Abstract
A Deterministic Equivalent Problem (DEP) is developed to understand the assignment of threats to secondary inspection at a U.S.-Mexican border port of entry, and how the overall assignment can affect security and the overall reward of further inspection. The United States and bordering countries benefit from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). But amongst the positive effects of NAFTA there is a looming drug threat that effects the overall flow of companies supply chains. In 2011, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) processed over 64,000 trucks, rail, and sea containers a day. During that 2011 Fiscal year CBP seized 5 million lb of narcotics, including nearly 370,000 lb at the ports of entry. The objective of the developed DEP is to incorporate real time data and to quantify how security officials assign threats to secondary inspection. This information can provide insight into staffing, resource allocation, and the disruption of industrial supply chains. This study will focus on the Pharr–Reynosa International Port of Entry. The expected outcome of the DEP will provide security officials insight into security policies and the associated cost associated with those strategies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bureau of Economic Analysis. (n.d.). Retrieved January 11, 2017, from https://www.bea.gov.
Cedillo-Campos, M. G., Sánchez-Ramírez, C., Vadali, S., Villa, J. C., & Menezes, M. B. (2014). Supply chain dynamics and the “cross-border effect”: The U.S.—Mexican border’s case. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 72, 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.03.015.
Feldman, R. M., & Valdez-Flores, C. (2010). Applied probability and stochastic processes. Berlin: Springer.
Kilmer, B., Everingham, S. S., Caulkins, J. P., Midgette, G., Liccardo Pacula, R., Reuter, P. H., & Lundberg, R. (2014). How big is the U.S. market for illegal drugs? (pp. 1–4). RAND Corporation.
Moya, H., & Villa, J. (2013). Rate of false positives as a security performance measure. In Proceedings of the 2014 System Engineering Research Conference.
Nichols, R., Anchia, R., & Madden, J. (2015, January 12). Joint interim committee to study the effects of border wait times interim report 2014 (Rep.). Retrieved August 12, 2016, from January 12, 2015.
Nikolaev, A. G., Jacobson, S. H., & Mclay, L. A. (2007). A sequential stochastic security system design problem for aviation security. Transportation Science, 41(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1070.0198.
Pharr-Reynosa Intl Bridge. (2015, November/December). Retrieved August 10, 2016, from http://pharr-tx.gov/departments/pharr-reynosa-intl-bridge/.
Rueda, G., & Moya, H. (2015, January). Rate of false positive on specific border cargo detection. In IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings (p. 1852). Institute of Industrial Engineers-Publisher.
The United States of America, U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (2008). C-TPAT’s Five step risk assessment process (pp. 1–39).
United States of America, Department of Justice. (2011). South Texas High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area: Drug Market Analysis 2011.
United States of America, Department of Homeland Security. (2014). U.S. Customs and Border Patrol Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2014.
United States of America, Department of Homeland Security. (2016). Budget-in-brief 2016.
Vadali, S., Kang, D., & Fierro, K. (2011). Border Delays and Economic Impact to the Freight Sector: An Exploration of the El Paso Ports of Entry.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Moya, H., Rueda, G. (2019). A Deterministic Equivalent Problem to Study the Effects of Security Policies. In: Mula, J., Barbastefano, R., Díaz-Madroñero, M., Poler, R. (eds) New Global Perspectives on Industrial Engineering and Management. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93488-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93488-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93487-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93488-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)