Urban Transformation - Cultural Heritage and Local Economic Development: The Public Sector on the Battlefront?

  • Robert KnippschildEmail author
  • Constanze Zöllter
Part of the EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing book series (EAISICC)


Many cities of Central and Eastern Europe beyond their booming metropolitan hubs are suffering from stagnation, declining populations and poor economic development. At the same time, these cities frequently possess a rich cultural heritage, which, at a time of digital transformation and congested urban centres, can be an asset in the fight to regain economic competitiveness. Often, however, existing building stock does not meet current residential or commercial needs. Coordination between the public and private sectors, as well as within the public sector, is needed to resolve the conflicting aims of preserving cultural heritage and ensuring local economic development. Currently, the city of Görlitz is striking out in a new direction by articulating and testing a matrix designed to assess both heritage preservation and urban development. The present chapter explains this tool and discusses some initial experiences.


Revitalization Urban transformation Cultural heritage preservation Planning instruments 


  1. BBSR – Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung im Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (BBR) (eds) (2017) Mehr Qualität durch Gestaltungsbeiräte. Perspektiven für die Baukultur in Städten und Gemeinden [Better quality through boards of advisers for design issues. Perspectives for building culture in cities and communities], BonnGoogle Scholar
  2. European Commission/Eurostat (2017) Urban Europe—statistics on cities, towns and suburbs—executive summary. Accessed 11 Jan 2018
  3. Fol S, Cunningham-Sabot E (2010) “Déclin urbain” et Shrinking Cities: une évaluation critique des approches de la décroissance urbaine. Ann Géograph 674(4):359–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goerlitz (2015) Goerlitz for many the most beautiful city on Germant. Accessed 31 July 2018
  5. Menzel W (2016) Görlitzer Modell: Stadtumbau-Matrix. Bewertungssystem zur Weiterentwicklung innerstädtischer Bausubstanz [The Görlitz Model: Urban Transformation Matrix. An evaluation system for developing the inner-city building stock]. Unpublished presentation as draft resolution for the city council of the city of Görlitz. Accessed 4 May 2016Google Scholar
  6. Nasser N (2003) Planning for urban heritage places: reconciling conservation, tourism, and sustainable development. J Plan Lit 17(4):467–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nefs M, Alves S, Zasada I, Haase D (2013) Shrinking cities as retirement cities? Opportunities for shrinking cities as green living environments for older individuals. Environ Plan A Econ Space 45(6):1455–1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Panagopoulos T, Guimarães MH, Barreira AP (2015) Influences on citizens’ policy preferences for shrinking cities: a case study of four Portuguese cities. Reg Stud Reg Sci 2(1):141–170Google Scholar
  9. Ryberg-Webster S, Kinahan KL (2017) Historic preservation in declining city neighbourhoods: analysing rehabilitation tax credit investments in six US cities. Urban Stud 54(7):1673–1691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ryberg-Webster S, Kinahan KL (2014) Historic preservation and urban revitalization in the twenty-first century. J Plan Lit 29(2):119–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wolff M, Wiechmann T (2017) Urban growth and decline: Europe’s shrinking cities in a comparative perspective 1990–2010. Eur Urban Reg Stud 25(2):122–139. Accessed 9 Feb 2018

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development & Technische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
  2. 2.Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional DevelopmentDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations