Skip to main content

Astronaut Crew Selection: Group Cohesiveness, Deviation, Stress, and Conformity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 786))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2617 Accesses

Abstract

Long duration space travel (i.e., to Mars) requires that many human factors issues be resolved. The present laboratory experiment, examined the effect of group cohesiveness on conformity to a group norm. The experiment included 92 men and women in a 2 × 2 factorial design crossing High and Low Cohesiveness and Threat of Punishment for Non-Conformity. Stress responses were measured by cardiovascular measures. Deviation from the group increased stress responses; however, conformity did not decrease stress responses. Higher cohesiveness and threat of punishment were associated with greater conformity, but were not associated with stress. Greater systolic blood pressures responses were associated with greater conformity. Conformers showed greater stress response to deviation and attraction to the group compared with non-conformers. These findings are relevant for possible approaches for crew selection for long duration space missions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kanas, N.: Group interactions during space missions. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 75(Suppl. 7), C3–C5 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kanas, N., Salnitskiy, V.P., Boyd, J.E., Gushin, V.I., Weiss, D.S., Saylor, S.A., Kozerenko, O.P., Marmar, C.R.: Crewmember and mission control personnel interactions during International Space Station missions. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 78, 601–607 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. De La Torre, G.G., van Baarsen, B.B., Ferlazzo, F., Kanas, N., Weiss, K., Schneider, S., Whiteley, I.: Future perspectives on space psychology: recommendations on psychosocial and neurobehavioural aspects of human spaceflight. Acta Astronaut. 81, 587–599 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Endler, N.S.: The joint effects of person and situation factors on stress in spaceflight. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 75(Suppl. 7), C22–C27 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S.I., Kozlowski, S.W., Miller, C.A., Mathieu, J.E., Vessey, W.B.: Teams in space exploration: a new frontier for the science of team effectiveness. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 24, 200–207 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sandal, G.M., Bye, H.H., van de Vijver, F.J.: Personal values and crew compatibility: results from a 105 days simulated space mission. Acta Astronaut. 69, 141–149 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Janis, I.: Groupthink. Psychol. Today, 5, 44–46, 74–76 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Festinger, L.: An analysis of compliant behavior. In: Sherif, M., Wilson, M.O. (eds.) Group Relations at the Crossroads. Harper & Brothers, New York (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Conners, M.M., Harrison, A.A., Akins, F.R.: Living Aloft: Human Requirements for Extended Spaceflight. Scientific and Technical Information Branch, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson, N.H.: Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 9, 272–279 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Back, K.W.: Influence through social communication. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 46, 9–23 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gormly, J.: Sociobehavioral and physiological response to interpersonal disagreement. J. Exp. Res. Pers. 5, 216–222 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Horowitz, M.: The recall of interrupted group tasks: an experimental study of individual motivation in relation to group goals. Hum. Relat. 7, 3–38 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Asch, S.E.: Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychol. Monogr. 70, 1–70 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, C.E.: A study of the autonomic excitation resulting from the interaction of individual opinion and group opinion. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 31, 138–164 (1936)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tuddenham, R.D., McBride, P.D.: The yielding experiment from the subject’s point of view. J. Pers. 27, 259–271 (1959)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson, R.: Personality patterns, source attractiveness, and conformity. J. Pers. 28, 186–199 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schroder, H.M., Hunt, D.E.: Dispositional effects upon conformity at different levels of discrepancy. J. Pers. 26, 243–258 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ross, L., Bierbrauer, G., Hoffman, S.: The role of attribution processes in conformity and dissent: revisiting the Asch situation. Am. Psychol. 31, 148–157 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schachter, S., Ellertson, N., McBride, D., Gregory, D.: An experimental study of cohesiveness and productivity. Hum. Relat. 4, 229–238 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Byrne, D.: The Attraction Paradigm. Academic Press, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Baum, A., Davidson, L.M., Singer, J., Street, S.: Stress as a psychophysiological process. In: Baum, A., Singer, J.E. (eds.) Handbook of Psychology and Health, Volume 5 Stress. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Crowne, D.P., Liverant, S.: Conformity under varying conditions of personal commitment. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 66, 547–555 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kiesler, C.A.: Attraction to the group and conformity to the group norm. J. Pers. 31, 559–569 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kiesler, C.A., Corbin, L.H.: Commitment, attraction, and conformity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2, 890–895 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bakeman, R., Helmreich, R.: Cohesiveness and performance: covariation and causality in an undersea environment. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 11, 478–489 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Radloff, R., Helmreich, R.: Groups Under Stress: Psychological Research in Sealab II. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Julian, J.W., Regula, C.R., Hollander, E.P.: Effects of prior agreement by others on task confidence and conformity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 9, 171–178 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hollander, E.P., Julian, J.W., Haaland, G.A.: Conformity process and prior group support. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2, 852–858 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Palaumbo, R.V., Marraccini, M.E., Weyandt, L.L., Wilder-Smit, O., McGee, H.A., Lou, S., Goodwin, M.S.: Interpersonal autonomic physiology: a systematic review of the literature. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev., 1–43 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Elkins, A.N., Muth, E.R., Hoover, A.W., Walker, A.D., Carpenter, T.L., Switzer, F.S.: Physiological compliance and team performance. Appl. Ergon. 40, 997–1003 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Henning, R.A., Armstead, A.G., Ferris, J.K.: Social psychophysiological compliance in a four-person research team. Appl. Ergon. 40, 1004–1010 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Henning, R.A., Boucsein, W., Gil, M.C.: Social-physiological compliance as a determinant of team performance. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 40, 231–232 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a fellowship from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Graduate Student Researchers Program. Thanks to Jerome E. Singer, Andrew Baum, Neil E. Grunberg, and Harry C. Holloway for their mentoring during the dissertation process and to the students, faculty, and administration of the USUHS Medical and Clinical Psychology Department for their assistance in all aspects of this work. Much appreciation to the International Space University community. Thanks to Charles F. Sheridan for his assistance in preparation of this manuscript. Thanks to Anacleta and Isabelo Sibolboro, Josephine and Nicola Mezzacappa, Maria DiLella, and Frieda Mezzacappa for their logistical support. Thanks to Isabelo Sibolboro, Jr. and Wilma Sell for their prayers. Gratitude to John, Lucia, and Philip Mezzacappa for their patience. Dedicated to Our Lady of the Highways.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Mezzacappa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mezzacappa, E. (2019). Astronaut Crew Selection: Group Cohesiveness, Deviation, Stress, and Conformity. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 786. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93884-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93885-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics