Applicability Problems Generalized
In this paper, I will do preparatory work for a generalized account of applicability, that is, for an account which works for math-to-physics, math-to-math, and physics-to-math application. I am going to present and discuss some examples of these three kinds of application, and I will confront them in order to see whether it is possible to find analogies among them and whether they can be ultimately considered as instantiations of a unique pattern. I will argue that these analogies can be exploited in order to get a better understanding of the applicability of mathematics to physics and of the complex relationship between physics and mathematics.
I would like to thank Prof. Gabriele Lolli, for his constant support; Prof. Charlotte Werndl for her suggestions on a previous draft of this paper; Prof. Mario Piazza and Prof. Gabriele Pulcini for their work in making this volume possible; an anonimous referee, for their precious comments. Finally, a special thank to Pauline van Wierst, who read the paper and helped me with constant support and important insights.
- Atiyah, Michael. 2003. The work of Edward Witten. In Fields medallists’ lectures, World scientific series in 20th century mathematics, ed. M. Atiyah and D. Iagolnitzer, vol. 9, 2nd ed., 522–526. New Jersey/London/Singapore/Hong Kong: World Scientific.Google Scholar
- Aubert, B. et al. 2006. Measurement of the spin of the Ω − hyperon. Physical Review Letters 97: 112001. BABAR collaboration.Google Scholar
- Bangu, Sorin. 2012. The applicability of mathematics in science: Indispensability and ontology. Basingstoke (UK): Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Devine Thomas, K. 2010. The fundamental lemma: From minor irritant to central problem. The institute letter – Institute for advanced studies (Princeton, NJ) Summer. Available online at https://www.ias.edu/ideas/2010/fundamental-lemma. Accessed on 23 May 2017.
- French, Steven. 1999. Models and mathematics in physics: The role of group theory. In From physics to philosophy, ed. J. Butterfield and C. Pagonis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Ginammi, Michele. 2015. Structure and applicability. In From logic to practice. Italian studies in philosophy of mathematics, Boston studies in the philosophy of science, ed. G. Lolli, M. Panza, and G. Venturi, vol. 308, chapter 11. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Steiner, Mark. 1998. The applicability of mathematics as a philosophical problem. Cambridge (Mass): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Suárez, Mauricio. 2015. Representation in science. In Oxford handbook in philosophy of science, ed. P. Humphreys. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Weil, André. 2005. Letter to Simone Weil. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 52(3):334–341. Translated by Martin H. Krieger.Google Scholar
- Wigner, Eugene Paul. 1960. The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 13(1): 1–14. Reprinted in Symmetries and Reflections. 1967. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar