Advertisement

Research of Behavior Style Based on Cognitive Conflict During Interaction Design

  • Zhengyu TanEmail author
  • Lei Liu
  • Yangchen Jiang
Conference paper
  • 526 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 796)

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to research the behavior style facing to the cognitive conflict in the design team to enhance the production of better design solution. Based on an assisted design tool designed by Hunan University, the experiment is designed to research the influences of team behavior styles on the final design solution. The research methods include participatory design and oral report, and the experiment starts from the interaction gesture. According to results of the experiment, the Collaborating Team Behavior Style is able to meet the needs of users in the layers of usability and efficiency. Compared with it, Competing Team Behavior Style meets one more layer of experience. The application value of team behavior styles is found between the cognitive conflict and team of multiple roles. Based on the features of different team styles, the results are applied into the project in relevant design stages.

Keywords

Interaction design Cognitive conflict Behavior style Participatory design 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61402159, 51605154).

References

  1. 1.
    Jehn, K.A., Neale, M.A.: Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. J. Adm. Sci. Q. 44(4), 741–763 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jehn, K.A.: A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. J. Adm. Sci. Q. 42(3), 530–557 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lawson, B.: How Designers Think – The Design Process Demystified. J. Architectural Pr (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang, S., Su, J.-N., Hu, C., et al.: Cognitive thinking model of designer based on generalized genetic algorithm. J. Lanzhou Univ. Technol. 40(4), 36–39 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomas, K.W., Kilmann, R.H.: Thomas-Kilmann: Conflict Mode Instrument. J. CPP Inc., Sunnyvale (1974)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dong-dong, Y.E., Shi-guo, L.I.: Hierarchy of needs and design strategy in interaction design. J. Packag. Eng. 8, 75–78 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Webler, T., Tuler, S., Krueger, R.: What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. J. Environ. Manag. 27(3), 435–450 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, Y., Pan, R.: The principle of gesture design in the interactive design of mobile terminals. J. Modern Decor. Theor. Discuss. 8, 178–179 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, G., Heng, X., Ling, Y., et al.: Interaction gesture analysis and design based on multi-touch surface. J. Appl. Res. Comput. 27(5), 1737–1739+1752 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Capra, M., Capra, M., Capra, M., et al.: Cultural similarities and differences in user-defined gestures for touchscreen user interfaces. In: CHI 2010 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 4015–4020. ACM (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle BodyHunan UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.School of DesignHunan UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations