Skip to main content

Integrating CSR in Innovation Value Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovation Management and Corporate Social Responsibility

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

  • 2949 Accesses

Abstract

Innovating in today’s complex, globalized, interconnected markets requires collaborating in stakeholder value networks. It is increasingly unlikely that a single organization possesses all the required resources, power and competences to effectively conduct the full innovation process on its own (Sarkis et al. 2010). Organizations have to find new forms of collaboration to create more sustainable outcomes of the innovation process and to establish long-term relations with their partners and other stakeholders. This development is enhanced by pressure from all kinds of stakeholders to integrate corporate social responsibility (CSR) into organizations’ innovation efforts. The growing interest in CSR among business firms is evident from the high number of organizations that now participate in evaluative firm rankings that benchmark their CSR performance (Chabowski et al. 2011). A BCG study among executives of globally operating firms found that 70% of the participating firms have placed CSR permanently on their management agenda (BCG 2012). For example, environmentally legitimate firms have been found to incur less unsystematic stock market risks (Bansal and Clelland 2004), investors have also realized the added value of organizational CSR efforts. Likewise, consumers are becoming increasingly aware of the effects of their own choices (Peloza et al. 2013) and stricter legislation on environmental impact and labor rights are other external triggers for increasing CSR efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The longitudinal case study was a core part of the project “IOP–TOV”, sponsored by Rijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland (RVO). More information on the project can be found at: http://www.ru.nl/nsm/imr/our-research/hot-spots/innovation-and-entrepreneurship-in-business/selected-projects/projects-0/tools-orchestrating-value-chains-sustainability/

References

  • Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., HĂĄkansson, H., & Johanson, J. (1994). Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arevalo, J. A., CastellĂł, I., de Colle, S., Lenssen, G., Neumann, K., & Zollo, M. (2011). Introduction to the special issue: Integrating sustainability in business models. Journal of Management Development, 30(10), 941–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avadikyan, A., Llerena, P., Matt, M., Rozan, A., & Wolff, S. (2001). Organisational rules, codification and knowledge creation in inter-organisation cooperative agreements. Research Policy, 30(9), 1443–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartel, C. A., & Garud, R. (2009). The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation. Organization Science, 20(1), 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. (2006). Finding, forming, and performing: Creating networks for discontinuous innovation (Doctoral dissertation). Institute of Management Research Tanaka Business School, Imperial College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG). (2012). Sustainability nears a tipping point. MIT Sloan Management Review Research Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouman, M., James, P., & Wolters, T. (1997). Stepping-stones for integrated chain management in the firm. Business Strategy and the Environment, 6(3), 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busquets, J. (2010). Orchestrating smart business network dynamics for innovation. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(4), 481–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byggeth, S., & Hochschorner, E. (2006). Handling trade-offs in Ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(15–16), 1420–1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capaldo, A. (2007). Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6), 585–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEPE Annual Report. (2013). Retrieved June 2018, from http://www.cepe.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/01/CEPE_annual_report_2013.pdf

  • Chabowski, B., Mean, J., & Gonzalez-Padron, T. (2011). The structure of sustainability research in marketing, 1958-2008: A basis for future research opportunities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006). Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 659–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, D., & Dunne, D. D. (2011). Organizing ecologies of complex innovation. Organization Science, 22(5), 1214–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L., Olk, P. M., & Ring, P. S. (2000). Formation processes of R&D consortia: Which path to take? Where does it lead? Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 239–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J., Emerson, J., & Beloe, S. (2006). The value palette: A tool for full spectrum strategy. California Management Review, 48(2), 6–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa, A., Lerch, J., & Krout, R. (2004). Explicit vs. implicit coordination mechanism and task dependencies: One size does not fit all. In E. Salas, S. M. Fiore, & J. A. Cannon-Bowers (Eds.), Team cognition: Process and performance at the inter- and intra- individual level (pp. 107–129). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraj, S., & Xiao, Y. (2006). Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Science, 52(8), 1155–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., & Gehman, J. (2012). Metatheoretical perspectives on sustainability journeys: Evolutionary, relational and duration. Research Policy, 41(6), 980–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A., & Soda, G. (1995). Inter-firm networks: Antecedents, mechanism and forms. Organization Studies, 16(2), 183–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Puranam, P., & Tushman, M. (2012a). Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 571–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Wohlgezogen, F., & Zhelyazkov, P. (2012b). The two facets of collaboration. The Academy of Management Annuals, 6(1), 531–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henard, D. H., & Szymanski, D. M. (2001). Why some new products are more successful than others. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 362–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human, S. E., & Provan, K. G. (2000). Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm multilateral networks: A comparative study of success and demise. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 327–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvensivu, T., & Möller, K. (2009). Metatheory of network management: A contingency perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(6), 654–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P. A., LĂŞ, J. K., & Feldman, M. S. (2012). Toward a theory of coordinating: Creating coordinating mechanisms in practice. Organization Science, 23(4), 907–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Hesterly, W., & Borgatti, S. (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanism. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, M. A., Kuhn, T. R., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2012). A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 332–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Reeves, M., & Goh, E. (2013). The benefits of sustainability-driven innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(2), 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 26(1), 87–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 314–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R., & Hunt, S. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murnighan, J., & Conlon, D. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 165–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S., & Sawhney, M. (2011). Orchestration processes in network-centric innovation. The Academy of Management perspectives, 25(3), 40–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobelius, D. (2004). Towards the sixth generation of R&D management. International Journal of Product Development, 22(5), 369–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, S., & Ferraro, F. (2007). The emergence of governance in an open source community. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1079–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paquin, R. L., & Howard-Grenville, J. (2013). Blind dates and arranged marriages: Longitudinal processes of network orchestration. Organization Studies, 34(11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peloza, J., White, K., & Shang, J. (2013). Good and guilt-free: The role of self-accountability in influencing preferences for products with ethical attributes. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 104–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peppard, J., & Rylander, A. (2006). From value chain to value network: Insights for mobile operators. European Management Journal, 24(2–3), 128–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujari, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development: Understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26(1), 76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J., Cordeiro, J. J., & Brust, D. A. V. (2010). Facilitating sustainability innovation through collaboration. In J. Sarkis (Ed.), Facilitating sustainability innovation through collaboration. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Slawinski, N., & Bansal, P. (2012). A matter of time: The temporal perspectives of organizational responses to climate change. Organization Studies, 33(11), 1537–1563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, L. Z., & Song, M. (2010). The role of information technologies in enhancing R&D–marketing integration: An empirical investigation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(3), 382–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (1999). Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 684–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente, M. (2012). Theorizing firm adoption of sustaincentrism. Organization Studies, 33(4), 563–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., Polley, D. E., Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. (1999). The innovation journey. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaverbeke, W., & Cloodt, M. (2006). Open innovation in value networks. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED. (1987). Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenbaum, G. M., Stasser, G., & Merry, C. J. (1996). Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(2), 129–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen L. Janssen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Janssen, K.L., Blazevic, V., Lauche, K. (2018). Integrating CSR in Innovation Value Networks. In: Altenburger, R. (eds) Innovation Management and Corporate Social Responsibility. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93629-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics