“This Is Not Ruin Tourism”: Social Media and the Quest for Authenticity in Urban Exploration

  • André Jansson


Industrial ruins, abandoned places and landscapes of urban decay have to an increasing extent come to surface in popular representations of towns and cities. Their appearances are widely circulated also through various social media platforms and online networks. Together, these “cultures of circulation” weave an increasingly complex imaginary texture of the recent past. In this chapter, I explore the cultural tensions between the rough, but no less phantasmagorical, materiality of decaying urban areas and the increasingly ephemeral cultures of online circulation. Exploring such a field, I argue, is a good way of grasping the different ways in which people imagine, mediate and relate to the half-forgotten remnants of the modern past, as well as a starting point for mapping the contested landscapes of the spreadable city.


  1. Andrejevic, M. iSpy: Surveillance and Power in the Interactive Era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2007.Google Scholar
  2. ———. Infoglut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think and Know. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
  3. Benjamin, W. “Naples.” In Walter Benjamin—Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiiographical Writings, edited by P. Demetz. New York: Schocken Books, 1925/1978.Google Scholar
  4. ———. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Walter Benjamin—Illuminations: Essays and Reflections, edited by Arendt, H. London: Fontana, 1935/1973.Google Scholar
  5. ———. Charles Baudelaire: A Lyric Poet in the Era of High Capitalism. London: Verso, 1983.Google Scholar
  6. Edensor, T. “The Ghosts of Industrial Ruins: Ordering and Disordering Memory in Excessive Space.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23 (2005): 829–849.Google Scholar
  7. Feifer, M. Going Places. London: Macmillan, 1985.Google Scholar
  8. Garrett, B. L. “Undertaking Recreational Trespass: Urban Exploration and Infiltration.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39, no. 1 (2014a): 1–13.Google Scholar
  9. ———. Explore Everything: Place-Hacking the City. London: Verso, 2014b.Google Scholar
  10. Gilloch, G. Myth and Metropolis: Walter Benjamin and the City. Cambridge: Polity, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. Grusin, R. Premediation: Affect and Mediality After 9/11. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
  12. Jansson, A. “Re-encoding the Spectacle: Urban Fatefulness and Mediated Stigmatization in ‘The City of Tomorrow’.” Urban Studies 41, no. 10 (2005): 1671–91.Google Scholar
  13. ———. “A Sense of Tourism: New Media and the Dialectic of Encapsulation/Decapsulation.” Tourist Studies 7, no. 1 (2007): 5–24.Google Scholar
  14. ———. Mediatization and Mobile Lives: A Critical Approach. London: Routledge, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  15. Jenkins. H., S. Ford, and J. Green. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York: New York University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  16. Klausen, M. “Making Place in the Media City.” Culture Unbound 4 (2012): 559–577.Google Scholar
  17. ———. “The Urban Exploration Imagery: Mediatization, Commodification and Affect.” Space and Culture, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, B., and E. LiPuma. “Cultures of Circulation: The Imaginations of Modernity.” Public Culture 14, no. 1 (2002): 191–213.Google Scholar
  19. MacCannell, D. The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class. London: Macmillan, 1976.Google Scholar
  20. Millington, N. “Post Industrial Imaginaries: Nature, Representation, and Ruin in Detroit, Michigan.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (2013): 279–296.Google Scholar
  21. Mott, C., and Roberts, S. M. “Not Everyone Has (the) Balls: Urban Exploration and the Persistence of Masculinist Geography.” Antipode 46, no. 1 (2014): 229–245.Google Scholar
  22. Munt, I. “The ‘Other’ Postmodern Tourism: Culture, Travel and the New Middle Classes.” Theory, Culture & Society 11, no. 3 (1994): 101–123.Google Scholar
  23. Ninjalicious. Access All Areas: A User’s Guide to the Art of Urban Exploration. Toronto: Infilpress. 2005.Google Scholar
  24. Robinson, P. “Conceptualizing Urban Exploration as Beyond Tourism and as Anti-tourism.” Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research 3, no. 2 (2015): 141–164.Google Scholar
  25. Slager, E. J. “Touring Detroit: Ruins, Representation and Redevelopment.” MA thesis in Geography, University of Oregon, Eugene, 2013.Google Scholar
  26. Steiner, C. J., and Y. Reisinger. “Understanding Existential Authenticity.” Annals of Tourism Research 33, no. 2 (2005): 299–318.Google Scholar
  27. Tegtmeyer, L. “Tourism Aesthetics in Ruinscapes: Bargaining Cultural and Monetary Values of Detroit’s Negative Image.” Tourist Studies 16, no. 4 (2016): 462–477.Google Scholar
  28. Urry, J. The Tourist Gaze. London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
  29. Van Dijck, J. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  30. Wang, N. “Rethinking Authenticity in Tourism Experience.” Annals of Tourism Research 26, no. 2 (1999): 349–370.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • André Jansson
    • 1
  1. 1.Karlstad UniversityKarlstadSweden

Personalised recommendations