Abstract
This chapter examines the self in the context of management activities. Drawing upon Mead’s (1934) framing of the social self in process terms, we engage self-management in the context of the generalized other. Symbolic interactionists have long recognized the multifaceted aspects of the self—as the reflected, looking glass self (Cooley 1902) and the self as developed and contextualized in relation to others (Blumer 1969; Mead 1934). Embracing this long tradition of inquiry, in this chapter we attend to the related themes of the self as a target of management activities in an organizational context and the self as an object of one’s own management activities. By attending to ‘doing nothing’ as an aspect of deliberative action and self-management, this chapter contributes to an examination of inaction as social action. We pay particular attention to office holder perspectives and the circumstances where opting for inaction may be defined as a preferable or otherwise strategic course of action. Additionally, we examine self-management in the context of joint action and office holder attentiveness to the relational dynamics as a central aspect of self-management. Lastly, this chapter discusses being managed by addressing themes such as experiencing management as disruption and emotionality in the context of management related activities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
See Irvine (1999) for an extended examination of the social processes that accompany participation in support groups .
- 2.
- 3.
For an examination of self-management in more anonymous, urban settings see Lofland’s (1972) work on self-management as a tactical endeavor.
- 4.
See Chap. 3 for a more in-depth discussion of symbolic interactionism.
- 5.
For an additional discussion of these themes readers are directed to Chap. 7.
- 6.
See Herman and Miall’s (1990) discussion of the positive consequences of stigma relative to the experiences of mental illness and voluntary childlessness for a helpful consideration of this particular theme.
- 7.
There are some important parallels here with research within deviant subcultures. For example, Athens’ (2015b) discussion of the process of violentization attends to the strategic place that being perceived as a person capable of violence holds for potential violent encounters.
- 8.
The concept of master status was developed by Hughes (1945) and was used to frame how a quality of the person could become the prism through which all other aspects of the self were seen. For example the ascribed status of race (e.g., blackness) could define and modify achieved statuses (e.g., offices held). For a careful consideration of the development of the concept of master status over time see van den Scott and van den Hoonard (2016).
- 9.
For example, the self-management of the alcoholic self may rather centrally enlist the support and participation of others (Denzin 1993).
- 10.
While the notions of because and in-order-to motives are found in the Heideggerian and pragmatist traditions, our usage here is indebted to Alfred Schütz, notably his (1967) The Phenomenology of the Social World and Schütz and Luckmann’s (1973) summative volume The Structures of the Life-World.
- 11.
The concept of taken-for-granted has its roots in the phenomenological sociology of Schütz (1967). Referring to the complex set of intersubjectively established shared meanings that people may develop in the context of given ‘life worlds,’ these beliefs held in common are central to the social construction of everyday life. The emphasis here is on everyday knowledge as opposed to other forms of knowing such as expert knowledge.
- 12.
- 13.
This theme is well established in the extended literature that examines the learning of emotions in occupational and organizational settings. For example, see Haas’ (1977) discussion of learning emotions among high steel ironworkers, Scott and Myers’ (2005) examination of emotions and firefighters, and Barley’s (1983) discussion of the semiotic renderings of emotions in the context of funeral work.
- 14.
For example see, Schweingruber and Berns’ (2005) discussion of emotion management among door-to-door sales workers.
- 15.
- 16.
Particularly salient here are aspects of the socially constructed world that may be experienced in more objectified terms such as the worlds of language, science, art, social organizations and notions of shared histories (Berger and Luckmann 1967).
References
Albas, C., & Albas, D. (1988). Emotion work and emotion rules: The case of exams. Qualitative Sociology, 11(4), 259–274.
Athens, L. (2002). ‘Domination’: The blind spot in Mead’s analysis of the social act. Journal of Classical Sociology, 2(1), 25–42.
Athens, L. (2015a). Domination and subjugation in everyday life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Athens, L. (2015b). Violentization: A relatively singular theory of violent crime. Deviant Behavior, 36(8), 625–639.
Barley, S. (1983). The codes of the dead: The semiotics of funeral work. Urban Life, 12(1), 3–31.
Becker, H. S., Geer, B., Hughes, E. C., & Strauss, A. L. (1961). Boys in white. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Blumer, H. (1966). The sociological implications of the thought of George Herbert Mead. American Journal of Sociology, 71(5), 535–544.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Charmaz, K. (1983). Loss of self: A fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Sociology of Health & Illness, 5(2), 168–195.
Charmaz, K. (1991). Good days, bad days: The self in chronic illness and time. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner’s.
Cooley, C. H. (1909). Social organization: A study of the larger mind. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Cooley, C. H. (1918). Social process. New York: Scribner’s.
Côté, J. F. (2015). George Herbert Mead’s concept of society: A critical reconstruction. London: Routledge.
Couch, C. J. (1984). Symbolic interaction and generic sociological principles. Symbolic Interaction, 7(1), 1–13.
Denzin, N. K. (1993). The alcoholic society: Addiction and recovery of the self. London: Transaction Publishers.
Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3(4), 357–370.
Durkheim, E. (1968 [1915]). The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: Free Press.
Edgerton, R. B. (1993 [1967]). The cloak of competence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gawley, T. (2007). Revisiting trust in symbolic interaction: Presentations of trust development in university administration. Qualitative Sociological Review, 3(2), 46:63. Retrieved July 2017 from http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/archive_eng.php
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.
Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Spectrum.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishers.
Grills, S., & Grills, S. (2008). The social construction of doubt: Women’s accounts of uncertainty and chronic illness. In D. Driedger & M. Owen (Eds.), Dissonant disabilities: Women with chronic illnesses theorize their lives (pp. 53–64). Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars Press.
Haas, J. (1977). Learning real feelings: A study of high steel ironworkers’ reactions to fear and danger. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 4(2), 147–170.
Haas, J., & Shaffir, W. (1987). Becoming doctors: The professionalization of medical students. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Harrington, B. (2016). Capital without borders: Wealth managers and the one percent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Herman, N. J., & Miall, C. E. (1990). The positive consequences of stigma: Two case studies in mental and physical disability. Qualitative Sociology, 13(3), 251–269.
Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551–575.
Horowitz, R. (2012). In the public interest: Medical licensing and the disciplinary process. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Hughes, E. (1945). Dilemmas and contradictions of status. American Journal of Sociology, 50(5), 353–359.
Irvine, L. (1999). Codependent forevermore: The invention of self in a twelve step group. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: H. Holt.
Joas, H. (1985). G.H. Mead: A contemporary re-examination of his thought (R. Myer, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime: The sensual and moral attractions of doing evil. New York: Basic.
Koeber, C. (2002). Corporate restructuring, downsizing, and the middle class: The process and meaning of worker displacement in the “new” economy. Qualitative Sociology, 25(2), 217–246.
Kornberger, M., Justesen, L., & Mouritsen, J. (2011). “When you make manager, we put a big mountain in front of you”: An ethnography of managers in a Big 4 accounting firm. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(8), 514–533.
Kühn, S., Elsner, B., Prinz, W., & Brass, M. (2009). Busy doing nothing: Evidence for nonaction-effect binding. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 542–549.
Lemert, C., & Branaman, A. (Eds.). (1997). The Goffman reader. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lemert, E. M. (1962). Paranoia and the dynamics of exclusion. Sociometry, 25(1), 2–20.
Lesieur, H. R. (1977). The chase: Career of the compulsive gambler (1st ed.). Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.
Lofland, L. H. (1972). Self-management in public settings: Part l. Urban Life and Culture, 1(1), 93–108.
Mead, G. H. (1925). The genesis of the self and social control. The International Journal of Ethics, 35(3), 251–277.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mead, G. H. (1936). Movements of thought in the 19th century. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mead, G. H. (1938). The philosophy of the act. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Miall, C. E. (1986). The stigma of involuntary childlessness. Social Problems, 33(4), 268–282.
Miall, C. E. (1994). Community constructs of involuntary childlessness: Sympathy, stigma, and social support. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de sociologie, 31(4), 392–421.
Mills, C. W. (2000 [1959]). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Park, R. E., & Burgess, E. W. (1921). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Petrunik, M., & Shearing, C. D. (1983). Fragile facades: Stuttering and the strategic manipulation of awareness. Social Problems, 31(2), 125–138.
Prus, R. C. (1996). Symbolic interaction and ethnographic research: Intersubjectivity and the study of human lived experience. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Prus, R. C. (1997). Subcultural mosaics and intersubjective realities: An ethnographic research agenda for pragmatizing the social sciences. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Prus, R. C. (1999). Beyond the power mystique: Power as intersubjective accomplishment. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Prus, R., & Grills, S. (2003). The deviant mystique: Involvements, realities, and regulation. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Puddephatt, A. (2009). The search for meaning: Revisiting Herbert Blumer’s interpretation of G. H. Mead. The American Sociologist, 40(1–2), 89–105.
Sanders, C. R. (1995). Killing with kindness: Veterinary euthanasia and the social construction of personhood. Sociological Forum, 10(2), 195–214.
Schütz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Schütz, A. (1976). Collected papers II: Studies in social theory. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.
Schütz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Schweingruber, D., & Berns, N. (2005). Shaping the selves of young salespeople through emotion management. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 34(6), 679–706.
Scott, C., & Myers, K. (2005). The socialization of emotion: Learning emotion management at the fire station. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33(1), 67–92.
Scott, S. (2017). A sociology of nothing: Understanding the unmarked. Sociology (Online First). 17 pages. Retrieved October 10, 2017 from https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517690681
Scott, S., McDonnell, L., & Dawson, M. (2016). Stories of non-becoming: Non-issues, non-events and non-identities in asexual lives. Symbolic Interaction, 39(2), 268–286.
Seymour, D., & Sandiford, P. (2005). Learning emotion rules in service organizations: Socialization and training in the UK public-house sector. Work, Employment and Society, 19(3), 547–564.
Shalin, D. N. (1989). Mead, behaviorism and indeterminacy. Symbolic Interaction, 12(1), 37–41.
Shields, S. (2002). Speaking from the heart: Gender and the social meaning of emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. In K. Wolff (Ed.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Simmel, G. (1955). A contribution to the sociology of religion. American Journal of Sociology, 60(S6), 1–18.
Strauss, A. (1978). Negotiations: Varieties, contexts, processes, and social order. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings Publishers.
Turner, J. H., & Stets, J. E. (2005). The sociology of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weber, M. (1946). Max Weber: Essays in sociology (trans: Gerth, H. H. & Mills, C. W.). New York: Oxford University Press.
van den Scott, L., & van den Hoonard, D. (2016). The origin and evolution of Everett Hughes’s concept: ‘Master status’. In R. Helmes-Hayes & M. Santoro (Eds.), The Anthem companion to Everett Hughes (pp. 173–192). New York: Anthem Press.
Wiley, N. (1994). The semiotic self. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Wood, M., & Wardell, M. L. (1983). G.H. Mead’s social behaviorism vs. the a-structural bias of symbolic interactionism. Symbolic Interaction, 6(1), 85–96.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grills, S., Prus, R. (2019). Being Managed and Managing Self: Processes and Problematics of Self-regulation. In: Management Motifs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93429-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93429-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93428-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93429-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)