Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning in Transdisciplinary Collaborations: A Conceptual Vocabulary

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transdisciplinary Theory, Practice and Education

Abstract

This chapter presents a conceptual vocabulary for learning in transdisciplinary collaborations based on literature review. After discussing preliminary distinctions between interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity, the chapter provides insights on the nature of integrative learning in interdisciplinary education, grounded in a shift from content-based to process-based integration, the theory of constructivism, and the concept of reflective equilibrium. It then defines transdisciplinary learning framed by the thematics of complexity and systems thinking and the concept of co-construction of knowledge as well as mutual, generative, deep, double-loop and triple-loop learning. The vocabulary expands when looking beyond the notion of collaborative learning in education to concepts of collective learning in the field of health and transdisciplinary orientation in the field of team science. The conclusion reflects on the shift from adaptive and generative learning to reflexivity, transformational learning, convergence, transactivity, and relational thinking. In aggregate, the concepts that shape this vocabulary underscore the pivotal relationship between communication and learning. Members of transdisciplinary research teams gain collective communication competence through joint activities, anchored by socio-cognitive platforms for interdisciplinary collaboration that are crucial to building a cooperation and communication culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This section on Integrative learning in Interdisciplinary Education draws on Klein (2005).

References

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Boston: Addison-Wesley/Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augsburg, T. (2014). Becoming transdisciplinary: The emergence of the transdisciplinary individual. World Futures: The Journal of New Paradigm Research, 70(3–4), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. J. (2015). Collaboration in collaborative learning. Interaction Studies, 16(3), 451–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedwell, W., Wildman, J., DiazGranados, D., Salazar, M., et al. (2012). Collaboration at work: An integrative multilevel conceptualization. Human Resource Management Review, 22, 128–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellotti, B. (2017). Transdisciplinarity as an emergent property in an agricultural research-for-development project on the East India Plateau. In D. Fam, D. Riedy, & E. C. Mitchell (Eds.), Transdisciplinary research and practice for sustainability (pp. 221–235). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, M., Jahn, T., Knobloch, T., Krohn, W., Pohl, C., & Schramm, E. (2011). Methoden transdisziplinärer forschung: Ein uberblick mit anwendungsbeispielen. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag; English translation Transdisciplinary research methods (2012). Frankfurt/Main/Chicago: Campus Verlag/University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boix-Mansilla, V. (2017). Interdisciplinary learning: A cognitive-epistemological foundation. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & R. Pacheco (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 261–275). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boix-Mansilla, V., & Lenoir, Y. (2010). Interdisciplinarity in U.S. schools: Past, present, and future. Issues in Integrative Studies, 28, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boix-Mansilla, V., Lamont, M., & Sato, K. (2015). Shared cognitive-emotional interactional platforms: Markers and conditions for successful interdisciplinary collaborations. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 41(4), 571–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, A., Lyall, C., Tait, J., & Williams, R. (2004). Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: The case of the Fifth Framework Programme. Futures, 36(4), 457–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccorio, R. A. (1970). Integration in the curriculum: An historical and semantic inquiry. Main Currents, 27, 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, N., Handlovsky, I., & Sinclair, D. (2015). Using reflexivity to achieve transdisciplinarity in nursing and social work. In N. Greaves & B. E. Poole (Eds.), Transforming additions: Gender, trauma, transdisciplinarity (pp. 120–136). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., & Van den Bosschec, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organizations. Educational Research Review, 5, 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fam, D. (2017). Unpublished MS. Methods and practices to build and strengthen transdisciplinary competencies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, T. (2011). Getting over architecture: Thinking, surmounting, and redirecting. In I. Doucet & N. Janssens (Eds.), Transdisciplinary knowledge production in architecture and urbanism (pp. 24–27). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehlert, S., & Browne, T. (2013). Transdisciplinary training and education. In D. Haire-Joshu & T. McBridge (Eds.), Transdisciplinary public health: Research, education, and practice (pp. 31–51). San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, P. (2015). Transdisciplinary professional learning and practice. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, P. (2017). Transdisciplinary higher education: A theoretical basis revealed in practice. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, B., Haas, P., & Moore, M. (1983). An interdisciplinary model to implement general education. Journal of Higher Education, 54(1), 42–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, R., Bergmann, M., & Keil, F. (2012). Transdisciplinarity, between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecological Economics, 79, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, H., & Chi, M. (2011). Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning. Instructional Service, 35, 287–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (2005). Integrative learning and interdisciplinary studies. Peer Review, 7(4), 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (2017a). Transdisciplinarity and sustainability: Patterns of definition. In D. Fam, C. Riedy, & C. Mitchell (Eds.), Transdisciplinary research and practice for sustainable outcomes (pp. 7–21). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (2017b). Typologies of interdisciplinarity: The boundary work of definition. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & R. Pachecho (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 21–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, R. (2014). Creativity and organizational learning as means to foster sustainability. Sustainable Development, 22, 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, S. L. T. (2017). Transdisciplinary pedagogy in higher education: Transdisciplinary learning, learning cycles, and habits of mind. In P. Gibbs (Ed.), Transdisciplinary higher education: A theoretical basis revealed in practice (pp. 3–16). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, A. (2013). Reframing interdisciplinary and interprofessional collaboration through the lens of collective and sociomaterial theories of learning. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 31, 75–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformation Education, 1, 58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra, S., Stokols, D., & Cheng, L. (2015). The transdisciplinary orientation scale: Factor structure and relation to the integrative quality and scope of scientific publications. Journal of Translational Medicine and Epidemiology, 3(2), 1042+.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C., Cordell, D., & Fam, D. (2015). Beginning at the end: The outcome spaces framework to guide purposive transdisciplinary research. Futures, 65, 6–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C., Cordell, D., & Fam, D. (2017). Beginning at the end: The outcome spaces framework to guide purposive transdisciplinary research. In D. Fam, C. Riedy, & C. Mitchell (Eds.), Transdisciplinary research and practice for sustainability (pp. 25–38). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council, Hilton, M., & Cooke, N. (2015). Enhancing the effecctiveness of team science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. L. (2009). Building collective communication competence in interdisciplinary research teams. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(3), 278–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosey, P., Visser, M., & Saunders, N. K. (2011). The origins and conceptualizations of “triple-loop” learning: A critical review. Management Learning, 43(3), 289–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vegt, G. S., Bunderson, S., & Kuipers, B. (2010). Why turnover matters in self-managing work teams: Learning, social integration, and task flexibility. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1168–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanasupa, L., Schlemer, B. R., Brogno, C., Hendrix, G., & MacDougall, N. (2014). Laying the foundation for transdisciplinary faculty collaborations: Actions for a sustainable future. Sustainability, 6, 2893–2928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volet, S., Vaurus, M., & Salonen, P. (2009). Self- and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction, 17, 416–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

    Julie Thompson Klein

Authors
  1. Julie Thompson Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Thompson Klein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia

    Dena Fam

  2. School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Linda Neuhauser

  3. Centre for Education Research and Scholarship, School of Health and Education, Middlesex University, London, UK

    Paul Gibbs

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Klein, J.T. (2018). Learning in Transdisciplinary Collaborations: A Conceptual Vocabulary. In: Fam, D., Neuhauser, L., Gibbs, P. (eds) Transdisciplinary Theory, Practice and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93743-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93743-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93742-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93743-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation