Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Capacity Evaluations in Older Adults: Neuropsychological Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook on the Neuropsychology of Aging and Dementia

Part of the book series: Clinical Handbooks in Neuropsychology ((CHNEURO))

Abstract

Aging necessarily brings with it changes in one’s functional abilities, and this often occurs in the setting of declining cognition. Changes in mental capacities may be subtle, even almost imperceptible, or they may be so glaringly apparent that no one can deny their presence. Older adults with cognitive decline are clearly vulnerable, and this places them at greater risk for abuse and exploitation. Neuropsychologists are becomingly increasingly called upon to consult about such mental capacities in the elderly, to provide opinions to families and courts of law regarding one’s abilities to care for themselves as well as make decisions about their health care, finances, and other important matters. In this chapter we discuss the role of the neuropsychologist in such capacity evaluations and provide an assessment framework for professionals who may be new to this interesting aspect of practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Marson DC, Huthwaite J, Hebert T. Testamentary capacity and undue influence in the elderly: a jurisprudent therapy perspective. Law Psychol Rev. 2004;28:71–96.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaufmann PM. Cases, controversies, and legal authority in neuropsychological practice. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23(4):556. [CE Workshop presented at the 7th Annual AACN Conference, San Diego, CA.]

    Google Scholar 

  3. Greiffenstein MF. Basics of forensic neuropsychology. In: Morgan JE, Ricker JH, editors. Textbook of clinical neuropsychology. New York: Psychology Press; 2008. p. 905–41.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marcopulos BA, Morgan JE, Denney RL. Neuropsychological evaluation of competency to proceed. In: Denney RL, Sullivan JP, editors. Clinical neuropsychology in the criminal forensic setting. New York: Guilford Press; 2008. p. 176–203.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marson DC. Loss of financial capacity in dementia: conceptual and empirical approaches. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2001;8:164–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Greiffenstein MF. Testamentary competence: antemortem and postmortem neuropsychological analysis. Newsletter. 2003;40(21):7–36.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Melton GB, Petrila J, Poythress NG, Slobogin C. Psychological evaluations for the courts: a handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grisso T. Evaluating competencies: forensic assessments and instruments. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Science; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heilbronner RL, Sweet JJ, Morgan JE, Larrabee GJ, Millis SR. American Academy of clinical neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23:1093–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. American Bar Association and American Psychological Association Assessment of Capacity in Older Adults Project Working Group. Assessment of older adults with diminished capacity: a handbook for psychologists. Washington, DC: American Bar Association and American Psychological Association; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moye J, Braun M. Assessment of capacity. In: Lichtenberg PA, editor. Handbook of assessment in clinical gerontology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2010. p. 581–618.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Engel L, Bar Y, Beaton DE, Green RE, Dawson DR. Identifying instruments to quantify financial management skills in adults with acquired cognitive impairment. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016;38:76–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerstenecker A, Eakin A, Trebel K, Martin R, Swenson-Dravis D, Petersen R, Marson D. Age and education corrected older adult normative data for a short form version of the financial capacity instrument. Psychol Assess. 2016;28:737–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lichtenberg PA, Flicker LJ, Rahman-Filipiak A. Financial decision-making abilities and financial exploitation in older African Americans: preliminary validity evidence for the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale (LFDRS). J Elder Abuse Negl. 2016;28:14–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rabin LA, Borgos MJ, Saykin AJ. A survey of neuropsychologists’ practices and perspectives regarding the assessment of judgment ability. Appl Neuropsychol. 2008;15:264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. MacDougall EE, Mansbach WE. The judgment test of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (NAB): psychometric considerations in an assisted-living sample. Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;27:827–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shulman KI, Cohen CA, Hull I. Psychiatric issues in retrospective challenges of testamentary capacity. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;20:63–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shulman KI, Cohen CA, Kirsh FC, Hull IA, Champine JD. Assessment of testamentary capacity and vulnerability to undue influence. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:722–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moye J, Marson DC. Assessment of decision-making capacity in older adults: an emerging area of practice and research. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007;62:3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hullinger R, Puglielli L. Molecular and cellular aspects of age-related cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease. Behav Brain Res. 2017;322:191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith GE, Bondi MW. Normal aging, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. In: Morgan JE, Ricker JH, editors. Textbook of clinical neuropsychology. New York: Psychology Press; 2008. p. 768–80.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith G, Rush BK. Normal aging and mild cognitive impairment. In: Attix DK, Welsh-Bohmer KA, editors. Geriatric neuropsychology: assessment and intervention. New York: Guilford Press; 2006. p. 27–55.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Caccappolo-Van Vliet E, Manly J, Tang MX, Marder K, Bell K, Stern Y. The neuropsychological profiles of mild Alzheimer’s disease and questionable dementia as compared to age-related cognitive decline. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003;9:720–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Lucas J. Assessment techniques: tests, test batteries, norms and methodological approaches. In: Morgan JE, Ricker JH, editors. Textbook of clinical neuropsychology. New York: Psychology Press; 2008. p. 38–57.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ivnik RJ, Malec JF, Smith GE, Tangalos EG, Petersen RC, Kokmen E, et al. Mayo’s older American normative studies: WAIS-R, WMS-R, and AVLT norms for ages 56 through 97. Clin Neuropsychol. 1992;6(Suppl):1–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Heaton R, Grant I, Matthews C. Comprehensive norm s for an expanded Halstead reitan neuropsychological battery: demographic corrections, research findings, and clinical applications. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Flicker C, Ferris SH, Reisberg B. Mild cognitive impairment in the elderly: predictors of dementia. Neurology. 1991;41:1006–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring S, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:303–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Peterson RC, Caracciolo B, Brayne C, Gauthier S, Jelic V, Fratiglioni L. Mild cognitive impairment: a concept in evolution. J Intern Med. 2014;275:214–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Andrikopoulos J. Looking into the crystal ball of mild cognitive impairment: what I see is Alzheimer’s disease. In: Morgan JE, Baron IS, Ricker JH, editors. Casebook of clinical neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 540–59.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Whitehouse P, Brodaty H. Mild cognitive impairment. Lancet. 2006;17:367.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Welsh-Bohmer KA, Warren LH. Neurodegenerative dementias. In: Attix DK, Welsh-Bohmer KA, editors. Geriatric neuropsychology: assessment and intervention. New York: Guilford Press; 2006. p. 56–88.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Haaland KA, Swanda RM. Vascular dementia. In: Morgan JE, Ricker JH, editors. Textbook of clinical neuropsychology. New York: Psychology Press; 2008. p. 384–91.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Welsh-Bohmer KA, Attix DK. Neuropsychological assessment of late-life cognitive disorders. In: Steffens DC, Blazer DG, Thakur MA, editors. The American psychiatric publishing textbook of geriatric psychiatry. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2015. p. 142–4.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological assessment. 4th ed. New York: Oxford; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Alzheimer’s Association. Alzheimer’s Association report: 2017 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13:325–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gurrera RJ, Moye J, Karel MJ, Azar AR, Armesto JC. Cognitive performance predicts treatment decisional abilities in mild to moderate dementia. Neurology. 2006;66:1367–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Marson DC, Cody HA, Ingram KK, Harrell LE. Neuropsychological predictors of competency in Alzheimer’s disease using a rational reasons legal standard. Arch Neurol. 1995;52:955–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Marson DC, Chatterjee A, Ingram KK, Harrell LE. Toward a neurologic model of competency: cognitive predictors of capacity to consent in Alzheimer’s disease using three different legal standards. Neurology. 1996;46:666–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Marson DC, Sawrie SM, McInturff B, Snyder S, Chatterjee A, Stalvey T, et al. Assessing financial capacity in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a conceptual model and prototype instrument. Arch Neurol. 2000;57:877–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Okonkwo OC, Griffith HR, Belue K, Lanza S, Zamrini EY, Harrell LE, Brockington JC, Clark D, Raman R, Marson DC. Cognitive models of medical decision-making capacity in patients with mild cognitive impairment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008;14:297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wettstein RM, Roth LH. The psychiatrist as legal guardian. Am J Psychiatry. 1988;145:600–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Carey A. On the margins of citizenship: intellectual disability and civil rights in twentieth century America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  44. American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) practice guidelines for neuropsychological assessment and consultation. Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;21:209–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Independent Practice, Morristown, NJ, USA

    Joel E. Morgan

  2. Department of Graduate Psychology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA

    Bernice A. Marcopulos & Emily F. Matusz

  3. Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Bernice A. Marcopulos

Authors
  1. Joel E. Morgan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernice A. Marcopulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Emily F. Matusz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel E. Morgan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA

    Lisa D. Ravdin

  2. Department of Neurology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA

    Heather L. Katzen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Morgan, J.E., Marcopulos, B.A., Matusz, E.F. (2019). Capacity Evaluations in Older Adults: Neuropsychological Perspectives. In: Ravdin, L.D., Katzen, H.L. (eds) Handbook on the Neuropsychology of Aging and Dementia. Clinical Handbooks in Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93497-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation