Skip to main content

A Multimodal Illusion of Force Improves Control Perception in Above-Surface Gesture: Elastic Zed-Zoom

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2074 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10893))

Abstract

Emerging above-surface technology is an opportunity to exploit interaction spaces above a device’s surface; however, the resulting loss of the proprioceptive feedback available from on-surface interactions degrades the user’s sense of control and precision. We asked whether a pseudohaptic illusion (PHI) could help: a sense of force in the absence of actual contact, induced by manipulating the relation of body motion to graphical and auditory cues.

To examine the value of above-surface PHIs, we used a zooming microtask, because finger occlusion impedes current implementations on small displays such as smartwatches. In a qualitative study (N = 12), we were able to trigger a physical illusion most often described as elasticity in 92% of participants through physical control/graphical display (C/D) manipulation, and that audio cues significantly strengthened the illusion. Participants experiencing this PHI reported improved sense of control when zooming, and found the interaction’s physicality natural.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agarawala, A., Balakrishnan, R.: Keepin’it real: pushing the desktop metaphor with physics, piles and the pen. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 1283–1292. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, X.A., Schwarz, J., Harrison, C., Mankoff, J., Hudson, S.E.: Air+touch: interweaving touch & in-air gestures. In: Proceedings of UIST, pp. 519–525. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Colgan, A.: How does the leap motion controller work? http://blog.leapmotion.com/. Accessed 24 Mar 2017

  4. Ernst, M.O., Bulthoff, H.H.: Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8(4), 162–169 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldstein, E.: Sensation and Perception, 5th edn. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Han, J., Ahn, S., Lee, G.: Transture: continuing a touch gesture on a small screen into the air. In: CHI Extended Abstracts, pp. 1295–1300. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hayward, V.: A brief taxonomy of tactile illusions and demonstrations that can be done in a hardware store. Brain Res. Bull. 75(6), 742–752 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Kratz, S., Rohs, M.: Hoverflow: exploring around-device interaction with IR distance sensors. In: MobileHCI, pp. 42:1–42:4. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kuchenbecker, K.J., Fiene, J., Niemeyer, G.: Improving contact realism through event-based haptic feedback. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comp. Graph. 12(2), 219–230 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leap Motion: Windows VR development (2017). https://developer.leapmotion.com/windows-vr. Accessed 28 Mar 2017

  11. Lécuyer, A., Burkhardt, J.M., Coquillart, S., Coiffet, P.: Boundary of illusion: an experiment of sensory integration with a pseudo-haptic system. In: IEEE VR, pp. 115–122 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lécuyer, A., Burkhardt, J.M., Etienne, L.: Feeling bumps and holes without a haptic interface: the perception of pseudo-haptic textures. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 239–246. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, J., Baek, S.: Elastic cursor and elastic edge: applying simulated resistance to interface elements for seamless edge-scroll. In: Adjunct Proceedings of UIST, pp. 63–64. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. MacLean, K.E., Schneider, O., Seifi, H.: The diverse tasks of haptic and multimodal design and how to support them. In: Handbook of Multimodal-Multisensor Interfaces, pp. 97–142. Morgan Claypool (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mandryk, R.L., Rodgers, M.E., Inkpen, K.M.: Sticky widgets: pseudo-haptic widget enhancements for multi-monitor displays. In: CHI Extended Abstracts, pp. 1621–1624. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marquardt, N., Jota, R., Greenberg, S., Jorge, J.A.: The continuous interaction space: interaction techniques unifying touch and gesture on and above a digital surface. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6948, pp. 461–476. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23765-2_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Mine, M.R., Brooks Jr., F.P., Sequin, C.H.: Moving objects in space: exploiting proprioception in virtual-environment interaction. In: SIGGRAPH, pp. 19–26. ACM (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nancel, M., Wagner, J., Pietriga, E., Chapuis, O., Mackay, W.: Mid-air pan-and-zoom on wall-sized displays. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 177–186. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pusch, A., Lécuyer, A.: Pseudo-haptics: from the theoretical foundations to practical system design guidelines. In: International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, pp. 57–64. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sarwar, M.S., Dobashi, Y., Preston, C., et al.: Bend, stretch, and touch: locating a finger on an actively deformed transparent sensor array. Sci. Adv. 3(3), e1602200 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sridhar, S., Markussen, A., et al.: Watchsense: on-and above-skin input sensing through a wearable depth sensor. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 3891–3902. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Srinivasan, M.A., Beauregard, G.L., Brock, D.: The impact of visual information on the haptic perception of stiffness in virtual environments. In: Haptic Symposium, vol. DSC:58, pp. 555–559. ASME (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wu, W.C., Basdogan, C., Srinivasan, M.A.: Visual, haptic and bimodal perception of size and stiffness in virtual environments. In: Haptic Symposium, vol. DSC:67, pp. 19–26. ASME (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Qualcomm and NSERC, carried out under UBC Ethics #H16-01549. We thank our UBC ECE collaborators Prof. John Madden and Mirza Saquib, and our many helpful colleagues in SPIN lab and the Designing for People research network.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilan Ustek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ustek, D., Chow, K., Zhang, H., MacLean, K. (2018). A Multimodal Illusion of Force Improves Control Perception in Above-Surface Gesture: Elastic Zed-Zoom. In: Prattichizzo, D., Shinoda, H., Tan, H., Ruffaldi, E., Frisoli, A. (eds) Haptics: Science, Technology, and Applications. EuroHaptics 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10893. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93445-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93445-7_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93444-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93445-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics