Advertisement

Consumer (Co-)Ownership in Renewables in Germany

  • Özgür YildizEmail author
  • Boris Gotchev
  • Lars Holstenkamp
  • Jakob R. Müller
  • Jörg Radtke
  • Laura Welle
Chapter

Abstract

The German legislator has made the “…preservation of the diversity of actors…” an explicit policy goal introduced since the 2014 recast of the Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG). Furthermore, sec. 3 no 15 of the 2016/17 recast of the EEG defines citizen energy companies as consisting of at least ten natural persons who are members eligible to vote or in which at least 51 per cent of the voting rights are held by natural persons with a permanent residency in the administrative district of the project location, and where no member or shareholder of the undertaking holds more than 10 per cent of the voting rights. Other measures at the national and the federal states level exist to support citizen energy. Finally, consumer (co-)ownership received explicit recognition of its crucial role in the 2018 recast of the Renewable Energy Directive (RED II) as part of the Clean Energy Package. As of today, RE consumer (co-)ownership comes mainly in two forms: individual ownership and/or leasing arrangements, especially for small PV or battery storage projects, but also for heat pumps, with self-sufficiency being a major motivation as the legal framework is shifting away from guaranteed feed-in tariffs; and collective investments differing with regard to motivation and organizational form. Three legal structures have become “standards” for collective investments in the German RE sector, namely (i) civil law partnerships in use mainly for small PV installations, (ii) limited partnerships with a limited liability company as a general partner common for medium- to large-scale projects, especially in wind energy, and (iii) energy cooperatives whose number has increased significantly in the past, especially in the period 2008—2012.

References

  1. AGEB. (2017). Energieverbrauch in Deutschland im Jahr 2016. Berlin: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Energiebilanzen e. V. (AGEB), 2016.Google Scholar
  2. Bioenergiedorf Jühnde. (2017). Bioenergiedorf Jühnde—Home. Retrieved from http://www.bioenergiedorf.de/home.html.
  3. BMWi. (2016). Fünfter Monitoring-Bericht zur Energiewende—Die Energie der Zukunft (Berichtsjahr 2015). Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi).Google Scholar
  4. BMWi. (2017). Energiedaten: Gesamtausgabe—Stand: Mai 2017. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi).Google Scholar
  5. Brummer, V. (2018). Of expertise, social capital, and democracy: Assessing the organizational governance and decision-making in German renewable energy cooperatives. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christoph, D. (2014). Die Stiftungslösung als Bürgerbeteiligungsmodell für EE-Projekte. In H. Degenhart & T. Schomerus (Eds.), Lüneburger Schriften zum Wirtschaftsrecht: Vol. 27. Recht und Finanzierung von Erneuerbaren Energien. Bürgerbeteiligungsmodelle (pp. 33–46). Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Enzensberger, N., Fichtner, W., & Rentz, O. (2003a). Financing renewable energy projects via closed-end funds: A German case study. Renewable Energy, 28(13), 2023–2036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Enzensberger, N., Fichtner, W., & Rentz, O. (2003b). Evolution of local citizen participation schemes in the German wind market. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 20(2), 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. EUROSTAT. (2017). Sustainable development in the European Union—Monitoring report on progress towards the SDGs in an EU context (2017 edition). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  10. EWS. (2017). Elektrizitätswerke Schönau—Die Geschichte der EWS. Retrieved from https://www.ews-schoenau.de/ews/geschichte/.
  11. Gotchev, B. (2016). Bundesländer als Motor einer bürgernahen Energiewende? Stand und Perspektiven wirtschaftlicher Bürgerbeteiligung bei Windenergie an Land. IASS Working Paper—December 2016, Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS), Potsdam.Google Scholar
  12. Großklos, M., Behr, I., & Paschka, D. (2016). Möglichkeiten der Wohnungswirtschaft zum Einstieg in die Erzeugung und Vermarktung elektrischer Energie. Abschlussbericht. Forschungsinitiative Zukunft Bau: F 2985. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Haas, T. (2017). Energiearmut als neues Konfliktfeld in der Stromwende. In Energie und soziale Ungleichheit (pp. 377–402). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, S., Foxon, T. J., & Bolton, R. (2016). Financing the civic energy sector: How financial institutions affect ownership models in Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 12, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henning, H. M., & Palzer, A. (2014). A comprehensive model for the German electricity and heat sector in a future energy system with a dominant contribution from renewable energy technologies—Part I: Methodology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 1003–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herbes, C., Brummer, V., Rognli, J., Blazejewski, S., & Gericke, N. (2017). Responding to policy change: New business models for renewable energy cooperatives? Barriers perceived by cooperatives members. Energy Policy, 109, 82–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holstenkamp, L. (2014). Local investment schemes for renewable energy: A financial perspective. In M. Peeters & T. Schomerus (Eds.), Renewable energy law in the EU. Legal perspectives on bottom-up approaches (pp. 232–255). Cheltenham and Cheltenham [u.a.]: Edward Elgar Publishing and Elgar.Google Scholar
  18. Holstenkamp, L., Centgraf, S., Dorniok, D., Kahla, F., Masson, T., Müller, J. R., Radtke, J., & Yildiz, Ö. (2017). Bürgerenergiegesellschaften in Deutschland. In L. Holstenkamp & J. Radtke (Eds.), Handbuch Energiewende und Partizipation (pp. 1057–1076). Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Holstenkamp, L., & Kahla, F. (2016). What are community energy companies trying to accomplish?: An empirical investigation of investment motives in the German case. Energy Policy, 97, 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kahla, F., Holstenkamp, L., Müller, J. R., & Degenhart, H. (2017). Entwicklung und Stand von Bürgerenergiegesellschaften und Energiegenossenschaften in Deutschland. Lüneburg: Leuphana University Lüneburg.Google Scholar
  21. Knoefel, J., Sagebiel, J., Yildiz, Ö., Müller, J. R., & Rommel, J. (2018). A consumer perspective on corporate governance in the energy transition: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Germany. Energy Economics (Article in press).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leipprand, A., & Flachsland, C. (2018). Regime destabilization in energy transitions: The German debate on the future of coal. Energy Research & Social Science, 40, 190–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lowitzsch, J., & Goebel, K. (2013). Vom Verbraucher zum Energieproduzenten. Finanzierung dezentraler Energieproduktion unter Beteiligung von Bürgern als Konsumenten mittels Consumer Stock Ownership Plans (CSOPs). Zeitschrift für Neues Energierecht, 17(3), 237–244.Google Scholar
  24. Maly, C., Meister, M., & Schomerus, T. (2014). EEG 2014: Das Ende der Bürgerenergie? Energierecht: ER Zeitschrift für die gesamte Energierechtspraxis, 3(4), 147–154.Google Scholar
  25. Mendonça, M., Lacey, S., & Hvelplund, F. (2009). Stability, participation and transparency in renewable energy policy: Lessons from Denmark and the United States. Policy and Society, 27(4), 379–398.Google Scholar
  26. Müller, J. R., Dorniok, D., Flieger, B., Holstenkamp, L., Mey, F., & Radtke, J. (2015). Energiegenossenschaften in Deutschland: Ein Modell mit Zukunft?: Beobachtungen, Erklärungen, Prognosen. Gaia: Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 24(2), 96–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pye, S., Dobbins, A., Baffert, C., Brajković, J., Grgurev, I., De Miglio, R., et al. (2015). Energy poverty and vulnerable consumers in the energy sector across the EU: Analysis of policies and measures. Stockholm: INSIGHT_E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Radtke. (2016). Energiewende in der Verflechtungsfalle: Chancen und Grenzen von Partizipation und bürgerschaftlichem Engagement in der Energiewende. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 85(4), 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reusswig, F., Braun, F., Heger, I., Ludewig, T., Eichenauer, E., & Lass, W. (2016). Against the wind: Local opposition to the German energiewende. Utilities Policy, 41, 214–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rommel, J., Radtke, J., von Jorck, G., Mey, F., & Yildiz, Ö. (2018). Community renewable energy at a crossroads: A think piece on degrowth, technology, and the democratization of the German energy system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197 (Part 2), 1746–1753.Google Scholar
  31. Roth, L., Lowitzsch, J., Yildiz, Ö., & Hashani, A. (2018). Does (Co-) ownership in renewables matter for an electricity consumer’s demand flexibility? Empirical evidence from Germany. Energy Research & Social Science, 46, 169–182.Google Scholar
  32. Schmid, E., Pechan, A., Mehnert, M., & Eisenack, K. (2017). Imagine all these futures: On heterogeneous preferences and mental models in the German energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 27, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sütterlin, B., & Siegrist, M. (2017). Public acceptance of renewable energy technologies from an abstract versus concrete perspective and the positive imagery of solar power. Energy Policy, 106, 356–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. trend:research. (2017). Eigentümerstruktur: Erneuerbare Energien—Entwicklung der Akteursvielfalt, Rolle der Energieversorger, Ausblick bis 2020. Bremen: trend:research.Google Scholar
  35. Umweltbundesamt. (2017). Erneuerbare Energien in Deutschland—Daten zur Entwicklung im Jahr 2016. Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt (UBA).Google Scholar
  36. Welsch, H., & Biermann, P. (2014). Fukushima and the preference for nuclear power in Europe: Evidence from subjective well-being data. Ecological Economics, 108, 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Will, H., & Zuber, F. (2016). Geschäftsmodelle mit PV-Mieterstrom: PV financing project, deliverable 4.1. München, Berlin. Retrieved from Bundesverband Solarwirtschaft website. Retrieved from https://www.pv-mieterstrom.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/PV_Financing_Mieterstrom.pdf.
  38. Yildiz, Ö., Rommel, J., Debor, S., Holstenkamp, L., Mey, F., Müller, J. R., et al. (2015). Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators?: Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science, 6, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yildiz, Ö. (2014). Financing renewable energy infrastructures via financial citizen participation—The case of Germany. Renewable Energy, 68, 677–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yildiz, Ö., & Radtke, J. (2015). Energy cooperatives as a form of workplace democracy? A theoretical assessment. Economic Sociology: The European Electronic Newsletter, 16(3), 17–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Özgür Yildiz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Boris Gotchev
    • 2
  • Lars Holstenkamp
    • 3
  • Jakob R. Müller
    • 4
  • Jörg Radtke
    • 5
  • Laura Welle
    • 3
  1. 1.inter 3 Institut für RessourcenmanagementBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS)PotsdamGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Finance and AccountingLeuphana University of LüneburgLüneburgGermany
  4. 4.Lehrstuhl für Organisation und ManagementUniversität ErfurtErfurtGermany
  5. 5.Fakultät 1 / PolitikwissenschaftUniversität SiegenSiegenGermany

Personalised recommendations