Diversité, pertinence et efficacité des mécanismes internationaux de règlement des différends en matière économique

  • Catherine KessedjianEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law book series (GSCL, volume 30)


Economic actors have a great variety of dispute resolution methods at their disposal, whether their disputes are against a State or a private party. Efficiency is the key criterion for companies when choosing one mean of dispute resolution over the others. They also have the possibility to strategize their conflict resolution needs and may launch different proceedings one after the other if the previous one did not give them satisfaction. Some may find this unacceptable but, unless clear rules are set to avoid multiple proceedings, the system as it stands now is unavoidable.


  1. Binctin N (2016) Le renouveau du contentieux international de la propriété intellectuelle. JDI 381Google Scholar
  2. International Chamber of Commerce (2014) Effective Management of Arbitration – A Guide for In-House Counsel and Other Party Representative.
  3. Kessedjian C (2014) International arbitration – more efficiency for greater credibility. Fordham Arbitration Series, BrillGoogle Scholar
  4. Kessedjian C (2015) L’arbitre, ‘juge naturel’ du commerce international. In: Cecchi-Dimeglio P, Brenneur B (dir) Manuel interdisciplinaire des modes alternatifs de résolution des conflits. Larcier, pp 985–996Google Scholar
  5. Mazeaud V (2016) La (clause de) conciliation à tout prix. Quiproquo sur l’admission des clauses sur le principe de la conciliation, DallozGoogle Scholar
  6. Moura Vicente D (2016) Towards a universal justice? Putting international courts and jurisdictions into perspective. Brill/NijhoffGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer international Pubishing Switzerland AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University Panthéon-Assas Paris IIParisFrance

Personalised recommendations