Skip to main content

Research of Behavior Style Based on Cognitive Conflict During Interaction Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 769 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 796))

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to research the behavior style facing to the cognitive conflict in the design team to enhance the production of better design solution. Based on an assisted design tool designed by Hunan University, the experiment is designed to research the influences of team behavior styles on the final design solution. The research methods include participatory design and oral report, and the experiment starts from the interaction gesture. According to results of the experiment, the Collaborating Team Behavior Style is able to meet the needs of users in the layers of usability and efficiency. Compared with it, Competing Team Behavior Style meets one more layer of experience. The application value of team behavior styles is found between the cognitive conflict and team of multiple roles. Based on the features of different team styles, the results are applied into the project in relevant design stages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jehn, K.A., Neale, M.A.: Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. J. Adm. Sci. Q. 44(4), 741–763 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jehn, K.A.: A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. J. Adm. Sci. Q. 42(3), 530–557 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lawson, B.: How Designers Think – The Design Process Demystified. J. Architectural Pr (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, S., Su, J.-N., Hu, C., et al.: Cognitive thinking model of designer based on generalized genetic algorithm. J. Lanzhou Univ. Technol. 40(4), 36–39 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas, K.W., Kilmann, R.H.: Thomas-Kilmann: Conflict Mode Instrument. J. CPP Inc., Sunnyvale (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dong-dong, Y.E., Shi-guo, L.I.: Hierarchy of needs and design strategy in interaction design. J. Packag. Eng. 8, 75–78 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Webler, T., Tuler, S., Krueger, R.: What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. J. Environ. Manag. 27(3), 435–450 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, Y., Pan, R.: The principle of gesture design in the interactive design of mobile terminals. J. Modern Decor. Theor. Discuss. 8, 178–179 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, G., Heng, X., Ling, Y., et al.: Interaction gesture analysis and design based on multi-touch surface. J. Appl. Res. Comput. 27(5), 1737–1739+1752 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Capra, M., Capra, M., Capra, M., et al.: Cultural similarities and differences in user-defined gestures for touchscreen user interfaces. In: CHI 2010 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 4015–4020. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61402159, 51605154).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengyu Tan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tan, Z., Liu, L., Jiang, Y. (2019). Research of Behavior Style Based on Cognitive Conflict During Interaction Design. In: Ho, A. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Communication of Design. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 796. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93888-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93888-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93887-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93888-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics