Abstract
Currently, it is fundamental for world-class organizations to implement effective continuous improvement processes which ask for significant and sustainable cost reduction programs. However, there is a lack of models and methodologies that support and validate continuous improvement in organizations. Its application in the logistics operation is particularly important because, currently, it is a determining factor of competiveness and differentiation, affecting significantly the profitability of organizations. In this investigation, an innovative model of continuous improvement based on costs has been developed and implemented; it is structured on three main steps: (1) a definition of cost management responsibilities, (2) establishing a relationship between financial performance indicators and operational indicators and (3) a dynamic generation of a continuous cycle of continuous improvement. Its implementation results also in a three level maturity model (A–C). The model was developed and implemented in a benchmark logistics department of one of the most important first tier suppliers of the automotive industry. The studied company made possible the implementation of the model in its fullness (level C), since the logistics department is in a high maturity level of the cost management and performance measurement process. This model can be replicated in other companies, departments and supply chains that want to reduce the costs proactively through really effective and efficient continuous improvement processes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bourne, M., Neely, A., Mills, J., & Platts, K. (2003). Implementing performance measurement systems: A literature review. International Journal Business Performance Management, 5(1), 1–24.
Cai, J., Liu, X., Xiao, Z., & Liu, J. (2009). Improving supply chain performance management: A systematic approach to analyzing iterative KPI accomplishment. Decision Support Systems, 46, 512–521.
Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1992). The balanced scorecard—Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 72–79.
Meyer, M. (2002). Rethinking performance measurement: Beyond the balanced scorecard. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Parmenter, D. (2007). Key Performance Indicators (KPI): Developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Tornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students (5ª ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Zeng, A., & Rosseti, C. (2003). Developing a framework for evaluating the logistics costs in global sourcing process. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 785–803.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Afonso, P., Fertuzinhos, E. (2019). A Model and a Methodology for the Systematization of Continuous Improvement of Logistics Processes in World-Class Companies. In: Mula, J., Barbastefano, R., Díaz-Madroñero, M., Poler, R. (eds) New Global Perspectives on Industrial Engineering and Management. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93488-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93488-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93487-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93488-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)