Skip to main content

Police

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Public Service Accountability

Abstract

Theresa May consider her police reforms in the period that she was Home Secretary to be one of the outstanding successes of the post-recession public sector reforms. The introduction of Police and Crime Commissioners, reform of HMIC, and the diminution of the institutional power of the police were central to these reforms. These reforms changed the nature of accountability arrangements for the 43 territorial police forces in England and Wales. These forces are controlled locally and deal with the vast majority of crimes, such as robbery, arson, theft, and assault. The analysis suggests that, as in healthcare, the year 2012 was a key turning point. Prior to 2012 accountability, transparency, and public assurance were diminishing, after 2012, we find that it has tended to improve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Audit Commission. (1995). Local Authority Performance Indicators 1994/5: Volume 3 Police and Fire Services. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission. (2009). Use of Resources Framework—Overall Approach and Key Lines of Enquiry 2008 (as updated in February 2009). London: Audit Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office. (2009). Public Service Agreements. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caless, B., & Owens, J. (2016). Police and Crime Commissioners: The Transformation of Police Accountability. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, P., Ferry, L., & Zakaria, Z. (2014). A ‘Panoptical’ or ‘Synoptical’ Approach to Monitoring Performance? Local Public Services in England and the Widening Accountability Gap. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(6), 529–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian. (2012, August 22). Bonfire of the Quangos: The Victims. The Guardian. Retrieved August 22, 2012, from http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2012/aug/22/bonfire-quangos-victims-list.

  • HMIC. (2017). State of Policing: The Annual Assessment of Policing in England and Wales, 2016. London: Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMICFRS. (2017). Proposed Fire and Rescue Services Inspection Programme and Framework 2018/19. For Consultation. London: Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2017). Fire and Rescue National Framework for England Government Consultation. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons. (2016). Police and Crime Commissioner Elections: 2016. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Home Affairs Committee. (2010). Policing: Police and Crime Commissioners. Second Report of Session 2010–11. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Independent Police Commission. (2013). Policing for a Better Britain. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C., & Dewing, I. P. (2009). Police Authorities in England and Wales: Board Composition and Corporate Governance. Public Money Manage, 29(5), 292–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B. (2017). Fire Minister’s Speech to Reform. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • LGA/CfPS. (2011). Police and Crime Panels Guidance on Role and Composition. London: Local Government Association/Centre for Public Scrutiny.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, S., & Rowe, M. (2015). Electing Police and Crime Commissioners in England and Wales: Prospecting for the Democratisation of Policing. Policing and Society, 25(4), 358–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowndes, V., & Pratchett, L. (2012). Local Governance Under the Coalition Government: Austerity, Localism and the ‘Big Society’. Local Government Studies, 38(1), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, T. (2016). Home Secretary Speech on Fire Reform. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P., Eckersley, P., & Ferry, L. (2017). Accountability and Transparency: Police Forces in England and Wales. Public Policy and Administration, 32(3), 197–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAO. (2014). Police Accountability: Landscape Review. London: National Audit Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAO. (2015). Financial Sustainability of Police Forces in England and Wales. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prime Minister’s Office. (2011). Letter to Cabinet Ministers on Transparency and Open Data. Prime Minister’s Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raine, J. W. (2015). Enhancing Police Accountability in England and Wales: What Differences Are Police and Crime Commissioners Making? In Police Services (pp. 97–113). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Raine, J. W., & Keasey, P. (2012). From Police Authorities to Police and Crime Commissioners: Might Policing Become More Publicly Accountable? International Journal of Emergency Services, 1(2), 122–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M., & Lister, S. (2015). Accountability of Policing. In Accountability of Policing (pp. 17–33). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Murphy .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Murphy, P., Ferry, L., Glennon, R. (2019). Police. In: Public Service Accountability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93384-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics