Skip to main content

Haptic Alternatives for Mobile Device Authentication by Older Technology Users

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Information and Communication Technology 2018 (IC2IT 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 769))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Turing tests are used to secure the human interaction on the Internet. Tests such as CAPTCHA are based on visual or auditory recognition of symbols and are difficult to distinguish by elderly people. A study examining the consistency of a tactile feedback-based Turing test identified an alternative to mainstream tests. This approach examines the vibration-based sensitivity which is detectable through skin surfaces when used to touch the screen of a mobile device. The study concentrated on a range of rough, smooth, sticky and coarse textures as possible differentiators for swipe-based tactile authentication using mobile devices. This study examined the vibration-based touch screen capabilities of 30 elderly people over the age of 65. The results of this study showed that tactile differentiation can be a viable alternative for device and security authentication for Turing tests such as those used for CAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA verification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Padave, K.: The Evolution of CAPTCHA – How an Anti-Spam Measure Has Grown? EXEIdeas – Let’s Your Mind Rock (2014). http://www.exeideas.com/2014/11/the-evolution-ofCAPTCHA.html. Accessed 4 Aug 2017

  2. Gafni, R., Nagar, I.: CAPTCHA: Impact on user experience of users with learning disabilities. Interdiscip. J. e-Skills Life Long Learn. 12, 207–223 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pope, C., Kushpreet, K.: Is it human or computer? Defending e-commerce with CAPTCHAs. IT Prof. 7(2), 43–49 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baecher, P., Fischlin, M., Gordon, L., Langenberg, R., Lutzow, M., Schroder, D.: CAPTCHAs: the good, the bad and the ugly. In: Frieling, F.C. (ed.) Sicherheit. (2010). LNI, vol. 170, pp. 353–365. GI (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Divyashree, N., Kumar, S.T.: A survey on CAPTCHA categories. Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci. 5(5), 16458–16462 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shull, P.B., Damian, D.D.: Haptic wearables as sensory replacement, sensory augmentation and trainer – a review. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 12, 1–13 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook, D.M., Kumar, A., Satiah: C.U.: Loyalty cards and the problem of CAPTCHA: 2nd tier security and usability issues for senior citizens. In: 13th Australian Information Security Management Conference, pp. 101–111. SRI Security Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moy, G., Jones, N., Harkless, C., Potter, R.: Distortion estimation techniques in solving visual CAPTCHAs. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 23–28. IEEE, Washington, D.C. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. TCP: The CAPTCHA Project, Gimpy Dictionary. http://www.captcha.net/captchas/gimpy

  10. Mori, G., Malik, J.: Results on Gimpy (2002). https://www.cs.sfu.ca/~mori/research/gimpy/hard/

  11. Merriman, J.: Human or Computer? Take This Test. The New York Times. https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Research/Projects/CS/vision/mori-nyt/page2.html

  12. Aboufadel, E., Olsen, J., Windle, J.: Breaking the Holiday Inn priority club CAPTCHA. Coll. Math. J. 36(2), 101–108 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yan J., El Ahmad, A.: A low-cost attack on a Microsoft CAPTCHA. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 543–554. ACM Press, Virginia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. GITS: Gujarat Institute of Technical Studies CAPTCHA. http://gitsgtu.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/table-of-contents-acknowledgments.html

  15. Kaur, K., Behal, S.: CAPTCHA and its techniques: a review. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 5(5), 6341–6344 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yilmaz, S., Zavrak, S., Bodur, H.: Distinguishing humans from automated programs by a novel audio-based CAPTCHA. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 132(13), 18–22 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Choudhary, S., Saroha, R., Dahiya, Y., Choudhary, S.: Understanding CAPTCHA: text and audio based CAPTCHA with its applications. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. 3(6), 106–115 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, S.F., Lin, P.Y., Wang, M.H.: The effects of the transparency of the guiding diagrams on the phone interface for the elderly. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Applications, Services and Contexts, ITAP 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10298. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hsu, C.H., Lee, Y.L.: Effects of age groups and distortion types on text-based CAPTCHA tasks. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction. Users and Applications, HCI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6764. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roshanbin, N., Miller, J.: ADAMAS: Interweaving unicode and color to enhance CAPTCHA security. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 55, 289–310 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen, D.V.: Contributions to text-based CAPTCHA security. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wollongong database (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Beheshti, S., Liatsis, P.: CAPTCHA usability and performance, how to measure the usability level of human interactive applications quantitatively and qualitatively? In: 2015 International Conference on Developments of E-Systems Engineering (DeSE), pp. 131–136. IEEE, Duai (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen, V., Chow, Y., Susilo, W.: A CAPTCHA scheme based on the identification of character locations. In: Huang, X., Zhou, J. (eds.) Information Security Practice and Experience, ISPEC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8434, pp. 60–74. Springer, Cham (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Earl, C.: Can CAPTCHAs Be Made Accessible. https://www.afb.org/blog/afb-blog/can-captchas-be-made-accessible/12

  25. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Australia’s Welfare 2015: Growing Older. http://www.aihw.gov.au/australias-welfare/2015/growing-older

  26. Australian Bureau of Statistics: Disability, Ageing and Carers, Australia: First Results, Canberra (2015). http://www.abs.gov.au

  27. Telarus: What can google-eyed robots and CAPTCHAs tell us about cybersecurity? https://www.telarus.com.au/news/month/feb/can-googly-eyed-robots-captchas-tell-us-cybersecurity

  28. Nigam, Y., Knight, J., Bhattacharya, S., Bayer, A.: Physiological changes associated with ageing and immobility. J. Ageing Res. 2012, 1–2 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. NIH, National Institute of Health: Hearing, ear infections, and Deafness: Age related hearing Loss. NIH Pub. No. 97-4235. https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/age-related-hearing-loss

  30. Kozarsky, A.: Eye problems: what to expect as you age. http://www.webmd.com/eye-health/vision-problems-ageing-adults#1

  31. Howieson, B.D.: Cognitive skills and the Ageing Brain: What to Expect. The Dana Foundation (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Martin, J.A., Ramsay, J., Hughes, C., Peters, D.M., Edwards, M.G.: Age and grip strength predict hand dexterity in adults. PLoS ONE 10(2), e0117598 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Milanovic, Z., Jorgić, B., Trajković, N., Sporis, G., Pantelić, S., James, N.: Age-related decrease in physical activity and functional fitness among elderly men and women. Clin. Interv. Aging 8, 549–556 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. AIHW, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Ageing and the health system: challenges, opportunities and adaptations. Australia’s Health Series no. 14 Cat no. Aus. 178. AIHW, Canberra (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Neustatl, G.: Accessibility for All: Business Benefits. Blog accessibility and assistive technology. https://www.visionaustralia.org/business-and-professionals/digital-access-consulting/resources/blog---accessibility-and-assistive-technology-blog/blog

  36. Jones, R.: Mobile banking on the rise as payment via apps soars by 54% in 2015. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jul/22/mobile-banking-on-the-rise-as-payment-via-apps-soars-by-54-in-2015

  37. Haxton, N.: Internet banking proving difficult for some elderly and disabled people. ABC News. http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2014/s4149952.htm

  38. Rouse, M.: Multifactor Authentication (MFA). TechTarget. http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/multifactor-authentication-MFA

  39. Ihalainen, P.: What is Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)? GlobalSign Blog. https://www.globalsign.com/en/blog/what-is-multi-factor-authentication-mfa

  40. Barbir, A.: Multi-factor Authentication Methods Taxonomy. Presentation, Oasis (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Al-Mukhtar, M.M.A., Al-Taie, R.R.K.: A more robust text based CAPTCHA for security in web applications. Int. J. Emerg. Trends Technol. Comput. Sci. (IJETTCS) 3(2), 7–12 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tan, H.Z., Gray, R., Young, J.J., Taylor, R.: A haptic back display for attentional and directional cueing. Haptics-e Electron. J. Haptics Res. 3(1), 1–20 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bau, O., Poupyrev, I., Israr, A., Harrison, C.: TeslaTouch: electrovibration for touch surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 283–292. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lylykangas, J., Surakka, V., Salminen, K., Raisamo, J., Laitinen, P., Rönning, K., Raisamo, R.: Designing tactile feedback for piezo buttons. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 3281–3284 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chew, M., Tygar, D.J.: Image recognition CAPTCHAs. In: Zhang, K., Zheng, Y. (eds.) Information Security, ISC 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3225, pp. 268–279. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bianchi, A., Oakley, I., Kwon, D.S.: The secure haptic keypad: a tactile password system. In: Proceedings of the 10th SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1089–1092. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Cook .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kaur, K., Cook, D.M. (2019). Haptic Alternatives for Mobile Device Authentication by Older Technology Users. In: Unger, H., Sodsee, S., Meesad, P. (eds) Recent Advances in Information and Communication Technology 2018. IC2IT 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 769. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93692-5_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics