Skip to main content

Analyzing Social Bots and Their Coordination During Natural Disasters

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling (SBP-BRiMS 2018)

Abstract

Social bots help automate many sociotechnical behaviors such as tweeting/retweeting a message, ‘liking’ a tweet, following users, and coordinate or even compete with other bots. Social bots exist as advertising bots, entertainment bots, spam bots, and influence bots. In this research, we focus on influence bots, i.e., automated Twitter accounts that attempt to affect or influence behaviors of others. Some of these bots operate independently and autonomously for years without getting noticed or suspended. Furthermore, some of the more advanced influence social bots exhibit highly sophisticated coordination and communication patterns with complex organizational structures. This study aims to explore the role of Twitter social bots during the 2017 natural disasters and evaluate their coordination strategies for disseminating information. We collected data from Twitter during Hurricane Harvey, Hurricane Irma, Hurricane Maria, and Mexico Earthquake that occurred in 2017. This resulted in a total of over 1.2 million tweets generated by nearly 800,000 Twitter accounts. Social bots were detected in the data. Social networks of top bot and top non-bot accounts were compared to examine characteristic differences in their networks. Bot networks were further examined to identify coordination patterns. Hashtag analysis of the tweets shared by bots further helped in identifying hoaxes (such as, ‘shark swimming on freeway’) and non-relevant narratives (black lives matter, DACA, anti-Semitic narratives, Kim Jong-Un, nuclear test, etc.) that were disseminated by bots in several languages, such as French, Spanish, Arabic, Japanese, Korean, etc., besides English.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gayer, O.: What is an Internet Bot | How Bots Can Hurt Your Business. https://www.incapsula.com/blog/understanding-bots-and-your-business.html

  2. Types of Bots: An Overview of Chatbot Diversity | botnerds.com, http://botnerds.com/types-of-bots/

  3. @DFRLab: Le Pen’s (Small) Online Army (2017). https://medium.com/dfrlab/le-pens-small-online-army-c754058630f0

  4. Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: The rise of social bots. Commun. ACM 59, 96–104 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chu, Z., Gianvecchio, S., Wang, H., Jajodia, S.: Who is tweeting on Twitter: human, bot, or cyborg? In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, pp. 21–30. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, G., Mohanlal, M., Wilson, C., Wang, X., Metzger, M., Zheng, H., Zhao, B.Y.: Social turing tests: crowdsourcing sybil detection. ArXiv Prepr. arXiv:1205.3856 (2012)

  7. Abokhodair, N., Yoo, D., McDonald, D.W.: Dissecting a social botnet: growth, content and influence in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 839–851. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hawksey, M.: TAGS v6.0 ns. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EqFm184RiXsAA0TQkOyWQDsr4eZ0XRuSFryIDun_AA4/edit?pli=1&usp=embed_facebook&usp=embed_facebook

  9. Botometer by OSoMe. https://botometer.iuni.iu.edu

  10. Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2008, P10008 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is funded in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation (IIS-1636933, ACI-1429160, and IIS-1110868), U.S. Office of Naval Research (N00014-10-1-0091, N00014-14-1-0489, N00014-15-P-1187, N00014-16-1-2016, N00014-16-1-2412, N00014-17-1-2605, N00014-17-1-2675), U.S. Air Force Research Lab, U.S. Army Research Office (W911NF-16-1-0189), U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (W31P4Q-17-C-0059) and the Jerry L. Maulden/Entergy Fund at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations. The researchers gratefully acknowledge the support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tuja Khaund , Samer Al-Khateeb , Serpil Tokdemir or Nitin Agarwal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Khaund, T., Al-Khateeb, S., Tokdemir, S., Agarwal, N. (2018). Analyzing Social Bots and Their Coordination During Natural Disasters. In: Thomson, R., Dancy, C., Hyder, A., Bisgin, H. (eds) Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling. SBP-BRiMS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10899. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93372-6_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93372-6_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93371-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93372-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics