Skip to main content

Channels of Influence or How Non-Members Can Influence EU Energy Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Political Economy of Energy in Europe

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

Abstract

External suppliers of energy interested in access to EU energy market use various instruments to influence the process of energy policy-making and promote their interests. This chapter examines how those external suppliers are present in Brussels, their interests in energy policy, the formal and informal frameworks they operate in as well as various instruments they have at their disposal to influence the process of policy-making in the EU. The focus is on the use of communicative and other instruments employed by Norway, a quasi-EU member through its EEA affiliation, and Russia, the main external supplier of energy to the EU and source of strategic concern, the two countries interested in security of demand facing EU preoccupied with security of supply and diversification of supplies and routes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The possible impact of this growing focus on developing a ‘greener’ energy system in the EU is examined in detail in Chap. 4 of this volume.

  2. 2.

    http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Energy_production_and_imports.

  3. 3.

    The impact of this system is discussed in Chap. 2 of this volume; Chap. 3 examines the strategies chosen by external suppliers in their dealings with EU market and regulatory powers.

  4. 4.

    This definition is based on the seminal work by Freeman and Reed (2004 (1982)).

  5. 5.

    http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/homePage.do.

  6. 6.

    http://www.acig.ru/en/.

  7. 7.

    http://www.rumyantsevconsulting.com/.

  8. 8.

    http://www.aebrus.ru/.

  9. 9.

    http://irt-rus.org/npksp.

  10. 10.

    https://twitter.com/BiznesAlert/status/946868241393180674.

  11. 11.

    The questions of how the EU projects its market and regulatory power are dealt with in Chaps. 2 and 3 of this volume and elsewhere (Godzimirski & Nowak, 2018); the specifics of Norway’s relationship with the EU as regulated by the EEA Agreement are dealt with in Chap. 6 of this volume.

  12. 12.

    https://lobbyfacts.eu/representative/085864fc985b4bd5955d25b76b207942.

  13. 13.

    http://www.gazprom.com/press/news/2013/december/article179535/.

  14. 14.

    https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikhail-lebedev-21b3a849/.

  15. 15.

    https://www.regjeringen.no/no/aktuelt/2nd-EU-Norway-Energy-Conference/id2001528/.

  16. 16.

    https://twitter.com/norwayeu/status/657201046528348161.

  17. 17.

    https://twitter.com/energy4europe/status/694530560778174464.

  18. 18.

    https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/events/3rd-eu-norway-energy-conference.

  19. 19.

    https://twitter.com/marossefcovic/status/698194531674693632.

  20. 20.

    https://twitter.com/norwayeu/status/786504639030042624.

  21. 21.

    https://twitter.com/NorwayEU/status/791980796714315776.

  22. 22.

    https://twitter.com/ingridschulerud/status/798821219243962368.

  23. 23.

    https://twitter.com/sletnes/status/826898165513072640.

  24. 24.

    https://twitter.com/NorwayEU/status/836257667345756161.

  25. 25.

    https://twitter.com/NorwayEU/status/836253151137267712.

  26. 26.

    https://twitter.com/sletnes/status/844842820200382464 and https://twitter.com/NorwayEU/status/845259953803800576.

  27. 27.

    https://twitter.com/IngridSchulerud/status/846679557524668417 and https://twitter.com/IngridSchulerud/status/846755171061415937.

  28. 28.

    https://twitter.com/NorwayEU/status/864498744837984256.

  29. 29.

    https://twitter.com/NorwayEU/status/872816118540505088.

  30. 30.

    https://twitter.com/NorwayEU/status/880829316946427907.

  31. 31.

    https://twitter.com/marossefcovic/status/649519015040282625.

  32. 32.

    https://twitter.com/MarosSefcovic/status/802060184256479233.

  33. 33.

    https://twitter.com/MarosSefcovic/status/802100372244463616.

  34. 34.

    All information on Russian lobbying in the following paragraphs stems from the official website of the Permanent Mission at https://russiaeu.ru/en.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakub M. Godzimirski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Godzimirski, J.M. (2019). Channels of Influence or How Non-Members Can Influence EU Energy Policy. In: Godzimirski, J.M. (eds) New Political Economy of Energy in Europe. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93360-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics