Skip to main content

Innovations and Changing Role of Public Sector in Spatial Development Strategies: Problems and Challenges for Local and Regional Development in Central and Eastern European Countries After 2020

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Role of Public Sector in Local Economic and Territorial Development

Abstract

The global transformation processes of the society at the edge of twentieth and twenty-first century accelerated by the transition processes in majority of the countries in Central and Eastern Europe represent huge challenge for spatial development. Moreover, they deeply concern not only the development of the physical and functional structures, functioning and qualitative and quantitative changes in the Central European cities and regions, but they represent crucial changes in the nature of the spatial development management as well. The shift from government to governance framed by the movement towards civil society development is combined with the fuzzification and softening of the borders between functional and administrative spatial units, with the multiplication of the relevant actors in spatial development and increased spatial effects of their individual decisions, with the regionalisation of local policies, as well as state policies and with the shift from ecologisation towards economisation of spatial planning (Understanding geographies of polarization and peripheralization: perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe and Beyond. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2015). Spatial development is about intensive interplay between all hierarchical levels, between different temporal dimensions, and between public and private actors. The public sector representatives are more and more diverse, going far behind the governmental and self-governmental bodies. They play specific role in the management of spatial development being more and more limited in their operational space by strong economic interests, interests expressed by broad public and responsibilities for safeguarding societal values and sustainability. The role of public authorities is changing in the development and implementation of spatial development strategies as their position among public sector representatives is changing (Multilevel governance for balanced development between core and peripheral spaces. České vysoké učení technické, Praha, 2015). The examples from Slovakia and other European Countries show the problems and challenges connected with this development as well as the whole range of creative solutions and possibilities to strengthen the quality and efficiency of public interventions towards meeting the goals of spatial development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Dostál I, Jedlička J, Kortanová J (2010) Planning for sustainable development of towns and villages. In: Adamec V, Jandová V (eds) IV Czech-Slovak scientific conference “Transport, Health and Environment”. Transport Research Centre, Brno

    Google Scholar 

  • Finka M, Kluvánková T (2015) Managing complexity of urban systems: a polycentric approach. Land Use Policy 42:602–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finka M et al (2012) Bezpečnosť ako kvalita priestoru—úvod do problematiky [Safety as spatial quality—introduction into the topic]. ROAD/Centrum urbánnej bezpečnosti, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Finka M et al (2013) Governing under the complexity and uncertainty. In: Kluvankova-Oravska T, Jilkova J (eds) From governing to governance resonsidered. Verbum, Ružomberok, p 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Finka M, Kluvánková T, Ondrejička V (2015) Concept of polycentric governance for fuzzy soft spaces as a challenge for Central European Peripheral Spaces. In: Lang T, Henn S, Sgibnev W, Ehrlich K (eds) Understanding geographies of polarization and peripheralization: perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe and Beyond. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 309–322

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Husár M (2015) Cities of tomorrow? Smart city as an imperative for sustainability in the future. Bratislava: In Terra Spectra STU. Planning Studies., 2015. Zv. 7, 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Husár M, Varis SC, Ondrejicka V (2017) Analysis of the planning education in the light of the contemporary trends in planning. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 95(5):052005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/95/5/052005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamečný L, Husár M (2016) From planning to smart management of historic industrial brownfield. Procedia Engineering. Prague: World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering-Architecture-Urban Planning Symposium 2016, WMCAUS 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaššo M (2008) Cross-border cooperation challenges: positioning the Vienna-Bratislava region. In: Cross-border governance and sustainable spatial development: mind the gaps! Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaššo M, Petríková D (2016) Place attachment and social communities in the concept of smart cities. In: Leon-Garcia A et al (eds) Smart City 360°. SmartCity 360 2016, SmartCity 360 2015. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering. Springer, Cham, pp 721–728

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaššo M et al (2014) Plánovací systém priestorového rozvoja a plánovacia kultúra v slovenskej republike [Planning system of spatial development and planning culture in the Slovak Republic]. In: Schoeffel J, Jamečný L, Ondrejičková S (eds) Participatívne plánovanie na úrovni samospráv [Participative planning on municipality level]. SPECTRA Centre of Excellence, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang T (2015) Socio-economic and political responses to regional polarisation and socio-spatial peripheralisation in Central and Eastern Europe: a research agenda. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 64(3):171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005) “The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data: Oslo Manual, Third Edition” prepared by the Working Party of National Experts on Scientific and Technology Indicators, OECD, Paris, para. 71

    Google Scholar 

  • Ondrejička V, Finka M (2016) Innovative approaches to strategic socioeconomic planning of territorial subjects. Vysoka Skola Ekonomicka v Praze, Praha, pp 176–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Ondrejička V, Ondrejičková S (2014) “Trenčín si Ty” [You are Trencin]—best practice of participatory planning in Slovak Republic. In: Finka M, Schoeffel J, Ondrejička V (eds) Participative planning in planning culture of Slovak Republic and Switzerland. IRAP, Raperswill, pp 41–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Petríková D, Ladzianska Z (2012) Social and cultural issues and participation in brownfield redevelopment. In: Petríková D, Vojvodíková B (eds) Brownfields—handbook BROWNTRANS. VŠB—Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava

    Google Scholar 

  • Poklembova V, Maco M, Ondrejicka V (2013) Ako spravovať priestor, o ktorý sa delíme? Teória commons a verejné priestory [How to manage the space we are sharing? The theory of Commons and public spaces]. URBION, Bratislava, pp 28–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeffel J et al (2014) Participative planning in planning culture of Slovak republic and Switzerland. 1.vyd. Rapperswil IRAP. Rapperswill

    Google Scholar 

  • Špaček M (2015) Multilevel governance for balanced development between core and peripheral spaces. České vysoké učení technické, Praha, pp 7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian (2012) David Cameron to unveil year-long relaxation of planning laws. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2012/sep/06/david-cameron-planning-laws-growth-plan. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2012/sep/06/david-cameron-planning-laws-growth-plan. Accessed 19 Feb 2018

  • Zajko M, Brighton D (2015) Conceptual frameworks for higher education institution and industry collaboration. In: Brighton D, Zajko M, Pezoldt K (eds) Successful innovations? Efficient knowledge and technology transfer and international collaboration. Universitätsverlag Ilmenau, Ilmenau

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milan Husár .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Husár, M., Finka, M., Jamečný, Ľ., Ondrejička, V. (2019). Innovations and Changing Role of Public Sector in Spatial Development Strategies: Problems and Challenges for Local and Regional Development in Central and Eastern European Countries After 2020. In: Finka, M., Jaššo, M., Husár, M. (eds) The Role of Public Sector in Local Economic and Territorial Development. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93575-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93575-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93574-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93575-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics