Advertisement

Forest Commons as a Model for Territorial Governance

  • Rudina TotoEmail author
Chapter
  • 243 Downloads
Part of the EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing book series (EAISICC)

Abstract

Territorial governance enables territorial development, moving away from sectorial approaches, towards place-based and highly adaptable models. Most territorial governance studies take a socio-institutional, or spatial planning perspective. Still, territorial governance happens in and through other policy domains, interacting among them and with the territory in various ways, to produce territorial development. The sustainability of the latter is affected by the presence of collective action and socio-ecological resilience, best seen through the study of socio-ecological interactions. As an example to unravelling territorial governance through lenses of other policy domains, this chapter examines ecosystem-based forest commons’ governance. Resilience of forest commons as resources and as institutions leads the society towards sustainable territorial development at local and global scales. The illustration of this account comes through exploring the Albanian model of forest commons within a river basin. The model embodies all ecosystem values besides the merely utilitarian ones and discusses the dimensions of territorial governance for forest commons. It does so through fit-to-context factors for robustness and adaptability. Evidences are collected through visual surveys, interviews, and focus groups systematically researching a number of commons’ variables of endurance and functionality.

Keywords

Forest commons Territorial governance Ecosystem services Polycentric governance 

References

  1. Agrawal A (2000) Small is beautiful, but is larger better? Forest-management institutions in the Kumaon Himalaya, India. In: Gibson CC, McKean MA, Ostrom E (eds) People and forests: communities, institutions and governance. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 57–86Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal A (2003) Sustainable governance of common-pool resources: context, methods, and politics. Annu Rev Anthropol 32:243–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alcántara CHD (1998) Uses and abuses of the concept of governance. Int Soc Sci J 155:105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander GS, Penalver EM (2012) An introduction to property theory. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Araral E, Hartley K (2013) Polycentric governance for a new environmental regime: theoretical frontiers in policy reform and public administration. In International conference on public policy. Grenoble, 2013. IPPA (International Public Policy Association). http://archives.ippapublicpolicy.org/IMG/pdf/panel_46_s1_araral_hartley.pdf. Accessed 23 Apr 2018
  6. Armitage D (2008) Governance and the commons in a multi-level world. Int J Commons, 2, pp 7–32. http://www.thecommonsjournal.org; URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-IJC-08002. Accessed 23 Apr 2018
  7. Arnouts R, Van Der Zouwen M, Arts B (2012) Analysing governance modes and shifts — governance arrangements in Dutch nature policy. Forest Policy Econ 16:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beatley T (1994) Ethical land use: principles of policy and planning. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertrand F, Richard E, Larrue C (2016) Climate problem and territorial governance: an overview of adaptation initiatives at the French regional level. In: Knieling JGF (ed) Climate adaptation governance in cities and regions: theoretical fundamentals and practical evidence, 1st edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 191–208Google Scholar
  10. Blatter J (2004) ‘From Spaces of Place’ to ‘Spaces of Flows’? Territorial and functional governance in cross-border regions in Europe and North America. Int J Urban Reg Res 28(3):530–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Böhme K, Zillmer S, Toptsidou M, Holstein F (2015) Territorial governance and cohesion policy study. Directorate General for Internal Policies. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies. Accessed 23 Apr 2018
  12. Braat LC, de Groot R (2012) The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosyst Serv 1(1):4–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brnkaláková S (2016) Adaptive management of mountain ecosystem services. Dissertation Thesis, Slovak University of Technology, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  14. Burkhard B, Muller F (2015) Indicators and quantification approaches. In: Grunewald K, Bastian O (eds) Ecosystem services - concept, methods and case studies. Springer, Berlin, pp 76–85Google Scholar
  15. CEMAT (2010) Council of Europe Conference of Ministers responsible for Spatial/Regional Planning (CEMAT): basic texts 1970-2010Exts. Territory and Landscape No. 3. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/16804895e4. Accessed 23 Apr 2018
  16. Chan KMA et al (2011) Cultural services and non-use values. In: Kareiva P et al (eds) Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. CoR (2014) On the mid-term review of Europe 2020: Athens declaration - a territorial vision for growth and jobs. Athens: Committee of the Regions Committee of the Regions. http://cor.europa.eu/en/news/Documents/2210-athens-declaration-a5.pdf; http://cor.europa.eu/en/news/Pages/regions-cities-athens-declaration.aspx. Accessed 23 Apr 2018
  18. Cox M (2014) Understanding large social-ecological systems: introducing the SESMAD project. Int J Commons 8(2):265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cox M, Arnold G and Villamayor-Tomás S (2010) A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecol Soc, 15(4), p.38. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art38/. Accessed 23 April 2018
  20. CSD (1999) ESDP European Spatial Development Perspective: towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European Union. European Commission Committee on Spatial Development, Potsdam. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/pdf/sum_en.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2018
  21. Davoudi S, Cowie P (2016) ‘Good’ territorial governance. In: Schmitt P, Well LV (eds) Territorial governance across Europe pathways, practices and prospects. Routledge, Oxon, pp 48–59Google Scholar
  22. Davoudi S, Evans N, Governa F, Santangelo M (2008) Territorial governance in the making: approaches, methodologies, practices. B Asoc Geogr Esp 46:351–355Google Scholar
  23. Derissen S, Quaas M, Baumgärtner S (2009) The relationship between resilience and sustainable development of ecological-economic systems. Working Paper Series in Economics, 146. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/30245/1/61690682X.pdf. Accessed 24 April 2018
  24. Driessen PPJ et al (2012) Towards a conceptual framework for the study of shifts in modes of environmental governance – experiences from the Netherlands. Env Pol Gov 22:143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. European Commission (2009) Green paper on territorial cohesion – turning territorial diversity into strength. [Online] http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/consultation/terco/consultation_en.htm. Accessed 23 Nov 2017
  26. European Commission (2018) A credible enlargement perspective for and enhanced EU engagement with the Western Balkans. COM(2018) 65 final. European Commission European Commission, Strasbourg. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions; https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/communication-credible-enlargement-perspective-western-balkans_en.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2018
  27. Faludi A (2012) Multi-level (territorial) governance: three criticisms. Plan Theory Pract 13(2):197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Faludi A (2016) Territorial governance challenging government. In: Schmitt P, Van Well L (eds) Territorial governance across Europe: pathways, practices and prospects. Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar
  29. FAO (2015) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. [Online] FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4808e.pdf. Accessed 27 Aug 2017
  30. FAO (2016) State of the World’s Forests 2016 - forests and agriculture: land-use challenges and opportunities. FAO. Excerpt From: “State of the World’s Forests 2016.” iBooksGoogle Scholar
  31. Finka M, Kluvánková-Oravská T (2010) Concept of polycentricity in current theory and practice of territorial governance. Prognostické práce 2(1):23–37Google Scholar
  32. Finka M, Kluvánková T, Ondrejička V (2015) Concept of soft polycentric governance for fuzzy soft spaces as a challenge for central European peripheral spaces. In: Lang T, Henn S, Sgibnev W, Ehrlich K (eds) Understanding geographies of polarization and peripheralization perspectives from central and Eastern Europe and beyond. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 309–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fleischman F, Loken B, Garcia-Lopez GA, Villamayor-Tomas S (2014/a) Evaluating the utility of common-pool resource theory for understanding forest governance and outcomes in Indonesia between 1965 and 2012. Int J Commons, 8(2), 304–336Google Scholar
  34. Gjeçovi S (1925) Kanuni i Lekë Dukagjinit [The Kanun of Lekë Dukagjini]. Shtëpia Botuese “Kuvendi”, TiranëGoogle Scholar
  35. GoA (1992) “Për pyjet dhe policinë e shërbimit pyjor” (law on forests and forests police) no. 7623. Qendra e Botimeve Zyrtare, TiranëGoogle Scholar
  36. GoA (2005) “Për Pyjet dhe Shërbimin Pyjor” [Law on forests and forestry service] No.9385. 04 May. p 1573Google Scholar
  37. Goulder L, Kennedy D (2011) Interpreting and estimating the value of ecosystem services. In: Kareiva P et al (eds) Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Grunewald K, Bastian O, Syrbe RU (2015) Space and time aspects of ES ecosystem services: concept, methods and case studies. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grünwald A, Wende W (2015) Integrating the concept of ecosystem services into landscape planning. In: Grunewald K, Bastian O (eds) Ecosystem services, concept. Methods and case studies. Springer, Berlin, pp 165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2011) Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): 2011 Update. [Online] European Environment Agency. Paper prepared for discussion at the expert meeting on ecosystem accounts organised by the UNSD, the EEA and the World Bank. https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2009/11/CICES_Update_Nov2011.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2017
  41. Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2012) Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): consultation on Version 4. [Online] European Environment Agency. Report to the European Environment Agency; EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003. https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2012/07/CICES-V43_Revised-Final_Report_29012013.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2017. Revised January 2013
  42. Hajer M, Wagenaar H (2003) Introduction. In: Hajer MA, Hendrik Wagenaar H (eds) Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Halkier H (2012) Knowledge dynamics and policies for regional development: towards a new governance paradigm. Eur Plan Stud 20(11):1767–1784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Handmer JW and Dovers SR (1996) A typology of resilience: rethinking institutions for sustainable development. Organization Env, 9(4), p.482. http://oae.sagepub.com/content/9/4/482. Accessed 24 Apr 2018
  45. Healey P (2006) Transforming governance: challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space. Eur Plan Stud 14(3):299–320Google Scholar
  46. Hooghe L, Marks G (2003) Unravelling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. Am Polit Sci Rev 97(2):233–243Google Scholar
  47. Hysing E (2009) From government to governance? A comparison of environmental governing in Swedish Forestry and Transport. Governance 22(4):647–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. INSTAT (2016) Fondi Pyjor sipas Pronesisë [Forest Fund as per Ownership]. [Online] http://www.instat.gov.al/al/themes/mjedisi.aspx. Accessed 24 Apr 2017
  49. Kareiva P et al (eds) (2011) Natural capital, theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Keating M (2009) Rescaling Europe. Perspect Eur Polit Soc 10(1):34–50Google Scholar
  51. Kluvánková T, Gežík V (2016) Survival of commons? Institutions for robust forest social-ecological systems. [Online] Elsevier.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2016.01.002. Accessed 2 Mar 2017
  52. Kovač P, Tomaževič N, Leben A, Aristovnik A (2016) Reforming public administration in Slovenia: between theory and practice of good governance and good administration. Int J Public Policy 12(3/4/5/6):130–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kooiman J (ed) (1993) Modern governance: new government–society interactions. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  54. Kooiman J (ed) (2003) Governing as governance. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Lange P (2017) Sustainability governance: exploring the potential of governance modes to promote sustainable development. NomosGoogle Scholar
  56. Li TM (2006) Neo-Liberal Strategies of Government through Community: the Social Development Program of the World Bank in Indonesia. International Law and Justice Working Papers, Global Administrative Law SeriesGoogle Scholar
  57. Low B et al (1999) Human–ecosystem interactions: a dynamic integrated model. Ecol Econ 31:227–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Luque S, Gonzalez-Redin J, Furst C (2017) Mapping forest ecosystem services. In: Burkhard B, Maes J (eds) Mapping ecosystem services. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, pp 324–328Google Scholar
  59. MA (2005a) Ecosystem and human Well-being synthesis. Island Press Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  60. MA (2005b) Current state and trends assessment - chapter 21: forest systems. Island Press Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  61. Maes J et al (2012) Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosyst Serv 1:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Marsh WM (2010) Landscape planning environmental applications, Fifth edn. Wiley, DanversGoogle Scholar
  63. Meadowcroft J, Langhelle O, Ruud A (2012) Governance, democracy and sustainable development: moving beyond the impasse. In: Meadowcroft J, Langhelle O, Ruud A (eds) Governance, democracy and sustainable development: moving beyond the impasse. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Glos, pp 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Merino L (2015) Reflections on the governance of the global commons. Commons Digest 17:10–13 Publication of the International Association for the Study of the CommonsGoogle Scholar
  65. Ministria e Ekonomisë Kombëtare (1930) Ligja e Pyjeve e Kullosave [Law on forests and pastures]. Botime të Ministrisë së Ekonomisë Kombëtare, Shtypshkronja “Tirana”, Tiranë, AlbaniaGoogle Scholar
  66. Moran E (2005) Human-environment interactions in forest ecosystems: an introduction. In: Moran EF, Ostrom E (eds) Seeing the forest and the trees: human-environment interactions in forest ecosystems. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  67. Muharremaj V (2003) Pyjet dhe Kullotat [Forests and pastures]. In: Agolli S, Përmeti M (eds) Historia e Bujqësisë dhe Agroindustrisë Shqiptare. KEA, Tiranë, Albania, pp 243–295Google Scholar
  68. Muharremaj V et al (2009) Studim mbi Kuadrin Ligjor për Pyjet dhe Kullotat Komunale në Shqipëri [A study on the legal framework of communal forests and pastures in Albania]. SNV-Sida, TiranëGoogle Scholar
  69. Nagendra H, Ostrom E (2012) Polycentric governance of multifunctional forested landscapes. Int J Commons 6(2):104–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. National Agency of Protected Areas (2015) Protected areas [Zonat e Mbrojtura]. [Online]. http://akzm.gov.al/index.php?option=com_k2&view=itemlist&layout=category&task=category&id=5&Itemid=289〈=en. Accessed 17 Mar 2017
  71. Olson M (1965/2002) The logic of collective action - public goods and the theory of groups, 20th edn. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  72. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons, the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ostrom E (1999) Design principles and threats to sustainable organisations that manage commons. [Online] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/42766234_Design_Principles_and_Threats_to_Sustainable_Organizations_that_Manage_Commons. Accessed 16 Aug 2017
  74. Ostrom E (2003) How types of goods and property rights jointly affect collective action. J Theor Policies 15(3):239–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692803015003002
  75. Ostrom E (2009a) Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. [Online] http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/2009/ostrom_lecture.pdf. Accessed 15 August 2017. Prize Lecture
  76. Ostrom E (2009b) Design principles of robust property-rights institutions: what have we learned? Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  77. Ostrom V, Tiebout CM Warren R (1961) The organization of government in metropolitan areas: theoretical inquiry. Am Polit Sci Rev, 55(4), pp.831–842. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1952530. Accessed 24 Apr 2018
  78. Palahi M, Mavsar R, Gracia C, Birot Y (2008) Mediterranean forests under focus. Int For Rev 10(4):676–688Google Scholar
  79. Pejovich S (1990) The economics of property rights: towards a theory of comparative systems, International studies in economics and econometrics. SpringerScience+Business Media, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  80. Perrings C (2006) Resilience and sustainable development. Env Dev Econ 11:417–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Piattoni S (2010) The theory of multi-level governance: conceptual, empirical, and normative challenges. Oxford University, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  82. Rametsteiner E (2009) Governance concepts and their application in forest policy initiatives from global to local levels. Small-scale Forest 8(2):143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Raymond L (2003) Private rights in public resources, equity and property allocation in market-based environmental policy. RFF Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  84. Raymond R (2008) Agreements and controversies around the notion of territorial governance: a bibliographic review of a fashionable notion. Int J Sustain Dev 11(2/3/4):115–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rhodes RAW (1996) The new governance: governing without government. Politico1 Stiidia XLIV:652–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rivolin UJ (2010) Spatial units for EU territorial governance: findings from a study on north-western Italy. Eur Plann Stud 18(2):299–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Satake A, Rudel TK, Onuma A (2008) Scale mismatches and their ecological and economic effects on landscapes: a spatially explicit model. Glob Environ Challenge 18(4):768–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Schiappacasse P, Müller B (2018) Identifying gaps and opportunities for research on urban and regional resilience—highlighting the advantages of research cooperation. In: Müller B, Shimizu H (eds) Towards the implementation of the new urban agenda. Springer, Berlin, pp 259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Schmitt P, Well LV (eds) (2016a) Territorial governance across Europe: pathways practices and prospects. Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar
  90. Schmitt P, Well LV (2016b) Revisiting territorial governance: twenty empirically informed components. In: Schmitt P, Well LV (eds) Territorial governance across Europe: pathways, practices and prospects. Routledge, Oxon, pp 221–237Google Scholar
  91. Schmitt P et al (2013) ESPON TANGO – Territorial approaches for new governance. Scientific report. ESPON & Nordregio ESPON, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  92. Shoeibi S, Bürger-Arndt R, Hubo C (2015) Forest ecosystem services - the state of European Policies and Scientific Knowledge. Master Thesis, OmniScriptum GmbH&Co. KG., SaarbrückenGoogle Scholar
  93. Shutina D, Toto R (2010) Parathenie. In: Shutina D, Toto R (eds) Politikëndjekës apo Politiëbërës: Alternativa mbi zhvillimin urban, manaxhimin e territorit dhe të mjedisit [Policyfollowers or Policymakers: Alternatives on urban development, territorial and environmental management], 1st edn. Co-PLAN and IKZH_POLIS, Tiranë, pp 9–14Google Scholar
  94. Shutina D, Toto R (2017) Unraveling territorial governance in Albania – a policy decision or an intuitive approach? In Territorial governance and spatial planning in the Western Balkan Region. Torino, 2017, Politecnico di TorinoGoogle Scholar
  95. Stead D (2013) Dimensions of territorial governance. Plann Theory Pract 14(1):142–147MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Stead D (2014) The rise of territorial governance in European policy. Eur Plann Stud 22(7):1368–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Stead D, Pálné Kovács I (2016) Shifts in governance and government across Europe. In: Schmitt P, Well LV (eds) Territorial governance across Europe: pathways, practices and prospects. Routledge, Oxon, pp 21–35Google Scholar
  98. Stoker G (1998) Governance as theory: five propositions. Int Soc Sci J 50(155):17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Toto R (2018) Ecosystem-based governance of forest commons - the case of Shkumbini River basin. IDAUP Ferrara University, POLIS University, Tiranë, AlbaniaGoogle Scholar
  100. UN-Habitat (2002) The global campaign on urban governance, Concept paper, 2nd ed. UN-Habitat. https://unhabitat.org/books/global-campaign-on-urban-governance-the/. Accessed 24 Apr 2018
  101. United Nations (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2017
  102. United Nations (2014) The value of forests, payments for ecosystem services in Green Economy. ECE/TIM/SP/34. Geneva, United NationsGoogle Scholar
  103. Van Oel R, Krol MS, Hoekstra A (2009) A river basin as a common-pool resource: a case study for the Jaguaribe basin in the semi-arid Northeast of Brazil. Int J River Basin Manage 7(4):345–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Well LV, Schmitt P (2015) Understanding territorial governance: conceptual and practical implications. Eur Reg 21(4):209–221Google Scholar
  105. Well LV, Schmitt P (2016) Territorial governance across Europe: setting the stage. In: Well LV, Schmitt P (eds) Territorial governance across Europe: pathways, practices and prospects. Routledge, Oxon, pp 3–20Google Scholar
  106. WWF (2017) Forest habitat. https://www.worldwildlife.org/habitats/forest-habitat. Accessed 25 Aug 2017
  107. Young OR (2013) On environmental governance: sustainability, efficiency, and equity, Series: On politics, 2nd edn. Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Permanent Workshop on Territorial Governance, Co-PLAN, Institute for Habitat DevelopmentPOLIS UniversityTiranaAlbania

Personalised recommendations