Skip to main content

Comparison of E-Ink and OLED Screens as Train Seat Displays: A User Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Transport Systems – From Research and Development to the Market Uptake (INTSYS 2017)

Abstract

This study was designed to provide an evaluation of two types of train seat displays (OLED and E-ink), from a user-centred perspective. Numerous factors influence the decisions on which display to use, such as costs or energy use. It is also important to consider human factors aspects like readability and user preferences. To provide some real-world insights into these issues we designed a pilot study to compare both displays. Participants were asked to give their impressions and respond to questions during a semi-structured interview process, when they were presented with both displays. Results show that participants favour the OLED display overall as it is easily noticeable in different light conditions. However, some aspects of the E-ink are preferred: it is easier to read and understand. We conclude that research with real users is extremely important when designing and defining hardware to be used during the implementation of intelligent transport systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fox, C., Oliveira, L., Kirkwood, L., Cain, R.: Understanding users’ behaviours in relation to concentrated boarding: implications for rail infrastructure and technology. In: 15th International Conference on Manufacturing Research-ICMR. IOS Press, Greenwich (2017). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-792-4-120

  2. Oliveira, L., Bradley, C., Birrell, S., Davies, A., Tinworth, N., Cain, R.: Understanding passengers’ experiences of train journeys to inform the design of technological innovations. In: Re: Research-The 2017 International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR) Conference, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, pp. 838–853 (2017). https://doi.org/10.7945/C2R388

  3. Miñano, S.P., Kirkwood, L., Court, S., Farnsworth, M., Shehab, E., Tinworth, N.: A review of digital wayfinding technologies in the transportation industry. In: 15th International Conference on Manufacturing Research-ICMR. IOS Press, Greenwich (2017). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-792-4-207

  4. Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., Preece, J.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human Computer Interaction, vol. 2. Wiley, England (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goodman, E., Kuniavsky, M., Moed, A.: Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner’s Guide to User Research, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Siegenthaler, E., Wurtz, P., Bergamin, P., Groner, R.: Comparing reading processes on e-ink displays and print. Displays 32, 268–273 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2011.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harb, A.: Energy harvesting: State-of-the-art. Renew. Energy 36, 2641–2654 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Siegenthaler, E., Schmid, L., Wyss, M., Wurtz, P.: LCD vs. E-ink: an analysis of the reading behavior. J. Eye Mov. Res. 5, 1–7 (2012). https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.5.3.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Robson, C.: Real World Research: A Resource For Users of Social Research Methods in Applied Settings, 3rd edn. Wiley, UK (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oliveira, L., Bradley, C., Birrell, S., Tinworth, N., Davies, A., Cain, R.: Using passenger personas to design technological innovation for the rail industry. In: Kováčiková, T., et al. (eds.) INTSYS 2017. LNICST, vol. 222, pp. 65–75. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is part of the “CLoSeR: Customer Loyalty and Dynamic Seat Reservation System” project, funded by RSSB/Innovate UK (Grant No 102483). This project was selected through the competition ‘Enhancing Customer Experience in Rail’. Partners in this project are the University of Warwick, Cranfield University and four industry partners: Unipart Rail, TrainFX, Loyalty Prime and Great Western Railway. The authors would like to thank all participants who donated their time to take part in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Oliveira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Babu, V.S., Oliveira, L., Birrell, S., Taylor, A., Cain, R. (2018). Comparison of E-Ink and OLED Screens as Train Seat Displays: A User Study. In: Kováčiková, T., Buzna, Ľ., Pourhashem, G., Lugano, G., Cornet, Y., Lugano, N. (eds) Intelligent Transport Systems – From Research and Development to the Market Uptake. INTSYS 2017. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 222. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93710-6_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93710-6_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93709-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93710-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics