Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook on the Neuropsychology of Aging and Dementia

Part of the book series: Clinical Handbooks in Neuropsychology ((CHNEURO))

  • 4678 Accesses

Abstract

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is characterized by the clinical triad of gait disturbance, cognitive dysfunction, and urinary symptoms, observed in the context of enlargement of the cerebral ventricular system. Mean age of onset is approximately 60 years, which complicates the diagnosis since there is the potential for multiple age-related comorbidities in this population. Typically, gait disturbance is the presenting symptom that brings an individual to medical attention, but cognitive decline can be the initial symptom in some cases. NPH is an important diagnostic entity for the neuropsychologist working with older adults to be familiar with, since it is one of the few progressive cognitive disturbances that can be effectively treated. The current standard of care treatment is placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, which can lead to reversal of symptoms, but shunt surgery is not without complications, and careful patient selection is prudent. The neuropsychologist can be a key contributor in clinical settings for diagnostic considerations and in the evaluation of treatment response. In this chapter, we present a discussion of the clinical presentation and characteristic features of iNPH, explore recent evidence-based diagnostic criteria, and provide guidelines for neuropsychological evaluation of iNPH. A case example documenting post-shunt recovery of function is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, et al. Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: prediction of outcome after shunting by resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:687–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, et al. Dutch Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus Study: the role of cerebrovascular disease. J Neurosurg. 1999;90:221–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ravdin LD, Katzen HL. Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. In: Morgan JE, Baron IS, Ricker JH, editors. Casebook of clinical neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher CM. Hydrocephalus as a cause of disturbances of gait in the elderly. Neurology. 1982;32:1358–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Knutsson E, Lying-Tunell U. Gait apraxia in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: patterns of movement and muscle activation. Neurology. 1985;35:155–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986;34:119–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mathias S, Nayak US, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: the “Get-up and go” test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67:387–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Campos-Juanatey F, Gutierrez-Baños JL, Portillo-Martin JA, Zubillaga-Guerrer S. Assessment of the urodynamic diagnosis in patients with urinary incontinence associated with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(5):465–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Avery K, Donovan J, Peters T, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(4):322–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coyne K, Revicki D, Hunt T, Corey R, Stewart W, Bentkover J, et al. Psychometric validation of an overactive bladder symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire: The OAB-q. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:563–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cardozo L, Staskin D, Currie B, et al. Validation of a bladder symptom screening tool in women with incontinence due to overactive bladder. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(12):1655–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2417-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Iddon JL, Pickard JD, Cross JJ, Griffiths PD, Czosnyka M, Sahakian BJ. Specific patterns of cognitive impairment in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer’s disease: a pilot study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;67:723–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Casmiro M, D’Alessandro R, Cacciatore FM, Daidone R, Calbucci F, Lugaresi E. Risk factors for the syndrome of ventricular enlargement with gait apraxia (idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus): a case-control study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989;52:847–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Caltagirone C, Gainotti G, Masullo C, Villa G. Neurophysiological study of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1982;65:93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Klinge P, Berding G, Brinker T, Schuhmann M, Knapp WH, Samii M. PET-studies in idiopathic chronic hydrocephalus before and after shunt-treatment: the role of risk factors for cerebrovascular disease (CVD) on cerebral hemodynamics. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2002;81:43–5.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Merten T. Neuropsychology of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Nervenarzt. 1999;70:496–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thomsen AM, Borgesen SE, Bruhn P, Gjerris F. Prognosis of dementia in normal-pressure hydrocephalus after a shunt operation. Ann Neurol. 1986;20:304–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bugalho P, Alves L, Miguel R, Ribeiro O. Profile of cognitive dysfunction and relation with gait disturbance in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;118:83–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saito M, Nishio Y, Kanno S, et al. Cognitive profile of idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2011;1(1):202–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kito Y, Kazui H, Kubo Y, Yoshida T, Takaya M, Wada T, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Behav Neurol. 2009;21:165–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Crowell RM, Tew JM Jr, Mark VH. Aggressive dementia associated with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Report of two unusual cases. Neurology. 1973;23:461–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McIntyre AW, Emsley RA. Shoplifting associated with normal-pressure hydrocephalus: report of a case. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1990;3:229–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosen H, Swigar ME. Depression and normal pressure hydrocephalus. A dilemma in neuropsychiatric differential diagnosis. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1976;163:35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schneider U, Malmadier A, Dengler R, Sollmann WP, Emrich HM. Mood cycles associated with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153:1366–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lying-Tunell U. Psychotic symptoms in normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1979;59:415–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pinner G, Johnson H, Bouman WP, Isaacs J. Psychiatric manifestations of normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a short review and unusual case. Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9:465–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Abbruzzese M, Scarone S, Colombo C. Obsessive-compulsive symptomatology in normal pressure hydrocephalus: a case report. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 1994;19:378–80.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kanemoto H, Kazui H, Suzuki Y, Sato S, Kishima H, Yoshimine T, Yoshiyama K. Effect of lumbo-peritoneal shunt surgery on neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Sci. 2016;361:206–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mori K. Management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a multiinstitutional study conducted in Japan. J Neurosurg. 2001;95:970–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Casmiro M, Benassi G, Cacciatore FM, D’Alessandro R. Frequency of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Arch Neurol. 1989;46:608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Trenkwalder C, Schwarz J, Gebhard J, et al. Starnberg trial on epidemiology of Parkinsonism and hypertension in the elderly. Prevalence of Parkinson’s disease and related disorders assessed by a door-to-door survey of inhabitants older than 65 years. Arch Neurol. 1995;52:1017–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Conn H. Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH): more about NPH by a physician who is the patient. Clin Med. 2010;10:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kuriyama N, Miyajima M, Nakajima M, et al. Nationwide hospital-based survey of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in Japan: Epidemiological and clinical characteristics. Brain Behav. 2017;7(3):e00635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lemcke J, Stengel D, Stockhammer F, Güthoff C, Rohde V, Meier U. Nationwide Incidence of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) Assessed by Insurance Claim Data in Germany. Open Neurol J. 2016;10:15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Marmarou A, Bergsneider M, Relkin N, Klinge P, Black PM. Development of guidelines for idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: introduction. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:S1–3. discussion ii-v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Relkin N, Hamilton M, Katzen H, Williams M, Bach T, Zuspan S, Holubkov R. A comparison of four etiologic subtypes of adult hydrocephalus from the AHCRN patient registry. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2017;14(Suppl 1):A53.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Greitz D, Hannerz J, Rahn T, Bolander H, Ericsson A. MR imaging of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in health and disease. On the vascular pathogenesis of communicating hydrocephalus and benign intracranial hypertension. Acta Radiol. 1994;35:204–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sklar FH, Diehl JT, Beyer CW Jr, Clark WK. Brain elasticity changes with ventriculomegaly. J Neurosurg. 1980;53:173–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bradley WG Jr, Whittemore AR, Watanabe AS, Davis SJ, Teresi LM, Homyak M. Association of deep white matter infarction with chronic communicating hydrocephalus: implications regarding the possible origin of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;12:31–9.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tullberg M, Hultin L, Ekholm S, Mansson JE, Fredman P, Wikkelso C. White matter changes in normal pressure hydrocephalus and Binswanger disease: specificity, predictive value and correlations to axonal degeneration and demyelination. Acta Neurol Scand. 2002;105:417–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a Brief Screening Tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Relkin N, Marmarou A, Klinge P, Bergsneider M, Black PM. Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:S4–16. discussion ii-v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mori E, Ishikawa M, Kato T, et al. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition. Neurol Med Chir. 2012;52:775–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Evans WA. An encephalographic ratio for estimating ventricular enlargement and cerebral atrophy. Arch Neurol Psychiatr. 1937;93:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Williams MA, Razumovsky AY, Hanley DF. Evaluation of shunt function in patients who are never better, or better than worse after shunt surgery for NPH. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1998;71:368–70.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Marmarou A, Bergsneider M, Klinge P, Relkin N, Black PM. The value of supplemental prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:S17–28. discussion ii-v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Allali G, Laidet M, Armand S, Momjian S, Marques B, Saj A, Assal F. A combined cognitive and gait quantification to identify normal pressure hydrocephalus from its mimics: The Geneva’s protocol. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017;160:5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Vanneste JA. Three decades of normal pressure hydrocephalus: are we wiser now? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57:1021–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Malm J, Kristensen B, Karlsson T, Fagerlund M, Elfverson J, Ekstedt J. The predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid dynamic tests in patients with th idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. Arch Neurol. 1995;52:783–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Bret P, Chazal J, Janny P, et al. Chronic hydrocephalus in adults. Neurochirurgie. 1990;36(Suppl 1):1–159.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Klinge P, Marmarou A, Bergsneider M, Relkin N, Black PM. Outcome of shunting in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus and the value of outcome assessment in shunted patients. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:S40–52. discussion ii-v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kiefer M, Meier U, Eymann R. Does idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus always mean a poor prognosis? Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2010;106:101–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Vanneste J, Augustijn P, Dirven C, Tan WF, Goedhart ZD. Shunting normal-pressure hydrocephalus: do the benefits outweigh the risks? A multicenter study and literature review. Neurology. 1992;42:54–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wilson RK, Williams MA. The role of the neurologist in the longitudinal management of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurologist. 2010;16:238–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kazui H, Mori E, Ohkawa S, Okada T, Kondo T, Sakakibura R. Takeda M. Predictors of the disappearance of triad symptoms in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus after shunt surgery. J Neurol Sci. 2013;328(1–2):64–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Black PM. Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Results of shunting in 62 patients. J Neurosurg. 1980;52:371–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Hebb AO, Cusimano MD. Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review of diagnosis and outcome. Neurosurgery. 2001;49:1166–84. discussion 84–6

    Google Scholar 

  58. Raftopoulos C, Deleval J, Chaskis C, et al. Cognitive recovery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective study. Neurosurgery. 1994;35:397–404. discussion -5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Thomas G, McGirt MJ, Woodworth G, et al. Baseline neuropsychological profile and cognitive response to cerebrospinal fluid shunting for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2005;20:163–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Hellstrom P, Edsbagge M, Blomsterwall E, et al. Neuropsychological effects of shunt treatment in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:527–35. discussion 535-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Katzen H, Ravdin LD, Assuras S, Heros R, Kaplitt M, Schwartz TH, Fink M, Levin BE, Relkin NR. Post-shunt cognitive and functional improvement in idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (iNPH). Neurosurgery. 2011;68(2):416–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Petersen J, Hellström P, Wikkelsø C, Lundgren-Nilsson Å. Improvement in social function and health-related quality of life after shunt surgery for idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(4):776–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:922–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. McAllister JP 2nd, Williams MA, Walker ML, Kestle JR, Relkin NR, Anderson AM, et al. An update on research priorities in hydrocephalus: overview of the third National Institutes of Health-sponsored symposium Opportunities for Hydrocephalus Research: Pathways to Better Outcomes. J Neurosurg. 2015;123(6):1427–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Mattis S. Dementia Rating Scale: professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Teng EL, Chui HC. The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. J Clin Psychiatry. 1987;48:314–8.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Goodglass H, Kaplan E. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Spreen O, Benton AL. Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia (NCCEA). Victoria: University of Victoria; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Benedict RHB, Schretlen D, Groninger L, Brandt J. Hopkins verbal learning test-revised: normative data and analysis of inter-form and test-retest reliability. Clin Neuropsychol. 1998;12:43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Wechsler D. WAIS–IV administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Reitan RM, Wolfson D. The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery. Tucson: Neuropsychological Press; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Smith A. Symbol digit modalities test manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Klinge P, Rückert N, Weißenborn K, Dörner L, Samii M, Brinker T. A practical neuropsychological test battery for measurement of cognitive and motor function in patients with Normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). Poster at the 3rd international hydrocephalus workshop. Kos: Greece; 17–20 May 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Tsakanikas D, Katzen H, Ravdin LD, Relkin NR. Upper extremity motor measures of Tap Test response in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2009;111:752–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Klinge P, Ruckert N, Schuhmann M, Dorner L, Brinker T, Samii M. Neuropsychological testing to improve surgical management of patients with chronic hydrocephalus after shunt treatment. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2002;81:51–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Rossetti M, Piryatinsky I, Ahmed F, Klinge P, Relkin N, Salloway S. Katzen H. Two Novel Psychomotor Tasks in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016;22(3):341–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Katzen H, Relkin N. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: a review. In: Geldmacher D, editor. Other dementias. Delray Beach: Carma Publishing; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA

    Lisa D. Ravdin & Melanie Lucas

  2. Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA

    Melanie Lucas

  3. Division of Neuropsychology, Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA

    Heather L. Katzen

Authors
  1. Lisa D. Ravdin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Melanie Lucas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Heather L. Katzen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa D. Ravdin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA

    Lisa D. Ravdin

  2. Department of Neurology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA

    Heather L. Katzen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ravdin, L.D., Lucas, M., Katzen, H.L. (2019). Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. In: Ravdin, L.D., Katzen, H.L. (eds) Handbook on the Neuropsychology of Aging and Dementia. Clinical Handbooks in Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93497-6_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation