Abstract
This paper addresses the not infrequently voiced view that the immense usefulness of mathematics in the physical sciences constitutes a deep philosophical mystery, with potentially far-reaching implications concerning the relationship between the inquiring mind and the material world. It grants the broadly Humean point that the very possibility of inductive projection from past to future, by whatever intellectual means, must be considered a remarkable and perhaps inexplicable fact, but calls into question the idea that the utility of mathematics in this regard is especially baffling. While the aims pursued in pure mathematics may differ radically from those of engineers and scientists, in their development of concepts and theories mathematicians are nevertheless beholden to the same fundamental standards of simplicity and similarity that must govern any reasonable inductive projection; and this fact, it is suggested, may go a considerable way towards explaining why many mathematical constructs lend themselves to empirical application.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the general thrust of its argument – acknowledging the existence of a problem concerning reasoning in general, while calling into question the idea of mathematical reasoning being particularly problematic – the present paper bears some resemblance to Sarukkai (2005).
References
Chalmers, A. (2013). What is this thing called science? St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
Colyvan, M. (2001). The miracle of applied mathematics. Synthese, 127, 265–277.
Dyson, F. (1964). Mathematics in the physical sciences. Scientific American, 211(3), 128–147.
Feynman, R. (1967). The character of physical law. Cambridge, MA/London: The M.I.T. Press.
Goodman, N. (1955). Fact, ficion, and forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sarukkai, S. (2005). Revisiting the ‘unreasonable effectiveness’ of mathematics. Current Science, 88(3), 415–423.
Shankar, R. (2014). Fundamentals of physics: Mechanics, relativity, and thermodynamics. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
Steiner, M. (1989). The application of mathematics to natural science. The Journal of Philosophy, 86(9), 449–480.
Steiner, M. (1998). The applicability of mathematics as a philosophical problem. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wigner, E. (1960). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13(1), 1–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sandqvist, T. (2018). Reflections on the Empirical Applicability of Mathematics. In: Hansson, S. (eds) Technology and Mathematics. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93779-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93779-3_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93778-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93779-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)