Abstract
In this short final chapter I seek several interrelated things and, in doing so, turn to an ancient philosophy for inspiration. I have chosen Aristotle (All quotations from Aristotelian works are taken for his Collective Works, edited by J. Barnes, and references are made using Bekker numbers and abbreviations of the books. These are: EN – Nicomachean Ethics; Met – Metaphysics; Phy – Physic; and Top –Topics.), notwithstanding his views on gender, human rights and democracy, to re-examine his influence on the development of disciplines and the limitations that these powerful structures exert on current transdisciplinary collaborative thinking. I look at his work again and suggest that he was a transdisciplinary thinker who embraces many forms of knowledge and meaning-making, and who accepts the social constructivism of truth and how it might be used. Above all, he locates knowledge alongside collaborative communities of the polis, in the situated-ness of the community with a purpose of action. My second reason for selecting Aristotle is that I find resonance with much of what he says in the chapters of this volume. So, this chapter is an effort to use Aristotle as the weft threads for a transdisciplinary pattern of knowledge, and to weave its promotion by using the contributions of this volume’s authors as the warp. I hope that I have not mispresented these excellent contributions, for I have not attempted to summarize their work, but only to pluck the themes that echo my prejudice.
All men [people] by nature desire to know
Met 980b22 – opening line of the Aristotle’s Metaphysics
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Here, I am drawn to consider the five socially constructed and nested knowledges proposed by Brown in Chap. 18.
References
Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity theory. London: Taylor & Francis.
Bruffee, K. A. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dehart, S. M. (1995). The convergence of praxis and theoria in Aristotle. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33(1), 7–27.
Dunne, J. (1993). Back to rough ground – ‘Phronesis’ and ‘techne’ in modern philosophy and in Aristotle. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Eikeland, O. (2007). From epistemology to gnoseology – Understanding the knowledge claims of action research. Management Research News, 30(5), 344–358.
Eikeland, O. (2008). The ways of Aristotle: Aristotelian phronesis, Aristotelian philosophy of dialogue, and action research. Bern: Peter Lang.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter – Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foucault, N. (2010). The government of self and others. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gadamer, H. G. (1975). Truth and Method. New York: Seabury.
Johnson, M. R. (2015). Aristotle’s architectonic sciences. In D. Ebrey (Ed.), Theory and practice in Aristotle’s natural philosophy (pp. 163–186). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oakeshott, M. (1975/2003). On human conduct. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Papastephanou, M. (2010). Aristotle, the action researcher. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 44(4), 589–597.
Papastephanou, M. (2013). Aristotelian gnoseology and work-based learning. In P. Gibbs (Ed.), Learning, work and practice: New understanding (pp. 107–120). Dordrecht: Springer.
Peters, M. (2003). Truth-telling as an educational practice of the self: Foucault, parreshia and the ethics of subjectivity. Oxford Review of Education, 29, 207–223.
Pickup, A. (2016). Critical inquiry as virtuous truth-telling: Implications of Phronesis and Parrhesia. Critical Questions in Education (Special Issue), 7(3), 177–196.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (2004). Practice and the human sciences – The case for a judgment-based practice of care. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Surprenant, C. W. (2012). Politics and practical wisdom: Rethinking Aristotle’s account of phronesis. Topoi, 31, 221–227.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gibbs, P. (2018). Philosophical Reflections: A Coda. In: Fam, D., Neuhauser, L., Gibbs, P. (eds) Transdisciplinary Theory, Practice and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93743-4_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93743-4_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93742-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93743-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)