Skip to main content

Pictorial and Alphabet Writings in Asymmetric Signaling Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1042 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10838))

Abstract

The goal of the paper is to differentiate the pictorial writings and alphabet writings (i.e. Chinese vs English) in signaling games. The idea is to emphasize the asymmetry of communicators’ different cognitive statuses while they are writing and reading by using these two types of languages. For fulfilling the idea, we study two variations of the standard evolutionary signaling game in order to incorporate players’ asymmetry on recognizing and learning signals. It is found that pictorial representation takes more advantages in the early stage of the development of a language, while alphabet representation works better in the long run.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this paper, we focus on writings.

  2. 2.

    This response rule is used in Zollman’s work [1] to study forgetting in evolutionary games.

  3. 3.

    The assumption of a different probability on the state set is essential. With the same probability on the states, the behavior of the two models are almost the same.

References

  1. Barrett, J., Zollman, K.J.S.: The role of forgetting in the evolution and learning of language. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 21(4), 293–309 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Crawford, V., Sobel, J.: Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50, 1431–51 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Crawfurd, J.: On the origin and history of written language. Trans. Ethnol. Soc. London 5, 96–104 (1867)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Downing, J.: Is literacy acquisition easier in some languages than in others? Visible Lang. 7(2), 145–154 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hoppe, F.M.: Polya-like urns and the Ewens sampling formula. J. Math. Biol. 20, 91–94 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Hung, D.L., Tzeng, O.J.: Orthographic variations and visual information processing. Psychol. Bull. 90(3), 377 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jäger, G., Metzger, L.P., Riedel, F.: Voronoi languages: equilibria in cheap-talk games with high-dimensional types and few signals. Games Econ. Behav. 73(2), 517–537 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Zabell, S.L., Alexander, J.M., Skyrms, B.: Inventing new signals. Dyn. Games Appl. 2(1), 129–145 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Zollman, K.J.S.: Talking to neighbors: the evolution of regional meaning. Philos. Sci. 1, 69–85 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis, D.: Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Muter, P., Johns, E.E.: Learning logographies and alphabetic codes. Hum. Learn. 4, 105–125 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  12. O’Connor, C.: Ambiguity is kinda good sometimes. Philos. Sci. 82(1), 110–121 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Connor, C.: The evolution of vagueness. Erkenntnis 79(4), 707–727 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Santana, C.: Ambiguity in cooperative signaling. Philos. Sci. 81(3), 398–422 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Scott, J.A., Ehri, L.C.: Sight word reading in prereaders: use of logographic vs. alphabetic access routes. J. Reading Behav. 22(2), 149–166 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Skyrms, B.: Signals: Evolotion, Learning and Information. Oxford University Press, New York (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith, F.: Phonology and orthography: reading and writing. Elementary Engl. 49(7), 1075–1088 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tang, L.: Ambuguity in compositional signaling. In: Working Paper (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tulving, E., Thomson, D.M.: Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychol. Rev. 80(5), 352 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge Kevin Zollman and Igor Yanovich whose helps and suggestions aided in the preparation of the manuscript. The author wishes to thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript. The research reported in this paper was supported by Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (17YJC72040004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liping Tang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tang, L. (2018). Pictorial and Alphabet Writings in Asymmetric Signaling Games. In: Arai, S., Kojima, K., Mineshima, K., Bekki, D., Satoh, K., Ohta, Y. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10838. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93794-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93794-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93793-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93794-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics