Skip to main content

Abstract

If the sampling frame does not have useful auxiliary information to reduce variances, multiphase sampling can be used. This chapter defines this type of sample design and gives real-life examples of multiphase designs. We examine the components needed to develop both base and analysis weights. Methods to determine overall sample size and allocation to phases are given. The chapter concludes with a discussion of software available for sample selection and analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/els2002/

  2. 2.

    http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/hsls09/

  3. 3.

    Sampling rates are typically set to limit the variation in the base weights and to limit the burden placed on the participating schools as measured by the student sample size.

  4. 4.

    http://www.lanacion.cl/eanna-primera-radiografia-de-los-ninos-y-adolescentes-de-chile/noticias/2012-02-15/133220.html

  5. 5.

    http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm

  6. 6.

    http://www3.norc.org/GSS+Website

  7. 7.

    http://www.census.gov/acs/www/

  8. 8.

    http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/

  9. 9.

    http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg.htm

  10. 10.

    The cancer treatment centers under this design are treated as the first-stage strata for point and variance estimation because all and not a sample of centers are included in the study. As an aside, mathematical modelers would label this “cancer treatment variable” a fixed effect. If a subset of centers were randomly chosen, then these first-stage clusters (PSUs) usually would be modeled as random effects.

  11. 11.

    Also, see the panel discussion on the appropriate uses of an fpc at Rust et al. (2006), as well as a correction for bias that is inherent in the jackknife (Lee and Kim 2002; Kim and Yu 2011)

  12. 12.

    http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/

  13. 13.

    http://www.census.gov/cps/

  14. 14.

    See, e.g., http://www.m-s-g.com/Web/genesys/List-Enhancement-Matching.aspx.

References

  • AAPOR. (2016b). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys, 9th edn. Tech. rep., The American Association for Public Opinion Research, Deerfield, IL, URL http://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf

  • Axinn W. G., Link C. F., Groves R. M. (2011). Responsive survey design, demographic data collection, and models of demographic behavior. Demography 48(3):1127–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bart J., Earnst S. (2002). Double sampling to estimate density and population trends in birds. The Auk 119(1):36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breivik H., Cherny N., Collett B., de Conno F., Filbet M., Foubert A. J., Cohen R., Dow L. (2009). Cancer-related pain: A pan-European survey of prevalence, treatment, and patient attitudes. Annals of Oncology 20(8):1420–1433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2017). American Time Use Survey User’s Guide, URL http://stats.bls.gov/tus/atususersguide.pdf

  • Callegaro M., Baker R., Bethlehem J., Göritz A., Krosnick J., Lavrakas P. (eds) (2014). Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casella G., Berger R. (2002). Statistical Inference. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran W. (1977). Sampling Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dever J. A., Valliant R. (2010). A comparison of variance estimators for poststratification to estimated control totals. Survey Methodology 36:45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman D. A., Smyth J. D., Christian L. M. (2009). Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezzati-Rice T., Rohde F., Greenblatt J. (2008). Sample design of the medical expenditure panel survey household component, 1998–2007. Tech. Rep. Methodology Report No. 22, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller W. A. (1998). Replication variance estimation for two-phase samples. Statistica Sinica 8:1153–1164.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Groves R. M., Heeringa S. G. (2006). Responsive design for household surveys: Tools for actively controlling survey errors and costs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A: Statistics in Society 169(3):439–457.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Groves R. M., Peytcheva E. (2008). The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias. Public Opinion Quarterly 72:167–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen M. H., Tepping B. J. (1990). Regression estimates in federal welfare quality control programs (C/R: P864–873). Journal of the American Statistical Association 85:856–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen M. H., Hurwitz W. N., Madow W. G. (1953a). Sample Survey Methods and Theory, Volume I. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidiroglou M. A. (2001). Double sampling. Survey Methodology 27(2):143–154.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Iannacchione V. G., Dever J. A., Bann C. M., Considine K. A., Creel D., Carson C. P., Best H. L., Haley R. W. (2011). Validation of a research case definition of Gulf War illness in the 1991 U.S. military population. Neuroepidemiology 37(2):129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingels S. J., Pratt D. J., Herget D., Dever J. A., Ottem R., Rogers J., Jin Y., Leinwand S. (2011). High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 (HSLS:09) base-year data file documention (NCES 2011-328). Tech. rep., National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalton G., Anderson D. (1986). Sampling rare populations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 149:65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J. K., Yu C. L. (2011). Replication variance estimation under two-phase sampling. Survey Methodology 37(1):67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J. K., Navarro A., Fuller W. A. (2006). Replication variance estimation for two-phase stratified sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 101(473):312–320.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Korn E. L., Graubard B. I. (1999). Analysis of Health Surveys. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kott P. S. (2006). Using calibration weighting to adjust for nonresponse and coverage errors. Survey Methodology 32(2):133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kott P. S., Stukel D. M. (1997). Can the jackknife be used with a two-phase sample? Survey Methodology 23:81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreuter F., Couper M. P., Lyberg L. (2010). The use of paradata to monitor and manage survey data collection. In: Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, pp 282–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee H., Kim J. K. (2002). Jackknife variance estimation for two-phase samples with high sampling fractions. In: Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, pp 2024–2028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepkowski J., Axinn W. G., Kirgis N., West B. T., Ndiaye S. K., Mosher W., Groves R. M. (2010). Use of paradata in a responsive design framework to manage a field data collection. NSFG Survey Methodology Working Papers (10-012), URL http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pubs/pdf/ng10-012.pdf

  • Little R. J. A., Rubin D. B. (2002). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J., Aragon E. (2000). Subsampling strategies in longitudinal surveys. In: Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, pp 307–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohr S. L. (1999). Sampling: Design and Analysis. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuo H., Billiet J., Loosveldt G., Berglund F., Kleven Ø. (2010). Measurement and adjustment of non-response bias based on non-response surveys: The case of Belgium and Norway in the European Social Survey round 3. Survey Research Methods 4:165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller P. (2014). What does adaptive design mean to you? https://www.census.gov/fedcasic/fc2014/ppt/keynote_miller.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyman J. (1938). Contribution to the theory of sampling human populations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 33(201):101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peytchev A. (2014). Models and interventions in adaptive and responsive survey designs. DC AAPOR, http://dc-aapor.org/ModelsInterventionsPeytchev.pdf

  • Potter F. J., Iannacchione V. G., Mosher W., Mason R., Kavee J. A. (1998). Sample design, sampling weights, imputation, and variance estimation in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital and Health Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics 124(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao J. N. K. (1973). On double sampling for stratification and analytical surveys (Corr: V60 p669). Biometrika 60:125–133.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • RTI International. (2012). SUDAAN Language Manual, Release 11.0. Research Triangle Park, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust K., Graubard B., Fuller W. A., Stokes S. L., Kott P. S. (2006). Finite population correction factors (Panel Discussion). In: Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, ResearchGate [Accessed 14-Feb-2018]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251618326_Finite_Population_Correction_Factors_Panel_Discussion

  • Särndal C., Lundström S. (2005). Estimation in Surveys with Nonresponse. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Särndal C., Swensson B., Wretman J. (1992). Model Assisted Survey Sampling. Springer, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schouten B., Peytchev A., Wagner J. (2017). Adaptive Survey Design. Chapman and Hall/CRC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A. C., Dever J. A., Iannacchione V. G. (2004). Composite response rates for surveys with nonresponse follow-up. In: Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, pp 4343–4350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A. C., Dever J. A., Iannacchione V. G., Chen S. (2005). Efficient estimation of response rates when a small subsample of nonrespondents is selected for follow-up conversion. In: Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology (FCSM) Conference, Arlington, VA, URL http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.160.2189&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Tourangeau R., Brick J. M., Lohr S. L., Li J. (2017). Adaptive and responsive survey designs: A review and assessment. Statistics in Society, Series A 180(1):203–223, URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rssa.12186/full

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Valliant R. (1993). Poststratification and conditional variance estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88:89–96.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Valliant R. (2004). The effect of multiple weight adjustments on variance estimation. Journal of Official Statistics 20:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Valliant, R., Dever, J.A., Kreuter, F. (2018). Multiphase Designs. In: Practical Tools for Designing and Weighting Survey Samples. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93632-1_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics