• Mandy DuncanEmail author


This opening chapter briefly describes the historical, political and social context within which children’s participation in the child protection system takes place. In some childhood institutions adopting the participatory agenda, at least superficially, has been seen as relatively uncontroversial but allowing children the freedom to participate within the context of statutory child protection interventions is complicated because participation potentially places children at risk. However, participation is also a means through which children can realise their rights to protection, not least because it allows them opportunities to increase capacity by developing decision making skills, confidence, articulation, social competence, social responsibility and resilience. This chapter includes a brief overview of the research project upon which the ensuing theory of children’s participation in child protection interventions was developed, and a brief overview of the analytical framework employed. The chapter also includes an explanation of the way that the book is structured and a synopsis of each of the chapters that follow. Part one of the book presents children’s accounts of their experiences of statutory child protection interventions and part two develops a theory for why children participate in the ways that they do.


  1. Archard, D. (1993). Children: Rights and Childhood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, M. (1995). Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, M. (2000). Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cossar, J., Brandon, M., & Jordan, P. (2014). ‘You’ve Got to Trust Her and She’s Got to Trust You’: Children’s Views on Participation in the Child Protection System. Child and Family Social Work. Scholar
  5. Council of Europe. (2012). Recommendation CM/Rec(2012)2 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the Participation of Children and Young People Under the Age of 18. Available at: Accessed March 27, 2016.
  6. Department for Education and Skills. (2003). Every Child Matters: Presented to Parliament by the Chief Secretary to the Treasury by Command of Her Majesty. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  7. Dillon, J., Greenop, D., & Hills, M. (2016). Participation in Child Protection: A Small Scale Qualitative Study. Qualitative Social Work, 15(1), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1990). The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  10. Franklin, B. (1997). The Ladder of Participation in Matters Concerning Children. In J. Boyden & J. Ennew (Eds.), Children in Focus: A Manual for Participatory Research with Children. Stockholm: Grafisk Press.Google Scholar
  11. Freeman, M. (1987). Taking Children’s Rights Seriously. Children and Society, 1(4), 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freeman, M. (1994). The Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 16(3), 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hart, R. (1992). Children’s Participation: From Tokenism to Citizenship. Florence: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  15. Healy, K. (1998). Participation and Child Protection: The Importance of Context. British Journal of Social Work, 28, 897–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lansdown, G. (1995). Taking Part: Children’s Participation in Decision-Making. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
  17. (1989). Children Act 1989. Available at: Accessed March 19, 2018.
  18. (2004). Children Act 2004. Available at: Accessed March 19, 2018.
  19. (2014). Children and Families Act. Available at: Accessed April 18, 2018.
  20. Oswell, D. (2013). The Agency of Children: From Family to Global Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Spyrou, S. (2011). The Limits of Children’s Voice: From Authenticity to Critical, Reflexive Representation. Childhood, 18(2), 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tisdall, K., & Punch, S. (2012). Not so ‘New’? Looking Critically at Childhood Studies. Children’s Geographies, 10(3), 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. London: UNICEF UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Staffordshire UniversityStoke-on-TrentUK

Personalised recommendations