 2016).

  6. 6.

    See Lucas Ethics and Cyber Warfare, 31n14 for qualifications.

  7. 7.

    Sarah Fainberg, “Russian Spetsnaz, Contractors and Volunteers in the Syrian Conflict,” Russie.Nie.Visions, 105, (December 2017): 8.

  8. 8.

    We speak here of LOAC as the codification of JWT, while acknowledging that this is problematic.

  9. 9.

    Michael L. Gross, Soft War: The ethics of unarmed conflict (NY: Cambridge University Press. 2017), 217.

  10. 10.

    Shlomo Sher, “A Framework for Assessing Immorally Manipulative Marketing Tactics,” Journal of Business Ethics 102 (2011).

  11. 11.

    See Gross Soft War, for the term “soft war.”

  12. 12.

    Michael N. Schmitt (ed), Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013) and Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017).

  13. 13.

    Tallinn, Rule 10.

  14. 14.

    Tallinn, Rule 11 Comment 3.

  15. 15.

    This is not to say that no Cyber or PSYOP campaign can constitute an “act of force,” but that absent physical damage, the threshold will be extremely hard to meet.

  16. 16.

    Tallinn, Rule 9.

  17. 17.

    Department of Defense Law of War Manual, 2015, 60.

  18. 18.

    Tallinn Rule 9, comment 7.

  19. 19.

    Joint Doctrine Manual, Psychological Operations. B-GJ-005-313/FP-001.

  20. 20.

    Scot MacDonald, Propaganda and Information Warfare in the Twenty-First Century: Altered images and deception operations. (New York: Routledge, 2007), Ch. 4.

  21. 21.

    10 USC §2241a.

  22. 22.

    See Joint Publication 3–13; http://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp3_13.pdf

  23. 23.

    See NATO Psychological Operations Doctrine §V, 0112, the reservations on p VI, and especially Annex D §§2–3.

  24. 24.

    See Gross Soft War, 218ff, for other notions of “proportional” response that may be applicable in this context.

  25. 25.

    MacDonald, Propaganda, Ch. 9.

  26. 26.

    Michael L. Gross, Moral Dilemmas of Modern War: Torture, Assassination, and blackmail in an age of asymmetric conflict (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 55.

  27. 27.

    The views expressed in this chapter are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the US government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zelcer, M., VanPelt, G., Casey, D. (2018). Military Psychological Operations: Ethics and Policy Considerations. In: Boonin, D. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93907-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics