Abstract
Trust has been shown to play a key role in our ability to safely use autonomous vehicles; hence the authors used the Ideas Café to explore the factors affecting trust in autonomous vehicles. The Ideas Café is an informal collaborative event that brings the public together with domain experts for exploratory research. The authors structured the event around factors affecting trust in the technology, privacy and societal impact. The event followed a mixed methods approach using: table discussions, spectrum lines and line ups. 36 participants attended the Ideas Café event held at the Coventry Transport Museum in June 2017. Table discussions provided the key findings for Thematic Analysis as part of Grounded Theory; which found, contrary to current research trends, designing for the technology’s integration with society as equally important for trust as the vehicle design itself. The authors also reported on the emergent high level interface guidelines.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Petts, J.: Public engagement to build trust: false hopes? J. Risk Res. 11, 821–835 (2008)
Yang, K., Pandey, S.K.: Further dissecting the black box of citizen participation: when does citizen involvement lead to good outcomes? Public Adm. Rev. 71, 880–892 (2011)
Irwin, A.: Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Underst. Sci. 10, 1–18 (2001)
Inayatullah, S.: Six pillars: futures thinking for transforming. Foresight 10, 4–21 (2008)
Varum, C.A., Melo, C.: Directions in scenario planning literature–a review of the past decades. Futures 42, 355–369 (2010)
Held, D.: Democracy and the global order (1995)
Cooper, T.L., Bryer, T.A., Meek, J.W.: Citizen-centered collaborative public management. Public Adm. Rev. 66, 76–88 (2006)
Hoff, K.A., Bashir, M.: Trust in automation integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 57, 407–434 (2015)
Cranor, L.F.: A framework for reasoning about the human in the loop. In: UPSEC, vol. 8, pp. 1–15 (2008)
Strand, N., Nilsson, J., Karlsson, I.M., Nilsson, L.: Semi-automated versus highly automated driving in critical situations caused by automation failures. Veh. Autom. Driver Behav. 27, 218–228 (2014)
Khastgir S., Birrell S., Dhadyalla G., Jennings, P.: Calibrating trust to increase the use of automated systems in a vehicle. In: Stanton N., Landry S., Di Bucchianico, G., Vallicelli, A. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 484, pp. 535–546. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_45
Muir, B.M.: Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 27, 527–539 (1987)
Parasuraman, R., Manzey, D.H.: Complacency and bias in human use of automation: an attentional integration. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 52, 381–410 (2010)
Dzindolet, M.T., Peterson, S.A., Pomranky, R.A., Pierce, L.G., Beck, H.P.: The role of trust in automation reliance. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 58, 697–718 (2003)
Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G.: Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 4, 53–71 (2000)
Spain, R.D., Bustamante, E.A., Bliss, J.P.: Towards an empirically developed scale for system trust: Take two. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. Proc. 52(19), 1335–1339 (2008)
Fallon, C.K., Bustamante, E.A., Ely, K.M., Bliss, J.P.: Improving user trust with a likelihood alarm display. Presented at the proceedings of the 1st international conference on augmented cognition, Las Vegas, NV (2005)
McCarley, J.S., Wiegmann, D.A., Wickens, C.D., Kramer, A.F.: Effects of age on utilization and perceived reliability of an automated decision-making aid for luggage screening. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergono. Soc. Annu. Meet. 47(3), 340–343 (2003)
Hedges, A., Sykes, W., Groom, C.: Extending working life: changing the culture. Qualitative research into effective messages (2009). Department for Work and Pensions
Mechanic, D., Meyer, S.: Concepts of trust among patients with serious illness. Soc. Sci. Med. 51, 657–668 (2000)
Muñoz-Leiva, F., Luque-Martínez, T., Sánchez-Fernández, J.: How to improve trust toward electronic banking. Online Inf. Rev. 34, 907–934 (2010)
Rowe, G., Frewer, L.J.: A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 30, 251–290 (2005)
Brown, J., Isaacs, N.M.: Hosting conversations that matter at the world cafe. Whole Syst. Assoc. 1, 1–20 (2002)
Berthet, E.T., Barnaud, C., Girard, N., Labatut, J., Martin, G.: How to foster agroecological innovations? A comparison of participatory design methods. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 59, 280–301 (2016)
Berger, J., Fitzsimons, G.: Dogs on the street, pumas on your feet: how cues in the environment influence product evaluation and choice. J. Mark. Res. 45, 1–14 (2008)
Carlsson, A.M.: Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 16, 87–101 (1983)
Bryson, J.M., Anderson, S.R.: Applying large-group interaction methods in the planning and implementation of major change efforts. Public Adm. Rev. 60, 143–162 (2000)
Lee, J.D., See, K.A.: Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 46, 50–80 (2004)
Teacy, W.L., Patel, J., Jennings, N.R., Luck, M.: Travos: trust and reputation in the context of inaccurate information sources. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 12, 183–198 (2006)
Kalra, N., Paddock, S.M.: Driving to safety: how many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability? Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 94, 182–193 (2016)
Eigner, F., Maffei, M.: Differential privacy by typing in security protocols, pp. 272–286 (2013)
Bordia, P., Hunt, E., Paulsen, N., Tourish, D., DiFonzo, N.: Uncertainty during organizational change: is it all about control? Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 13, 345–365 (2004)
Choi, J.K., Ji, Y.G.: Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 31, 692–702 (2015)
Koo, J., Kwac, J., Ju, W., Steinert, M., Leifer, L., Nass, C.: Why did my car just do that? Explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 9, 269–275 (2014)
Schaefer, K.E., Chen, J.Y.C., Szalma, J.L., Hancock, P.A.: A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 58, 377–400 (2016)
Gibson, G.E., Whittington, D.A.: Charrettes as a method for engaging industry in best practices research. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 136, 66–75 (2010)
Asbury, J.-E.: Overview of focus group research. Qual. Health Res. 5, 414–420 (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ulahannan, A. et al. (2019). Using the Ideas Café to Explore Trust in Autonomous Vehicles. In: Ho, A. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Communication of Design. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 796. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93888-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93888-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93887-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93888-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)