Abstract
The Consumer Stock Ownership Plan (CSOP) applies the future savings principle to the financing of new utilities in the energy sector. This technique, invented in the 1950s by the American lawyer and investment banker Louis O. Kelso, is especially applicable to financing public utilities on regulated markets so that they are owned by consumers rather than outside investors; due to guaranteed prices, investments in the sector involve lower risk and thus are easier to finance. CSOP financing is based on the following core principles: (1) the allocation of borrowed investment funds sequestered in a special vehicle with its own legal personality, that is, a trust or a similar intermediate company, invested in a business enterprise or equity interest on behalf of the individual plan participants, namely consumers, employees or citizens; (2) the repayment of the loan from future earnings of the credit-financed shares—the essence of every profitable investment—instead of savings from foregone consumption; (3) the securing of the loan by the investment entity, preferably backed by a state guarantee. Kelso first introduced the CSOP in 1958 in California’s Central Valley by enabling almost 5,000 local farmers to become owners of a fertilizer processing plant the Valley Nitrogen Producers, Inc., of which they were the primary consumers. The overall investment of USD 120 million (today an equivalent of a billion euros) was success; by 1978 Valley Nitrogen, Inc. had four manufacturing plants in California and one in Arizona. This chapter describes the legal structure of the CSOP, together with a case study of the first 1958 pilot CSOP.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Regarding the plan participants the ESOP limited to the employees of the company is narrower while the GSOP involving citizens of a geographical region is wider.
- 2.
This structure is generally appropriate for countries without Common Law tradition.
- 3.
Of the initial capital of EUR 25,000, only 50 percent, that is, EUR 12,500, actually need to be actually paid down.
- 4.
Direct shareholding in German limited liability companies has the disadvantage that the transfer of shareholders’ positions follows a formal procedure, that is, a notary’s acknowledgment of execution, which in turn increases transaction cost for the tradability of the shares.
- 5.
This structure is a standard solution in Germany tested many times by so-called public companies (“Publikumsgesellschaften”) in real estate investments, who face a similar problem: A very large number of investors is intended to participate in the equity of a company where every change in ownership, whether it be due to death, sale of shares or seizure, has to be signed into the commercial register following the relevant formal procedures.
- 6.
Thus double taxation in general is avoided, and the CSOP-Operating LLC generates a tax shield for the consumer-shareholders, which, however, has only limited benefits here. Nevertheless, the benefits of the first scenario, that is, to accelerate principal payments, can be achieved by a debt pushdown through a merger of the CSOP-Operating LLC with the target utility.
- 7.
“Aktuelle Daten und Fakten—Erneuerbare Energien”, http://www.unendlich-viel-energie.de/de/wirtschaftlaktuelle-daten-und-fakten.html, [login 3.04.2013].
- 8.
“Erneuerbare Energien—ein neues Zeitalter hat begonnen”, http://www.bundesregierung.de/Webs/Breg/DE/Themen/Energiekonzept/Energieversorgung/ErneuerbareEnergien-Zeitalter/_node.html, [login 3.04.2013].
- 9.
However, even some energy cooperatives lack the local reference, an example in Germany being Greenpeace Energy, where 110,715 electricity customers, 9280 gas customers and 22,841 members are involved.
- 10.
In particular municipal law typically stipulates four main prerequisites for participation of municipalities in RE projects, that is, public purpose, capacities for the investment, subsidiarity and appropriate representation.
References
Ashford, R. A. H. (1994). The binary economics of Louis Kelso: A democratic private property system for growth and justice. In J. H. Miller (Hrsg.), Curing world poverty: The new role of property, social justice review (pp. 101–102).
BVerfGE. (1993). Rulings of the German Federal Constitutional Court, case of 26 May 1993 concerning the possession of rented apartments, BVerfGE, Vol. 89, p. 1ff, esp. p. 6; see compare also BVerfGE, Vol. 24, p. 267ff, esp. 389; Vol. 50, p. 290ff, esp. 339; Vol. 53, p. 257ff, esp. 289.
ESOP Association. (n.d.). ESOP statistics. Retrieved May 5, 2017, from http://www.esopassociation.org/medialmedia_statistics.asp.
Gauche, J. N. (2000). Binary economic models for the privatization of public assets. Journal of Socio-Economics, 8. Retrieved April 10, 2013, from http://www.kelsoinstitute.org/pdflbinaryeconomicmodes.pdf.
Herbes, C., Brummer, V., Rognli, J., Blazejewski, S., & Gericke, N. (2017). Responding to policy change: New business models for renewable energy cooperatives–barriers perceived by cooperatives’ members. Energy Policy, 109, 82–95.
Holstenkamp, L., Centgraf, S., Dorniok, D., Kahla, F., Masson, T., Müller, J. R., Radtke, J., & Yildiz, Ö. (2017). Bürgerenergiegesellschaften in Deutschland. In L. Holstenkamp & J. Radtke (Eds.), Handbuch Energiewende und Partizipation (pp. 1057–1076). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Kelso, L. O. (1989, October/November/December). Why I invented the ESOP LBO. Leaders, 12(4).
Kelso Institute. (1976, November 8). Documentation. Valley Nitrogen Producers, Inc.
Kogdenko, N. (2013). Public acceptance: Why does it frequently become a ‘show stopper’? EDI Quarterly, 4(4), 16–17.
Lowitzsch, J. (2017). Community participation and sustainable investment in city projects: The Berlin water consumer stock ownership plan. Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal, 10(2), 138–151.
Lowitzsch, J., & Goebel, K. (2013). Vom Verbraucher zum Energieproduzenten. Finanzierung dezentraler Energieproduktion unter Beteiligung der Bürgern mittels sog. Consumer Stock Ownership Plans, Zeitschrift für neues Energierecht, Heft 3, 237–244.
Lowitzsch, J., Kudert, S., & Neusel, T. (2012). Legal opinion on the German trust model. Viadrina working paper.
Mühlenhoff, J. (2011, September). Kosten und Preise für Strom Fossile, Atomstrom und Erneuerbare Energien im Vergleich, Hintergrundinformation der Agentur für Erneuerbare Energien Renews Spezial Ausgabe 52 I.
NCEO. (n.d.). NCEO statistics. Retrieved May 5, 2017, from http://www.nceo.org/articles/esops-by-the-numbers.
Pendleton, A., & Robinson, A. (2010). Employee stock ownership, involvement, and productivity: An interaction-based approach. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 64(1), 3–29.
Puka, L., & Szulecki, K. (2014). Beyond the “Grid-Lock” in electricity interconnectors. DIW Discussion Papers 1378, p. 12 ff 4.3. Why financing is not a major impediment.
Röttgen, N. (2013). Energiewende schafft neue Chancen auf dem Arbeitsmarkt, March 26, 2012. Retrieved April 11, 2013, from http://www.bmu.de/bmu/presse-reden/pressemitteilungen/pm/artikel/erneuerbare-energien-geben-in-deutschland-bereits-mehr-als-380000-menschen-arbeit/.
Stockton’s Port Soundings. (1978, June). Valley Nitrogen Names Lindley, 1(7).
trend:research/Leuphana Universität Lüneburg. (2017). Definition und Marktanalyse von Bürgerenergie in Deutschland (Studie im Auftrag der Initiative “Die Wende—Energie in Bürgerhand” und der Agentur für Erneuerbare Energien). Bremen and Lüneburg: trend:research and Leuphana Universität Lüneburg.
Valley Nitrogen Producers Inc. (1969). Announcement of the chairman of the Valley Nitrogen Producers Inc. Carl H. Hass to the stakeholders on 27, June.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lowitzsch, J. (2019). The CSOP-Financing Technique: Origins, Legal Concept and Implementation. In: Lowitzsch, J. (eds) Energy Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93518-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93518-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93517-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93518-8
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)