Skip to main content

Evolutionary Neurology and the Human Soul

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
From Aristotle to Cognitive Neuroscience
  • 377 Accesses

Abstract

A nervous system configured by intersubjectivity and a grasp of the distinction between truth and falsity shape our neural function so that we sense, perceive, cognise, and act in ways that elaborate sensori-motor activity to fit us for cognitive function under norms of truth and falsity conveyed by and linked to speech or “propositionising.” The resulting self-formation fits us for a world in which meaningful symbolism and normatively constrained communication imposes truth and falsity and depth as the basis of a well-organised intellect. Thus our sensori-motor and language-related neural functions are fitted for the joint demands of the natural world and the socio-political (or discursive) world through triply responsive neurocognitive assemblies shaped in human cognitive development and underpinning human consciousness, thought, and action.

“Is there any other point to which you would wish to draw my attention?”

“To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.”

“The dog did nothing in the night-time.”

“That was the curious incident,” remarked Sherlock Holmes

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hurley (2008).

  2. 2.

    These two phenomena are the principle that “neurons that fire together wire together” (Spitzer, 1999, pp. 40–42) and the idea that a connection followed by a reinforcement will persist (Dennett, 1978, p. 71ff), respectively.

  3. 3.

    Hannah Arendt’s complaint against Eichmann “nicht denken” was that he had done what he had done without properly taking note of what he was dealing with—the lives of Jewish men, women, and children.

  4. 4.

    These are not the same, but the theory that Van Fraasen enunciates in Scientific Representation has a great deal in common with post-structuralism and the layers of interconnected meanings there.

References and Bibliography

  • Baars, B. (2002). The conscious access hypothesis: Origins and recent evidence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6(1), 47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L., Brezeal, C., & Smith, L. (2007). Cognition as coordinated non-cognition. Cognitive Process, 8, 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, S. (1984). Spreading the word. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. (2001). Paradox and cross purposes in recent work on consciousness. Cognition, 79, 197–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 181–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemero, A. (2011). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2006). Language and mind (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 351, 1413–1429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J., Gillett, G., & Kozma, R. (2016). Brentano on consciousness: A striking correlation with ECOG findings about the cognitive cycle and the emergence of knowledge and meaning. Mind and Matter, 13(1), 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S. (2014). Consciousness and the brain. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J. P. (2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron, 70, 200–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S., & Naccache, L. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1978). Brainstorms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (2003). Freedom evolves. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter if the mind. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R., & Newton, N. (2010). How the mind uses the brain: To move the body and image the universe. Chicago: Open Court Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (1982). The varieties of reference. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2008). Introduction to Kant’s anthropology. Los Angeles: Semiotexte (FKA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz, E. A., & Gillett, G. (2011). John Hughlings Jackson’s evolutionary neurology: A unifying framework for cognitive neuroscience. Brain, 134, 3114–3120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. (1994). Neural networks and chaos. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 171, 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. (2000). A neurobiological interpretation of semiotics: Meaning, representation and intention. Information Sciences, 124, 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. J. (2008). Nonlinear brain dynamics and intention according to Aquinas. Mind and Matter, 6(2), 207–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. J. (2015). Mechanism and significance of global coherence in scalp EEG. Current Opinion in Biology, 23, 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friston, K. (2010). The free energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews/Neuroscience, 11, 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, G. (2004). Bioethics and the clinic: Hippocratic reflections. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, G. (2008). Subjectivity and being somebody: Human identity and neuroethics (St Andrews Series on Philosophy and Public Affairs). Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, G., & Franz, L. (2014). Evolutionary neurology, responsive equilibrium, and the moral brain. Consciousness and Cognition. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105381001400172X

  • Gillett, G., & Liu, S. (2012). Free will and Necker’s cube: Reason, language and top-down control in cognitive neuroscience. Philosophy, 87(1), 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harre, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughlings Jackson, J. (1878). On affectations of speech from disease of the brain (1). Brain, I(III), 304–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughlings Jackson, J. (1879). On affectations of speech from disease of the brain (2). Brain, I(III), 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughlings Jackson, J. (1884). Croonian lectures on the evolution and dissolution of the nervous system. Lancet: (a) March 29, pp. 555–558; (b) April 12, pp. 649–652; and (c) 26, pp. 739–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughlings Jackson, J. (1887). Remarks on the evolution and dissolution of the nervous system. British Journal of Psychiatry, 33, 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurford, J. R. (2003). The neural basis of predicate-argument structure. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 261–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, S. (2008). The shared circuits model (SCM): How control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation and mindreading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 1–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1954 [1970]). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Chicago: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1909 [2012]). A pluralistic universe. The Floating Press. Retrieved from http://thefloatingpress.com/

  • Jennett, B., & Plum, F. (1972). Persistent vegetative state after brain damage. The Lancet, 1, 734–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (2010). Essays in the metaphysics of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • King, J. R., Sitt, J. D., Faugeras, F., Rohaut, B., El Karoui, I., Cohen, L., et al. (2013). Information sharing in the brain indexes consciousness in noncommunicative patients. Current Biology, 23, 1914–1919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimesch, W. (1999). EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance a review and analysis. Brain Research Reviews, 29, 169–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knott, A. (2012). Sensorimotor cognition and natural language syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, B., & Wishaw, I. (1990). The fundamentals of human neuropsychology. New York: W.H.Freeman & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 34, 57–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe, A. (2009). Out of our heads. New York: Hill & Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, J. K., & Noe, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Brain and Behavioural Sciences, 24, 939–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, A. (1996). Explorations in cognitive neuropsychology. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2010). The cognitive niche: Coevolution of intelligence, sociality and language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(s2), 8993–8999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. (1985). Anticipatory systems: Philosophical, mathematical, and methodological foundations. New York: Pergamum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J. P. (1971). Sketch for a theory of the emotions (P. Mairet, Trans.). London: Methuen & Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1997). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon, P. (2014). Persons, animals, ourselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, M. (1999). The mind within the net. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E., & Varela, F. (2001). Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5(10), 416–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2014). The natural history of human thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Orden, G., Pennington, B., & Stone, G. (2001). What do double dissociations prove? Cognitive Science, 25, 111–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962 [1929]). Thought and language (E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gillett, G. (2018). Evolutionary Neurology and the Human Soul. In: From Aristotle to Cognitive Neuroscience. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93635-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics