Abstract
In recent decades, there have been calls to open university research and learning through transdisciplinarity. The inference here is that the increased specialisation of disciplines has created isolation, division, exclusion, separation and fixity within research and learning. This chapter explores the potential for openness in university research and learning through a discussion of the relationality of transdisciplinarity and disciplinarity. An examination of this relationality is valuable, given that transdisciplinarity and disciplinarity are intimately connected and co-dependent. This relationality is explored through two concepts that we argue constitute its potential to create openness in university research and learning: pliability and transversality. This chapter argues that disciplines, be they science, planning, law, health or religion, manage to be both open to change, constantly becoming-other, and universal, abstract, and eternal. Whilst this pliability of disciplinarity is often translated as disciplinary inadequacy, we argue that this pliability is a valuable component of disciplinarity, and that it provides the site for the transversality of transdisciplinarity. We explore these concepts through reference to a recent problematization of disciplinary research and learning at the human and environment nexus, which has given rise to the notion of planetary health, and its call for a substantial and urgent opening of research and learning to understand and address emerging geo-social assemblages such as the Anthropocene.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See Deleuze (2006), where the fold (“le pli”), rather than the point or the line, is the main unit of becoming. The fold encapsulates difference in unity, but a fragmented unity that keeps on becoming, indeed folding and unfolding. This is also our idea of pliability, as the flexibility of adaptation yet the consistency of constancy.
References
Alley, R. (2000). The two-mile time machine: Ice cores, abrupt climate change, and our future. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Appadurai, A. (1996). Diversity and disciplinarity as cultural artifacts. In C. Nelson & D. Gaonkar (Eds.), Disciplinarity and dissent in cultural studies (pp. 23–36). New York: Routledge.
Atran, S., & Henrich, J. (2010). The evolution of religion: How cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religion. Biological Theory, 5, 18–30.
Barrett, J. (2007). Cognitive science of religion: What is it and why is it? Religion Compass, 1(6), 768–786.
Boyden, S. V. (2004). The biology of civilisation: Understanding human culture as a force in nature. Sydney: UNSW Press.
Broecker, W. (1987). Unpleasant surprises in the greenhouse. Nature, 328, 123–126.
Brooke, J. (2014). Climate change and the course of global history: A rough journey. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Burdon, P. (2010). The rights of nature: Reconsidered. Australian Humanities Review, 49, 1.
Burdon, P. (2012). A theory of earth jurisprudence. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 37, 28–60.
Butler, C., Dixon, J., & Capon, A. (Eds.). (2015). Health of people, places and planet. Reflections based on Tony McMichael’s four decades of contribution to epidemiological understanding. Canberra: ANU Press.
Canguilhem, G. (1943). The normal and the pathological (C. R. Fawcett & R. S. Cohen, 1991, Trans.). New York: Zone Books.
Capon, A. (2017). Harnessing urbanisation for human wellbeing and planetary health. Journal of Planetary Health, 1(1), e6–e7.
Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Chughtai, S., & Blanchet, K. (2017). Systems thinking in public health: A bibliographic contribution to a meta-narrative review. Health Policy and Planning, 32, 585–594.
Cilliers, P., & Nicolescu, B. (2012). Complexity and transdisciplinarity – Discontinuity, levels of reality and the hidden third. Futures, 44(8), 711–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.04.001.
Clark, H. (2015). Governance for planetary health and sustainable development. The Lancet, 386(10007), e39–e41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61205-3.
Cusack, C. M. (2010). The church of all worlds and pagan ecotheology: Uncertain boundaries and unlimited possibilities. Diskus 11. At: http://jbasr.com/basr/diskus/diskus10/index.html.
DeFries, R. S., Ellis, E. C., Chapin, F. S., Matson, P. A., Turner, B. L., Agrawal, A., et al. (2012). Planetary opportunities: A social contract for global change science to contribute to a sustainable future. Bioscience, 62(6), 603–606. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.6.11.
Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations, 1972–1990. New York: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G. (2006). The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (Rev. ed.). London/New York: Continuum.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Demaio, A. R., & Rockström, J. (2015). Human and planetary health: Towards a common language. The Lancet, 386(10007), e36–e37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61044-3.
DeRoover, J. (2014). Incurably religious? Consensus gentium and the cultural universality of religion. Numen, 61, 5–32.
Després, C., Vachon, G., & Fortin, A. (2011). Implementing transdisciplinarity: Architecture and urban planning at work. Dordrecht: Springer.
Enengel, B., Muhar, A., Penker, M., Freyer, B., Drlik, S., & Ritter, F. (2012). Co-production of knowledge in transdisciplinary doctoral theses on landscape development – An analysis of actor roles and knowledge types in different research phases. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(1–2), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.004.
Fam, D., Kelly, S., Leimbach, T., Hitchens, L., & Callen, M. (2018). Meta-considerations for planning, introducing and Standardising collective learning in higher degree institutions. In D. Fam, L. Neuhauser, & P. Gibbs (Eds.), The art of collaborative research and collective learning: Transdisciplinary research, practice and education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Foucault, M. (1973). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punish. The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans. Vintage Books ed.). New York: Random House Inc.
Foucault, M. (1991). Space, knowledge and power. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader: An introduction to Foucault’s thought (pp. 239–256). New York: Penguin Group.
Francis (Pope). (2015). Laudato Si’: On care for our common home. Rome: The Holy See.
Gordon, S. (1990). Holistic medicine and mental health practice: Toward a new synthesis. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 60, 357–371.
Guattari, F., Osborne, P., Sandford, S., & Alliez, É. (2015). Transdisciplinarity must become transversality. Theory, Culture & Society, 32(5–6), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415597045.
Haines, A., Whitmee, S., & Horton, R. (2015). Planetary health: A call for papers. The Lancet, 384(9942), 479–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61289-7.
Hawkins, K. (1984). Environment and enforcement: Regulation and the social definition of pollution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Horton, R. (2015a). Offline: Progress towards planetary health. The Lancet, 385(9965), 314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60093-9.
Horton, R. (2015b). Offline: Why the unity of life matters for our planetary health. The Lancet, 386(9991), 323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61291-0.
Horton, R. (2016). Offline: Planetary health – Where next? The Lancet, 387(10028), 1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30196-9.
Horton, R., & Lo, S. (2015). Planetary health: A new science for exceptional action. The Lancet, 386(10007), 1921–1922. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61038-8.
Horton, R., Beaglehole, R., Bonita, R., Raeburn, J., McKee, M., & Wall, S. (2014). From public to planetary health: A manifesto. The Lancet, 383(9920), 847. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60409-8.
Kahn, L. H., Kaplan, B., Monath, T., Woodall, J., & Conti, L. (2014). A manifesto for planetary health. The Lancet, 383(9927), 1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60709-1.
Kelley, D. (Ed.). (1997). History and the disciplines: The reclassification of knowledge in early modern Europe. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
Kirsten, T., Van der Walt, H., & Viljoen, C. (2009). Health, well-being and wellness: An anthropological eco-systemic approach. Health SA Gesondheid, 14, 149–155.
Lang, T., & Rayner, G. (2012). Ecological public health: The 21st century’s big idea? An essay by Tim Lang and Geof Rayner. British Medical Journal, 345, 1–5.
Latour, B. (2010). The making of law: An ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Cambridge/Malden: Polity.
Loubser, G. (2015). Becoming transdisciplinary theologians: Wentzel van Huyssteen, Paul Cilliers and Constantine Stanislavski. Theological Studies, 71(3), 1–9.
Luhmann, N., Ziegert, K. A., & Kastner, F. (2008). Law as a social system. New York: Oxford University Press.
Martin, E., & Beatley, T. (1993). Our relationship with the earth: Environmental ethics in planning education. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 12(2), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x9301200207.
McLaren, L., & Hawe, P. (2005). Ecological perspectives in health research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.018044.
McLeroy, L., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15(4), 351–377.
McMichael, A. J. (1993). Planetary overload: Global environmental change and the health of the human species. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Messer-Davidow, E., Shumway, D., & Sylvan, D. (Eds.). (1993). Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of transdisciplinarity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Norenzayan, A., Sharriff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016). The cultural evolution of prosocial religion. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 39, 1–19.
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (2012). Mapping the lawscape: Spatial law and the body. In Z. Bankowski, M. Del Mar, & P. Maharg (Eds.), Beyond text in legal education. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (2013). Atmospheres of law: Senses, affects, lawscapes. Emotion, Space and Society, 7, 35–44.
Porter, R. (1997). The greatest benefit to mankind. A medical history of humanity from antiquity to the present. London: Harper Collins.
Ravetz, J. (2008). Gaia’s revenge: Climate change and humanity’s loss. Futures, 40(3), 305–307.
Rizzo, A., & Galanakis, M. (2015). Transdisciplinary urbanism: Three experiences from Europe and Canada. Cities, 47, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.01.001.
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J., Folkes, C., & Walker, B. (2001). Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature, 413, 591–596.
Smith, H., & Jenkins, P. (2015). Trans-disciplinary research and strategic urban expansion planning in a context of weak institutional capacity: Case study of Huambo, Angola. Habitat International, 46, 244–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.006.
Taylor, B. (2010). Dark green religion: Nature spirituality and the planetary future. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.
The Lancet. (2009). What is health? The ability to adapt. Lancet, 373, 781.
Valenza, R. (2009). Literature, language, and the rise of the intellectual disciples in Britain (pp. 1680–1820). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Huyssteen, J. (1999). The shaping of rationality: Toward interdisciplinarity in theology and science. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Van Huyssteen, J. (2006). Alone in the world? Human uniqueness in science and theology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Van Huyssteen, J. (2014). Postfoundationalism in theology: The structure of theological solutions. Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses, 90(2), 209–229.
Wade, D. T., & Halligan, P. W. (2004). Do biomedical models of illness make for good healthcare systems? British Medical Journal, 329, 1398–1401.
White, L. (1967). The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis. Science, 155, 1203.
Whitmee, S., Haines, A., Beyrer, C., Boltz, F., Capon, A. G., de Souza Dias, B. F., & Yach, D. (2015). Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: Report of the Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health. The Lancet, 386(10007), 1973–2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60901-1.
Zalasiewicz, J., Steffen, W., Leinfelder, R., Williams, M., & Waters, C. (2017). Petrifying earth process: The stratigraphic imprint of key earth system parameters in the Anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(2–3), 83–104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prior, J., Cusack, C.M., Capon, A. (2018). The Role of Pliability and Transversality Within Trans/Disciplinarity: Opening University Research and Learning to Planetary Health. In: Fam, D., Neuhauser, L., Gibbs, P. (eds) Transdisciplinary Theory, Practice and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93743-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93743-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93742-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93743-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)