Skip to main content

Complex Networks for Terrorist Target Prediction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling (SBP-BRiMS 2018)

Abstract

Developments in statistics and computer science have influenced research on many social problems. This process also applies to the study of terrorism. In this context, network analysis is one of the most popular mathematical methods for analyzing terrorist organizations and dynamics. Nonetheless, few studies have applied network science to the analysis of terrorist events. Therefore, in this work we first introduce a novel method to analyze the heterogeneous dynamics of terrorist attacks through the creation of a dynamic meta-network of terror for the period 1997–2016. Second, we use our terrorist meta-network to test the power of Network-based Inference algorithm in predicting terrorist targets. Results are promising and show how this algorithm reaches high levels of precision, accuracy, and recall and indicate that network outcomes can be used in broader machine learning models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Western Europe region data from 1997–2016 include Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom. North America region data for the same period include Canada, Mexico and United States of America.

  2. 2.

    We used the general target type information available in the dataset to prevent problems of over-specification and noise in the data, considering that a more general description reduces the risk of coding error, consequently preserving results reliability.

  3. 3.

    It is expectable that taking into account attacks of those groups that existed at (t−1) improves accuracy of prediction. Though not empirically confirmed in this work, future work will test this hypothesis on all pairs of years included in the analysis.

References

  1. Subrahmanian, V.S. (ed.): Handbook of Computational Approaches to Counterterrorism. Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5311-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Koschade, S.: A social network analysis of Jemaah Islamiyah: the applications to counterterrorism and intelligence. Stud. Confl. Terror. 29, 559–575 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/10576100600798418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Belli, R., Freilich, J.D., Chermak, S.M., Boyd, K.A.: Exploring the crime-terror nexus in the United States: a social network analysis of a Hezbollah network involved in trade diversion. Dyn. Asymmetric Confl. 8, 263–281 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2015.1104420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moon, I.-C., Carley, K.M.: Modeling and simulating terrorist networks in social and geospatial dimensions. IEEE Intell. Syst. 22, 40–49 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2007.4338493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Medina, R., Hepner, G.: Geospatial analysis of dynamic terrorist networks. In: Karawan, I.A., McCormack, W., Reynolds, S.E. (eds.) Values and Violence, pp. 151–167. Springer, Dordrecht (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8660-1_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Benigni, M.C., Joseph, K., Carley, K.M.: Online extremism and the communities that sustain it: detecting the ISIS supporting community on Twitter. PLOS ONE 12, e0181405 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Desmarais, B.A., Cranmer, S.J.: Forecasting the locational dynamics of transnational terrorism: a network analytic approach. Secur. Inform. 2, 8 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-8532-2-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tutun, S., Khasawneh, M.T., Zhuang, J.: New framework that uses patterns and relations to understand terrorist behaviors. Expert Syst. Appl. 78, 358–375 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brandt, P.T., Sandler, T.: What do transnational terrorists target? Has it changed? Are we safer? J. Confl. Resolut. 54, 214–236 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002709355437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism: Global Terrorism Database (Data file) (2016). https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd

  11. Zhou, T., Ren, J., Medo, M., Zhang, Y.-C.: Bipartite network projection and personal recommendation. Phys. Rev. E 76 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.76.046115

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative Award N00014-17-1-2675 and the Center for Computational Analysis of Social and Organization Systems (CASOS). The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the ONR or the U.S. government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gian Maria Campedelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Campedelli, G.M., Cruickshank, I., Carley, K.M. (2018). Complex Networks for Terrorist Target Prediction. In: Thomson, R., Dancy, C., Hyder, A., Bisgin, H. (eds) Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling. SBP-BRiMS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10899. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93372-6_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93372-6_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93371-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93372-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics