Skip to main content

Enhanced Manhattan-Based Clustering Using Fuzzy C-Means Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Information and Communication Technology 2018 (IC2IT 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 769))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Fuzzy C-Means is a clustering algorithm known to suffer from slow processing time. One factor affecting this algorithm is on the selection of appropriate distance measure. While this drawback was addressed with the use of the Manhattan distance measure, this sacrifice its accuracy over processing time. In this study, a new approach to distance measurement is explored to answer both the speed and accuracy issues of Fuzzy C-Means incorporating trigonometric functions to Manhattan distance calculation. Upon application of the new approach for clustering of the Iris dataset, processing time was reduced by three iterations over the use of Euclidean distance. Improvement in accuracy was also observed with 50% and 78% improvement over the use of Euclidean and Manhattan distances respectively. The results provide clear proof that the new distance measurement approach was able to address both the slow processing time and accuracy problems associated with Fuzzy C-Means clustering algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chen, H., Storey, V.C.: Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Q. 36(4), 1165–1188 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jung, Y.G., Kang, M.S., Heo, J.: Clustering performance comparison using K-Means and expectation maximization algorithms. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 28(sub1), 44–48 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Raval, U.R., Jani, C.: Implementing and improvisation of K-Means clustering. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput. 4(11), 72–76 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Han, D., Ji, J., Dai, Y., Li, G., Fan, W., Chen, H.: Improved Fuzzy C-Means algorithm and its application to classification of remote sensing image in Chengdu City. In: 2016 International Conference on Progress in Informatics and Computing (PIC), pp. 437–443. IEEE, Shanghai (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cebeci, Z., Yildiz, F.: Comparison of K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means algorithms on different cluster structures. J. Agric. Inf. 6(3), 13–23 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Winkler, R., Klawonn, F., Kruse, R.: Problems of Fuzzy C-Means clustering and similar algorithms with high dimensional data sets. In: Gaul, W., Geyer-Schulz, A., Schmidt-Thieme, L., Kunze, J. (eds.) Challenges at the Interface of Data Analysis, Computer Science, and Optimization. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization, pp. 1–8. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Fahad, A., et al.: A survey of clustering algorithms for big data : taxonomy & empirical analysis. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Topics Comput. 2(3), 267–279 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharma, S.K., Kumar, S.: Comparative analysis of Manhattan and Euclidean distance metrics using A* algorithm. J. Res. Eng. Appl. Sci. 1(4), 196–198 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kalaivani, E.R., Suganya, G., Kiruba, J.: Review on K-Means and fuzzy C means clustering algorithm. Imp. J. Interdiscip. Res. 3(2), 1822–1824 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kouser, K.: A comparative study of K means algorithm by different distance measures. Int. J. Innov. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 1(9), 2443–2447 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kapoor, A.: A comparative study of K-Means, K-Means ++ and Fuzzy C-Means clustering algorithms. In: 3rd International Conference on Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology (CICT), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Son, L.H.: Generalized picture distance measure and applications to picture fuzzy clustering. Appl. Soft Comput. J. 46(C), 284–295 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aggarwal, C.C., Hinneburg, A., Keim, D.A.: On the surprising behavior of distance metrics in high dimensional space. In: Van den Bussche, J., Vianu, V. (eds.) ICDT 2001. LNCS, vol. 1973, pp. 420–434. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44503-X_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Rathod, A.B.: A comparative study on distance measuring approaches for permutation representations. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advances in Electronics, Communication and Computer Technology (ICAECCT), pp. 251–255 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, X., Yu, F., Pedrycz, W.: An area-based shape distance measure of time series. Appl. Soft Comput. J. 46(C), 650–659 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, Z., Zhao, N., Wang, W., Tang, R., Li, S.: A fault diagnosis approach for gas turbine exhaust gas temperature based on Fuzzy C-Means clustering and support vector machine. Math. Prob. Eng. 2015, 1–11 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grover, N.: A study of various fuzzy clustering algorithms. Int. J. Eng. Res. 5013(3), 177–181 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leddo, J.: Comparing the relative effects of homework on high aptitude VS average aptitude students 2(9), 59–62 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dom, B.E., Jose, S.: An information-theoretic external cluster-validity measure. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2002), pp. 137–145, Alberta, Canada (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Färber, I., et al.: On using class-labels in evaluation of clusterings. In: Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on Discovering, Summarizing and Using Multiple Clusterings (MultiClust 2010) Held in Conjunction with 16th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2010), p. 9. Washington, D.C., USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study would not be possible without the financial support of the Commission on Higher Education Kto12 Transition Program Unit Quezon City, Philippines and Tarlac Agricultural University Tarlac, Philippines.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joven A. Tolentino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tolentino, J.A., Gerardo, B.D., Medina, R.P. (2019). Enhanced Manhattan-Based Clustering Using Fuzzy C-Means Algorithm. In: Unger, H., Sodsee, S., Meesad, P. (eds) Recent Advances in Information and Communication Technology 2018. IC2IT 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 769. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93692-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics