Skip to main content

Qualitative Research in Educational Leadership Studies: Issues in the Design and Conduct of Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complementary Research Methods for Educational Leadership and Policy Studies

Abstract

The study of educational leadership demands that researchers pay attention to specialized conceptual and empirical issues when designing and conducting qualitative studies that distinguish the field from other specializations in the social sciences. The threefold purpose of this chapter is to (a) further investigate the ways that research methods used to study educational leadership should be specialized due to conceptual and empirical dynamics, (b) explore the possibility of developing a signature research methodology for the study of educational leadership, and (c) to consider how sources of knowledge in educational leadership influence the ways that people make sense of their work as scholars and practitioners.

An earlier version of this chapter appeared as an article in the International Journal of Educational Management: Brooks, J. S. & Normore, A. N. (2015). Qualitative research and educational leadership: Essential dynamics to consider when designing and conducting studies. International Journal of Educational Management 29(7): 798–806. The work is reprinted here with permission of Emerald Publishing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aberbach, J. D., & Rockman, B. A. (2002). Conducting and coding elite interviews. PS: Political Science & Politics, 35(4), 673–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnhardt, R., Chilcott, J. H., & Wolcott, H. F. (1979). Anthropology and educational administration. Tucson: Impresora Sahuaro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Ally and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogotch, I., Beachum, F., Blount, J., Brooks, J. S., & English, F. W. (Eds.). (2008). Radicalizing educational leadership: Toward a theory of social justice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J. S. (2016). Everything we know about educational leadership is wrong. In G. Lakomski, C. Evers, & S. Eacott (Eds.), Questioning leadership: New directions for educational organizations (pp. 31–44). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J. S., & Miles, M. T. (2010). The social and cultural dynamics of school leadership: Classic concepts and cutting-edge possibilities. In S. D. Horsford (Ed.), New perspectives in educational leadership: Exploring social, political, and community contexts and meaning (pp. 7–28). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J. S., & Normore, A. N. (2015). Qualitative research and educational leadership: Essential dynamics to consider when designing and conducting studies. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(7), 798–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (1984). The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A question of method or epistemology? British Journal of Sociology, 35(1), 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capper, C. (1993). Educational administration in a pluralistic society: A multiparadigm approach. In C. Capper (Ed.), Educational administration in a pluralistic society (pp. 7–35). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eacott, S. (2015). Educational leadership relationally: A theory and methodology for educational leadership, management and administration. Australia: South Yarra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, N. G., & Lee, R. M. (1998). Computer analysis and qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204, 291–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grogan, M. (1999). Equity/equality issues of gender, race, and class. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(4), 518–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, W. S. (2010). Methodological approaches for interviewing elites. Geography Compass, 4(3), 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. New York: Suny Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig, M. I. (2006). New directions in education policy implementation. New York: Suny Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsford, S. (2011). Learning in a burning house: Educational inequality, ideology, and (dis)integration. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janesick, V. J. (1994). The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 209–219). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M. S. (2017). The practice of designing qualitative research on educational leadership. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 12(1), 26–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krefting, L. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), 214–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, M. S., Bryman, A., & Liao, T. F. (2004). The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lochmiller, C. R., & Hedges, S. L. (2017). Education policy implementation research: A call for new approaches. In J. N. Lester, C. R. Lochmiller, & R. E. Gabriel (Eds.), Discursive perspectives on education policy and implementation (pp. 17–40). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet, 358(9280), 483–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. (1984). Elites, bureaucrats, ostriches, and pussycats: Managing research in policy settings. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 15(3), 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 41). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1991). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhall, A. (2003). In the field: Notes on observation in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(3), 306–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Normore, A. H., & Brooks, J. S. (Eds.). (2014). Educational leadership for ethics and social justice: Views from the social sciences. Charlotte: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peshkin, A. (2000). The nature of interpretation in qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 29(9), 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponterotto, J. G., & Grieger, I. (2007). Effectively communicating qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(3), 404–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmons, J. (2016). Doing qualitative research online. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (Ed.). (2016). Qualitative research. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (2008). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 119–149). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. M. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theoharis, G. (2009). The school leaders our children deserve: Seven keys to equity, social justice, and school reform. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, S. J. (2012). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. F. (1970). An ethnographic approach to the study of school administrators. Human Organization, 29(2), 115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. F. (1973). The man in the principal’s office: An ethnography. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. F. (1974). The elementary school principal: Notes from a field study. In G. D. Spindler (Ed.), Education and cultural process: Toward an anthropology of education (pp. 176–201). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. F. (1977). Teachers versus technocrats: An educational innovation in anthropological perspective. Eugene: University of Oregon, Center for Educational Policy and Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. F. (1982). The anthropology of learning. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 8(2), 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. F. (2001). Writing up qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. F. (2002). Sneaky kid and its aftermath: Ethics and intimacy in fieldwork. Walnut Creek: Rowman Altamira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey S. Brooks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brooks, J.S., Normore, A.H. (2018). Qualitative Research in Educational Leadership Studies: Issues in the Design and Conduct of Studies. In: Lochmiller, C. (eds) Complementary Research Methods for Educational Leadership and Policy Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93539-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93539-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93538-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93539-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics